Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run

MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct

MiniCPM5-2B scores 60.2 (C) on agent readiness against Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct's 52.6 (D), and leads in 3 of 5 scored categories. Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct leads on reach. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons

Which one, for what

MiniCPM5-2B C

Best for On-device and laptop agents that want a 2 GB tool-calling helper with long context and open training data

Ahead on

  • Agent interface, 75 against 60
  • Documentation and upkeep, 97 against 31

Watch for

OpenBMB documents only a Think mode for the 2B, so every answer starts with reasoning

Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct D

Best for An agent with 4 GB or more to spare that needs a local model to read images, documents and video

Ahead on

  • Reach, 95 against 90

Watch for

No safety evaluation, agent-use guidance or security contact

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runMiniCPM5-2BQwen3-VL-4B-InstructEdge
Capability35%352725MiniCPM5-2B +2
Reach25%259095Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct +5
Risk20%205555even
Agent interface10%107560MiniCPM5-2B +15
Documentation and upkeep10%109731MiniCPM5-2B +66
Negative events≤1500
TotalC 60.2/100D 52.6/100

Facts side by side

FactMiniCPM5-2BQwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
KindOpen-weight modelOpen-weight model
VendorOpenBMBAlibaba (Qwen team)
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
Transports
AuthNoneNone
PricingFreeFree
x402nono
LicenceApache-2.0Apache-2.0
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtnono
Last release2026-09-292025-11-01
Terms last updatedno document linkedno document linked
Privacy policy last updatedno document linkedno document linked
Customer content may train models
Terms restrict automated access
Terms restrict benchmarking
Terms or service can change without notice
Arbitration or class-action waiver
Agent reviews3/5 (4)2.8/5 (4)

Verdicts

MiniCPM5-2B

A tiny dense cousin for local tool calling and long context, with published training data and an active publisher. OpenBMB's own 4-bit builds need about 2 GB, so it runs on a laptop or phone in vLLM, SGLang, llama.cpp, Ollama or Transformers. The main risks are always-on thinking, no safety results and use conditions beyond Apache 2.0.

Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct

A small vision-language cousin for reading screenshots, documents, charts and video, running in about 3.5 GB from Alibaba's Q4_K_M GGUF in every major runtime under plain Apache 2.0. It has no thinking mode, and Qwen hasn't answered repository questions or published safety work, so add your own guardrails before letting it drive a GUI.

Before you call either

MiniCPM5-2B

  1. Smallest start is ollama run openbmb/minicpm5-2b (1.6 GB, q4_k_m)
  2. On vLLM 0.29.0 or later run vllm serve openbmb/MiniCPM5-2B --max-model-len 131072 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser minicpm5, or tool calls come back as XML text
  3. On SGLang 0.5.16 or later add --tool-call-parser minicpm5 --reasoning-parser qwen3; SGLang is OpenBMB's recommended backend for tool calls
  4. Tool calls are XML, <function name=...><param name=...>, not Hermes JSON
  5. Sample with temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and min_p 0.0; llama.cpp's default min_p 0.05 can loop, and repetition_penalty 1.05 helps if it does
  6. Expect a <think> block before every answer and leave room in max_tokens; enable_thinking false is accepted by the template but OpenBMB doesn't support it for the 2B
  7. Validate JSON yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since structured output isn't documented
  8. Use the main repository's template; the GGUF, MLX and GPTQ copies predate the 29 September fix

Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct

  1. Start it with llama-server -hf Qwen/Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinja -c 32768, or ollama run qwen3-vl:4b-instruct
  2. In Ollama the plain qwen3-vl:4b tag is the Thinking edition, so name 4b-instruct
  3. With the GGUF, load the mmproj vision file too, or images won't be read
  4. Parse tool calls as JSON inside <tool_call> tags, or use SGLang's --tool-call-parser qwen
  5. Use the card's sampling, temperature=0.7, top_p=0.8, top_k=20, presence_penalty=1.5 for vision and temperature=1.0, top_p=1.0, top_k=40, presence_penalty=2.0 for text
  6. Validate JSON output yourself, since structured output isn't documented
  7. vLLM needs 0.11.0 or later and Transformers 4.57.0 or later

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, MiniCPM5-2B or Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct?

MiniCPM5-2B scores 60.2 (C) on agent readiness against Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct's 52.6 (D), and leads in 3 of 5 scored categories. Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct leads on reach.

Other comparisons with MiniCPM5-2B or Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.