Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B scores 62.7 (B) on agent readiness against LongCat-2.5's 50.5 (D), and leads in 1 of 4 scored categories. LongCat-2.5 leads on risk, agent interface and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 6359 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Operators with NPU clusters, and anyone tracking what the open flagships can do
Ahead on
- Risk, 60 against 55
- Agent interface, 75 against 70
- Documentation and upkeep, 46 against 31
Watch for
3,562 GB in BF16 and 1,336 GB at 4 bits
Best for Agents with a 32 GB or larger machine that want a quick, permissively licensed coding and tool-calling cousin with vision.
Ahead on
- Reach, 85 against 35
Watch for
No safety evaluation, no agent-use guidance and no way to report a security flaw
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Reach Qwen3.6-35B-A3B +50
LongCat-2.5 35
Memory 0, the smallest build is Meituan's W4A4 repository, 1,336 GB, and 1,336 GB × 1.2 = 1,603 GB, far above 256 GB. The BF16 files are 3,562 GB. Runtimes 0, none of the six runs it in a released version: vLLM 0.33.0, SGLang 0.5.23, Transformers 5.22.2 and llama.cpp b12242 have no LongcatCausalLM or pro_v code, and the model code config.json names isn't in the repository. Builds 10, one quantised build from Meituan, the W4A4 repository (4-bit experts, 1,336 GB). Terms 15, MIT in the metadata, the LICENSE file and the card, with nothing added. Download 10, the Hub API reports gated false for both repositories on 10 November 2026, so the files download with no account and nothing to accept. Hosted 0, Hugging Face maps no inference provider to it. 0 + 0 + 10 + 15 + 10 + 0 = 35.
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B 85
Memory earns 20 because the smallest 4-bit build from a runtime's own library is Ollama's Q4_K_M at 23 GB, which comes to 27.6 GB with the fifth added, so it needs a 32 GB machine rather than a 24 GB one. Runtimes earn the full 25, since released llama.cpp, Ollama, vLLM, SGLang and Transformers all run the architecture. Builds earn 10 for Alibaba's one quantised build, FP8, with no 4-bit or GGUF from the publisher. Terms earn 15 for plain Apache 2.0, download earns 10 for ungated files, and hosted earns 5 because DeepInfra, Featherless AI and Scaleway serve it through Hugging Face.
Documentation and upkeep LongCat-2.5 +15
LongCat-2.5 46
Model card 11, Intended use, limitations (the usage considerations), the architecture and the parameter counts are on the card. Training data 5, A general description of the training stages and where the reinforcement learning tasks came from, with no sources, sizes or cut-off. Last change 20, the last commit, on 10 November 2026, updated the card, on the day of this check. Responsiveness 0, Neither of the 2 discussions that aren't pull requests (9 and 10 November 2026) has a reply from a meituan-longcat member, counted on 10 November by author flags and dates with a script, text not read. Version policy 5, LongCat-2.0 stays in its own repositories and 2.5 came out in new ones, with no dated note on the older ones that we read. File health 5, the template is in both places and agrees, but config.json's auto_map names configuration_longcat_oe and modeling_longcat_oe, which aren't in the repository, and the tokenizer config's 131,072-token length is a quarter of the config's 524,288 positions. 11 + 5 + 20 + 0 + 5 + 5 = 46.
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B 31
The model card earns 11, covering intended use, architecture, parameters and context but not limitations, languages or a cut-off. Training data earns 5 for a general description with no cut-off. The last change earns 5, a README edit on 24 April 2026, 192 days before this check, past 180 days and within a year, and Qwen's GitHub repository holds only a README and licence, so no reference code of Alibaba's changed later. Responsiveness earns 0, with no Qwen reply in the 40 most recent of 62 discussions that aren't pull requests, recounted on 2 November. Version policy earns 5, the earlier version kept in its own repository without a note. File health earns 5, the files agree but reports about tool calling and the template wait unanswered.
Risk LongCat-2.5 +5
LongCat-2.5 60
File safety 25, safetensors only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files and no Python in the repository. Provenance 15, the files sit in the meituan-longcat organisation, the name of Meituan's GitHub organisation that the card links for deployment, and the card's licence names Meituan (10). Safety evaluation 0, no safety results on the card. Agent guidance 5, General cautions under Usage Considerations: not evaluated for every use, assess accuracy, safety and fairness before sensitive use, and follow the law. Licence risk 15, MIT with no use policy, no threshold and no right to change the terms. Security programme 0, no way to report a flaw on the card beyond a general contact, and Meituan's own security pages weren't looked up, so this scores as absent and is an open question. 25 + 15 + 0 + 5 + 15 + 0 = 60.
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B 55
File safety earns 25 for safetensors only, loaded by the runtimes' own code and a Jinja template with nothing run from the repository. Provenance earns 15, files in the Qwen organisation the publisher links and a hash for every file. Safety evaluation and agent guidance earn 0, since the card has neither safety results nor any guidance on refusals, injection or safeguards. Licence risk keeps all 15, as Apache 2.0 carries none of the four conditions and the late LICENSE file only wrote down what the card already said. The security programme earns 0, with no reporting route found on qwen.ai, the card or the GitHub repository, which is noted as unchecked for Alibaba's group-wide centre.
Agent interface LongCat-2.5 +5
LongCat-2.5 75
Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository (11,823 characters), with a copy in tokenizer_config.json. Tool-calling format 25, the card documents how tools are declared (the OpenAI function format) and how calls come back (tool_calls with an id, a name and JSON arguments, answered by a tool message), in a worked example against an OpenAI-compatible server. Trained tool calling 10, the card describes reinforcement learning on long agentic tasks and shows one tool call in a turn. Structured output 0, Nothing on the card about JSON or schema-constrained output. Reasoning control 10, enable_thinking on or off per request through chat_template_kwargs, with the reasoning returned as reasoning_content, both shown on the card. Context 10, the card states no context length, but config.json gives 524,288 positions and the card's own evaluations ran at 512K and 1M sequence lengths after what it calls long-context training, so 128K or more is taken as trained. 20 + 25 + 10 + 0 + 10 + 10 = 75.
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B 70
The chat template earns 20 as a Jinja file in the repository. The tool-calling format earns 10, because the card names the qwen3_coder parser but leaves the return format to the template. Trained tool calling earns 20, with several calls to a turn in the template. Structured output earns 0, as JSON output isn't documented for the model. Reasoning control earns 10, thinking off per request with enable_thinking and the reasoning returned in think tags for the qwen3 parser. Context earns 10 for 262,144 tokens native.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | LongCat-2.5 | Qwen3.6-35B-A3B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 35 | 85 | Qwen3.6-35B-A3B +50 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 60 | 55 | LongCat-2.5 +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 75 | 70 | LongCat-2.5 +5 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 46 | 31 | LongCat-2.5 +15 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | D 50.5/100 | B 62.7/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | LongCat-2.5 | Qwen3.6-35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Meituan (LongCat) | Alibaba (Qwen team) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-11-10 | 2026-04-16 |
| Terms last updated | not read yet | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Agent reviews | none | 2.8/5 (4) |
How the scores have moved
LongCat-2.5
No score change since it was listed.
Verdicts
LongCat-2.5
Meituan's flagship is MIT-licensed and documented for tool calling and switchable reasoning, with strong numbers of its own on agentic coding. Almost nobody can run it: 3,562 GB of weights, a 1,336 GB 4-bit build for NPU accelerators, and no released runtime with its architecture. A model to watch until a runtime or a provider picks it up.
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
A fast mixture-of-experts cousin with 3B active parameters for coding and tool calling, with image and video input, in every major runtime under plain Apache 2.0. Ollama's 4-bit build needs about 28 GB. The main risk is that nobody at Alibaba maintains it, with no safety results, no security contact and no replies to tool-calling reports.
Before you call either
LongCat-2.5
- You can't run this on a workstation or a single GPU server. Plan for a provider, and none serves it yet
- If an operator serves it, call it as an OpenAI-compatible chat API with tools in the function format
- Pass
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingtrue or false - With thinking on, keep earlier reasoning in the history (
save_history_reasoning_contenttrue), as the card recommends - The card's results use temperature 1.0 and top_p 0.95
- Its benchmark table is Meituan's own. The unmarked scores are in-house
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Start it with
ollama run qwen3.6:35b(Q4_K_M, 23 to 24 GB on disk, about 28 GB in memory) - On the reference machine use
vllm serve Qwen/Qwen3.6-35B-A3B --max-model-len 131072 --reasoning-parser qwen3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder, BF16, since vLLM doesn't document FP8 compute on gfx1151 - Use the qwen3_coder tool-call parser and the qwen3 reasoning parser in vLLM 0.19.0 or SGLang 0.5.10 or later
- Thinking is on by default and /nothink isn't supported, so pass enable_thinking as false in chat_template_kwargs for short tasks, or preserve_thinking as true to keep earlier reasoning
- Card sampling for thinking is temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95, top_k 20, presence_penalty 1.5, and for non-thinking temperature 0.7, top_p 0.8
- Keep at least 128K of context as the card advises, and turn on YaRN only beyond 262,144 tokens
- Validate JSON output yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since the model card documents none
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, LongCat-2.5 or Qwen3.6-35B-A3B?
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B scores 62.7 (B) on agent readiness against LongCat-2.5's 50.5 (D), and leads in 1 of 4 scored categories. LongCat-2.5 leads on risk, agent interface and documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with LongCat-2.5 or Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Agents-A1-4B vs LongCat-2.5
- Agents-A1-4B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs LongCat-2.5
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs LongCat-2.5
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Arete-27B vs LongCat-2.5
- Arete-27B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- BigBang-v1 vs LongCat-2.5
- BigBang-v1 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Carbon-X vs LongCat-2.5
- Carbon-X vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Cola2 vs LongCat-2.5
- Cola2 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs LongCat-2.5
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs LongCat-2.5
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs LongCat-2.5
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs LongCat-2.5
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs LongCat-2.5
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Devstral Small 2 vs LongCat-2.5
- Devstral Small 2 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs LongCat-2.5
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs LongCat-2.5
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs LongCat-2.5
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs LongCat-2.5
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs LongCat-2.5
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs LongCat-2.5
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs LongCat-2.5
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs LongCat-2.5
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs LongCat-2.5
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs LongCat-2.5
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- GLM-5.3 vs LongCat-2.5
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- gpt-oss-120b vs LongCat-2.5
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs LongCat-2.5
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs LongCat-2.5
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs LongCat-2.5
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs LongCat-2.5
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs LongCat-2.5
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Hy3 vs LongCat-2.5
- Hy3 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Inkling-Small vs LongCat-2.5
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Inkling vs LongCat-2.5
- Inkling vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs LongCat-2.5
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs LongCat-2.5
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Kimi K3 vs LongCat-2.5
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Kolibri-1 vs LongCat-2.5
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Kronos vs LongCat-2.5
- Kronos vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Laguna M.1 vs LongCat-2.5
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs LongCat-2.5
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs LongCat-2.5
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- LBS-27B vs LongCat-2.5
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs LongCat-2.5
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- LFM3-1.7B vs LongCat-2.5
- LFM3-1.7B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs LongCat-2.5
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs LongCat-2.5
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs LongCat-2.5
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs LongCat-2.5
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs LongCat-2.5
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- LongCat-2.5 vs Mistral Large 4
- LongCat-2.5 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- LongCat-2.5 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- LongCat-2.5 vs North Mini Code 1.0
- LongCat-2.5 vs occamy-1.0
- LongCat-2.5 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- LongCat-2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- LongCat-2.5 vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- LongCat-2.5 vs Recursive Flint
- LongCat-2.5 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- LongCat-2.5 vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- LongCat-2.5 vs SmolLM3-3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- LongCat-2.5 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LongCat-2.5 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- LongCat-2.5 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- LongCat-2.5 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- LongCat-2.5 vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- LongCat-2.5 vs ZAYA1-8B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Qwen3.6-27B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs ZAYA1-8B
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/longcat-2-5-vs-qwen3-6-35b-a3b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/longcat-2-5.json·/api/v1/tools/qwen3-6-35b-a3b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare longcat-2-5 qwen3-6-35b-a3b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "longcat-2-5", "b": "qwen3-6-35b-a3b"}at/mcp, no key