Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
MiniCPM5-2B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
Spark-X2.6-4B and MiniCPM5-2B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 60.2 (C). MiniCPM5-2B leads on reach, risk, agent interface and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for On-device and laptop agents that want a 2 GB tool-calling helper with long context and open training data
Ahead on
- Reach, 90 against 85
- Risk, 55 against 50
- Agent interface, 75 against 70
- Documentation and upkeep, 97 against 41
Watch for
OpenBMB documents only a Think mode for the 2B, so every answer starts with reasoning
Best for Agents that want a tiny local model for tool loops and long documents on a laptop, CPU or small GPU.
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
No safety results and no agent or prompt-injection guidance
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | MiniCPM5-2B | Spark-X2.6-4B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 90 | 85 | MiniCPM5-2B +5 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 55 | 50 | MiniCPM5-2B +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 75 | 70 | MiniCPM5-2B +5 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 97 | 41 | MiniCPM5-2B +56 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 60.2/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | MiniCPM5-2B | Spark-X2.6-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | OpenBMB | SparkLLM (XHToken) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-09-29 | 2026-10-20 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (4) | 3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
MiniCPM5-2B
A tiny dense cousin for local tool calling and long context, with published training data and an active publisher. OpenBMB's own 4-bit builds need about 2 GB, so it runs on a laptop or phone in vLLM, SGLang, llama.cpp, Ollama or Transformers. The main risks are always-on thinking, no safety results and use conditions beyond Apache 2.0.
Spark-X2.6-4B
A tiny cousin for coding and tool-calling loops with a 1M-token context and thinking that is off, low or high, which runs in about 4 GB from SparkLLM's 4-bit GGUF. Use llama.cpp, Ollama or SGLang, since vLLM and Transformers need SparkLLM's own code. The risks are no safety work or agent guidance and a thin, two-day-old card.
Before you call either
MiniCPM5-2B
- Smallest start is
ollama run openbmb/minicpm5-2b(1.6 GB, q4_k_m) - On vLLM 0.29.0 or later run
vllm serve openbmb/MiniCPM5-2B --max-model-len 131072 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser minicpm5, or tool calls come back as XML text - On SGLang 0.5.16 or later add
--tool-call-parser minicpm5 --reasoning-parser qwen3; SGLang is OpenBMB's recommended backend for tool calls - Tool calls are XML,
<function name=...><param name=...>, not Hermes JSON - Sample with temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and min_p 0.0; llama.cpp's default min_p 0.05 can loop, and repetition_penalty 1.05 helps if it does
- Expect a
<think>block before every answer and leave room in max_tokens; enable_thinking false is accepted by the template but OpenBMB doesn't support it for the 2B - Validate JSON yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since structured output isn't documented
- Use the main repository's template; the GGUF, MLX and GPTQ copies predate the 29 September fix
Spark-X2.6-4B
- Quickest start is
llama-server -hf XHToken/Spark-X2.6-4B-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinja, which needs llama.cpp b10828 or later, orollama run SparkLLM/Spark-X2.6-4B(8.2 GB, Ollama 0.34.1 or later) - For parsed tool calls serve it with SGLang 0.5.22 or later,
--tool-call-parser spark25 --reasoning-parser qwen3, since the calls come back as tool_call blocks with arg_key and arg_value pairs - Thinking is on by default. Pass
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse to turn it off, orreasoning_effortlow for short thinking; the template raises an error on any effort other than high or low - SparkLLM's recommended sampling is temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and top_k -1
- The template always opens with its own default system line, with the effort instruction, and puts your system message after the tool list
- The template raises an error if tool_call arguments are a JSON string, so pass them as an object
- Set the context yourself, the card's 1,048,576-token example needs far more memory than the weights
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, MiniCPM5-2B or Spark-X2.6-4B?
Spark-X2.6-4B and MiniCPM5-2B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 60.2 (C). MiniCPM5-2B leads on reach, risk, agent interface and documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with MiniCPM5-2B or Spark-X2.6-4B
- Agents-A1-4B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- BigBang-v1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- BigBang-v1 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniCPM5-2B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs MiniCPM5-2B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniCPM5-2B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs MiniCPM5-2B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- GLM-5.3 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiniCPM5-2B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniCPM5-2B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Hy3 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Hy3 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Inkling-Small vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Inkling-Small vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Inkling vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Inkling vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs MiniCPM5-2B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Kimi K3 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Kimi K3 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Kolibri-1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Kolibri-1 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Laguna M.1 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- MiniCPM5-2B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs occamy-1.0
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniCPM5-2B vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM5-2B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- occamy-1.0 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.6-27B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- SmolLM3-3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Spark-X2.6-4B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Spark-X2.6-4B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Spark-X2.6-4B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/minicpm5-2b-vs-spark-x2-6-4b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/minicpm5-2b.json·/api/v1/tools/spark-x2-6-4b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare minicpm5-2b spark-x2-6-4b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "minicpm5-2b", "b": "spark-x2-6-4b"}at/mcp, no key