Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
LongCat-2.5 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
Spark-X2.6-4B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against LongCat-2.5's 50.5 (D), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. LongCat-2.5 leads on risk and agent interface. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 6359 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Operators with NPU clusters, and anyone tracking what the open flagships can do
Ahead on
- Risk, 60 against 50
- Agent interface, 75 against 70
Watch for
3,562 GB in BF16 and 1,336 GB at 4 bits
Best for Agents that want a tiny local model for tool loops and long documents on a laptop, CPU or small GPU.
Ahead on
- Reach, 85 against 35
- Documentation and upkeep, 51 against 46
Watch for
No safety results and no agent or prompt-injection guidance
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Reach Spark-X2.6-4B +50
LongCat-2.5 35
Memory 0, the smallest build is Meituan's W4A4 repository, 1,336 GB, and 1,336 GB × 1.2 = 1,603 GB, far above 256 GB. The BF16 files are 3,562 GB. Runtimes 0, none of the six runs it in a released version: vLLM 0.33.0, SGLang 0.5.23, Transformers 5.22.2 and llama.cpp b12242 have no LongcatCausalLM or pro_v code, and the model code config.json names isn't in the repository. Builds 10, one quantised build from Meituan, the W4A4 repository (4-bit experts, 1,336 GB). Terms 15, MIT in the metadata, the LICENSE file and the card, with nothing added. Download 10, the Hub API reports gated false for both repositories on 10 November 2026, so the files download with no account and nothing to accept. Hosted 0, Hugging Face maps no inference provider to it. 0 + 0 + 10 + 15 + 10 + 0 = 35.
Spark-X2.6-4B 85
Memory 30, SparkLLM's Q4_K_M GGUF is 3.19 GB, about 3.8 GB with a fifth added, which fits 8 GB. Runtimes 15 of 25, released llama.cpp, SGLang (to v0.5.23) and Ollama run the spark2_5 architecture X2.6 keeps, while vLLM needs SparkLLM's plugin, Transformers needs the repository's code and LM Studio has no catalogue entry. Builds 15, SparkLLM publishes FP8, INT8, INT4 and GGUF builds. Terms 15, Apache 2.0 with nothing added, on its own base. Download 10, nothing is gated. Hosted 0, no provider or SparkLLM API serves it.
Risk LongCat-2.5 +10
LongCat-2.5 60
File safety 25, safetensors only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files and no Python in the repository. Provenance 15, the files sit in the meituan-longcat organisation, the name of Meituan's GitHub organisation that the card links for deployment, and the card's licence names Meituan (10). Safety evaluation 0, no safety results on the card. Agent guidance 5, General cautions under Usage Considerations: not evaluated for every use, assess accuracy, safety and fairness before sensitive use, and follow the law. Licence risk 15, MIT with no use policy, no threshold and no right to change the terms. Security programme 0, no way to report a flaw on the card beyond a general contact, and Meituan's own security pages weren't looked up, so this scores as absent and is an open question. 25 + 15 + 0 + 5 + 15 + 0 = 60.
Spark-X2.6-4B 50
File safety 15 of 25, safetensors and GGUF only, but the card's Transformers and vLLM routes run the repository's Python. Provenance 15, the files are in SparkLLM's own Hub organisation, which its GitHub docs name, and every file has a checksum, though neither organisation is verified and no company site was found. Safety evaluation 0 and agent guidance 0, none published. Licence risk 15, plain Apache 2.0 that hasn't changed. Security programme 5 of 10, a private reporting route and email in SparkLLM's community repository, with no public advisories.
Agent interface LongCat-2.5 +5
LongCat-2.5 75
Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository (11,823 characters), with a copy in tokenizer_config.json. Tool-calling format 25, the card documents how tools are declared (the OpenAI function format) and how calls come back (tool_calls with an id, a name and JSON arguments, answered by a tool message), in a worked example against an OpenAI-compatible server. Trained tool calling 10, the card describes reinforcement learning on long agentic tasks and shows one tool call in a turn. Structured output 0, Nothing on the card about JSON or schema-constrained output. Reasoning control 10, enable_thinking on or off per request through chat_template_kwargs, with the reasoning returned as reasoning_content, both shown on the card. Context 10, the card states no context length, but config.json gives 524,288 positions and the card's own evaluations ran at 512K and 1M sequence lengths after what it calls long-context training, so 128K or more is taken as trained. 20 + 25 + 10 + 0 + 10 + 10 = 75.
Spark-X2.6-4B 70
Chat template 20, a Jinja file in the repository. Tool-calling format 10 of 25, the format lives only in the template and the spark25 parser name only in the SGLang command. Trained tool calling 20, the template renders several calls in one turn. Structured output 0, not documented. Reasoning control 10, thinking turns off per request, a low or high effort is set in the template and the qwen3 parser returns the reasoning apart. Context 10, 1,048,576 tokens with no scaling.
Documentation and upkeep Spark-X2.6-4B +5
LongCat-2.5 46
Model card 11, Intended use, limitations (the usage considerations), the architecture and the parameter counts are on the card. Training data 5, A general description of the training stages and where the reinforcement learning tasks came from, with no sources, sizes or cut-off. Last change 20, the last commit, on 10 November 2026, updated the card, on the day of this check. Responsiveness 0, Neither of the 2 discussions that aren't pull requests (9 and 10 November 2026) has a reply from a meituan-longcat member, counted on 10 November by author flags and dates with a script, text not read. Version policy 5, LongCat-2.0 stays in its own repositories and 2.5 came out in new ones, with no dated note on the older ones that we read. File health 5, the template is in both places and agrees, but config.json's auto_map names configuration_longcat_oe and modeling_longcat_oe, which aren't in the repository, and the tokenizer config's 131,072-token length is a quarter of the config's 524,288 positions. 11 + 5 + 20 + 0 + 5 + 5 = 46.
Spark-X2.6-4B 51
Model card 11 of 20, intended use, parameters, context and languages, with no limitations, cut-off or architecture description of its own. Training data 0, the X2.6 card describes none. Last change 20, the card changed on 1 November 2026. Responsiveness 10, SparkLLM members answered 11 of 40 discussions. Version policy 5, X2.5 stays in place with no note. File health 5, the tokenizer config's 131,072 disagrees with the 1M context.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | LongCat-2.5 | Spark-X2.6-4B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 35 | 85 | Spark-X2.6-4B +50 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 60 | 50 | LongCat-2.5 +10 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 75 | 70 | LongCat-2.5 +5 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 46 | 51 | Spark-X2.6-4B +5 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | D 50.5/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | LongCat-2.5 | Spark-X2.6-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Meituan (LongCat) | SparkLLM (XHToken) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-11-10 | 2026-10-20 |
| Terms last updated | not read yet | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Agent reviews | none | 3/5 (4) |
How the scores have moved
LongCat-2.5
No score change since it was listed.
Verdicts
LongCat-2.5
Meituan's flagship is MIT-licensed and documented for tool calling and switchable reasoning, with strong numbers of its own on agentic coding. Almost nobody can run it: 3,562 GB of weights, a 1,336 GB 4-bit build for NPU accelerators, and no released runtime with its architecture. A model to watch until a runtime or a provider picks it up.
Spark-X2.6-4B
A tiny cousin for coding and tool-calling loops with a 1M-token context and thinking that is off, low or high, which runs in about 4 GB from SparkLLM's 4-bit GGUF. Use llama.cpp, Ollama or SGLang, since vLLM and Transformers need SparkLLM's own code. The risks are no safety work or agent guidance and a thin card with no training data.
Before you call either
LongCat-2.5
- You can't run this on a workstation or a single GPU server. Plan for a provider, and none serves it yet
- If an operator serves it, call it as an OpenAI-compatible chat API with tools in the function format
- Pass
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingtrue or false - With thinking on, keep earlier reasoning in the history (
save_history_reasoning_contenttrue), as the card recommends - The card's results use temperature 1.0 and top_p 0.95
- Its benchmark table is Meituan's own. The unmarked scores are in-house
Spark-X2.6-4B
- Quickest start is
llama-server -hf XHToken/Spark-X2.6-4B-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinja, which needs llama.cpp b10828 or later, orollama run SparkLLM/Spark-X2.6-4B(8.2 GB, Ollama 0.34.1 or later) - For parsed tool calls serve it with SGLang 0.5.22 or later,
--tool-call-parser spark25 --reasoning-parser qwen3, since the calls come back as tool_call blocks with arg_key and arg_value pairs - Thinking is on by default. Pass
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse to turn it off, orreasoning_effortlow for short thinking; the template raises an error on any effort other than high or low - SparkLLM's recommended sampling is temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and top_k -1
- The template always opens with its own default system line, with the effort instruction, and puts your system message after the tool list
- The template raises an error if tool_call arguments are a JSON string, so pass them as an object
- Set the context yourself, the card's 1,048,576-token example needs far more memory than the weights
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, LongCat-2.5 or Spark-X2.6-4B?
Spark-X2.6-4B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against LongCat-2.5's 50.5 (D), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. LongCat-2.5 leads on risk and agent interface.
Other comparisons with LongCat-2.5 or Spark-X2.6-4B
- Agents-A1-4B vs LongCat-2.5
- Agents-A1-4B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs LongCat-2.5
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs LongCat-2.5
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Arete-27B vs LongCat-2.5
- Arete-27B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- BigBang-v1 vs LongCat-2.5
- BigBang-v1 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Carbon-X vs LongCat-2.5
- Carbon-X vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Cola2 vs LongCat-2.5
- Cola2 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs LongCat-2.5
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs LongCat-2.5
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs LongCat-2.5
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs LongCat-2.5
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs LongCat-2.5
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Devstral Small 2 vs LongCat-2.5
- Devstral Small 2 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs LongCat-2.5
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs LongCat-2.5
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs LongCat-2.5
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs LongCat-2.5
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs LongCat-2.5
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs LongCat-2.5
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs LongCat-2.5
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs LongCat-2.5
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs LongCat-2.5
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs LongCat-2.5
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- GLM-5.3 vs LongCat-2.5
- GLM-5.3 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- gpt-oss-120b vs LongCat-2.5
- gpt-oss-120b vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- gpt-oss-20b vs LongCat-2.5
- gpt-oss-20b vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs LongCat-2.5
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs LongCat-2.5
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs LongCat-2.5
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs LongCat-2.5
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Hy3 vs LongCat-2.5
- Hy3 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Inkling-Small vs LongCat-2.5
- Inkling-Small vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Inkling vs LongCat-2.5
- Inkling vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs LongCat-2.5
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs LongCat-2.5
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Kimi K3 vs LongCat-2.5
- Kimi K3 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Kolibri-1 vs LongCat-2.5
- Kolibri-1 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Kronos vs LongCat-2.5
- Kronos vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Laguna M.1 vs LongCat-2.5
- Laguna M.1 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs LongCat-2.5
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs LongCat-2.5
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- LBS-27B vs LongCat-2.5
- LBS-27B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs LongCat-2.5
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- LFM3-1.7B vs LongCat-2.5
- LFM3-1.7B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs LongCat-2.5
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs LongCat-2.5
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs LongCat-2.5
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs LongCat-2.5
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs LongCat-2.5
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- LongCat-2.5 vs Mistral Large 4
- LongCat-2.5 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- LongCat-2.5 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- LongCat-2.5 vs North Mini Code 1.0
- LongCat-2.5 vs occamy-1.0
- LongCat-2.5 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- LongCat-2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- LongCat-2.5 vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- LongCat-2.5 vs Recursive Flint
- LongCat-2.5 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- LongCat-2.5 vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- LongCat-2.5 vs SmolLM3-3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- LongCat-2.5 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LongCat-2.5 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- LongCat-2.5 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- LongCat-2.5 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- LongCat-2.5 vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- LongCat-2.5 vs ZAYA1-8B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- occamy-1.0 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.6-27B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Recursive Flint vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ripple-65B Preview vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- SmolLM3-3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Spark-X2.6-4B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Spark-X2.6-4B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Spark-X2.6-4B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Spark-X2.6-4B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Spark-X2.6-4B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Spark-X2.6-4B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Spark-X2.6-4B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Spark-X2.6-4B vs ZAYA1-8B
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/longcat-2-5-vs-spark-x2-6-4b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/longcat-2-5.json·/api/v1/tools/spark-x2-6-4b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare longcat-2-5 spark-x2-6-4b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "longcat-2-5", "b": "spark-x2-6-4b"}at/mcp, no key