Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
LongCat-2.5 vs MiniMax-M2.7
MiniMax-M2.7 scores 57.6 (C) on agent readiness against LongCat-2.5's 50.5 (D), and leads in 1 of 4 scored categories. LongCat-2.5 leads on risk. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 6359 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Operators with NPU clusters, and anyone tracking what the open flagships can do
Ahead on
- Risk, 60 against 30
Watch for
3,562 GB in BF16 and 1,336 GB at 4 bits
Best for Researchers and personal projects with a 4 to 8 GPU server who want an open agent and coding model with parallel tool calls
Ahead on
- Reach, 60 against 35
Watch for
Commercial use needs MiniMax's written authorisation since a licence swap on 11 April 2026, made without a note
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Risk LongCat-2.5 +30
LongCat-2.5 60
File safety 25, safetensors only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files and no Python in the repository. Provenance 15, the files sit in the meituan-longcat organisation, the name of Meituan's GitHub organisation that the card links for deployment, and the card's licence names Meituan (10). Safety evaluation 0, no safety results on the card. Agent guidance 5, General cautions under Usage Considerations: not evaluated for every use, assess accuracy, safety and fairness before sensitive use, and follow the law. Licence risk 15, MIT with no use policy, no threshold and no right to change the terms. Security programme 0, no way to report a flaw on the card beyond a general contact, and Meituan's own security pages weren't looked up, so this scores as absent and is an open question. 25 + 15 + 0 + 5 + 15 + 0 = 60.
MiniMax-M2.7 30
File safety earns 15, safetensors only with no pickle files, less 10 because every documented loading route passes trust_remote_code for the repository's Python. Provenance earns the full 15, files in the organisation MiniMax links to with a SHA-256 for each shard. Safety evaluation and agent guidance earn nothing, as MiniMax publishes neither. Licence risk earns nothing (read 21 October 2026). The Prohibited Uses appendix goes beyond the law, MiniMax swapped a commercial licence for a non-commercial one two days after release, and neither that swap nor the amendment three days later carries a dated note. The security programme earns nothing, with no security.txt, disclosure policy, SECURITY.md or advisories.
Reach MiniMax-M2.7 +25
LongCat-2.5 35
Memory 0, the smallest build is Meituan's W4A4 repository, 1,336 GB, and 1,336 GB × 1.2 = 1,603 GB, far above 256 GB. The BF16 files are 3,562 GB. Runtimes 0, none of the six runs it in a released version: vLLM 0.33.0, SGLang 0.5.23, Transformers 5.22.2 and llama.cpp b12242 have no LongcatCausalLM or pro_v code, and the model code config.json names isn't in the repository. Builds 10, one quantised build from Meituan, the W4A4 repository (4-bit experts, 1,336 GB). Terms 15, MIT in the metadata, the LICENSE file and the card, with nothing added. Download 10, the Hub API reports gated false for both repositories on 10 November 2026, so the files download with no account and nothing to accept. Hosted 0, Hugging Face maps no inference provider to it. 0 + 0 + 10 + 15 + 10 + 0 = 35.
MiniMax-M2.7 60
Memory earns 5. MiniMax only publishes its 230 GB FP8 release, and the smallest build of 4-bit or better from a runtime's own library is LM Studio's Q4_K_M GGUF at 138.3 GB, about 166 GB with the fifth added, so it needs more than our 107.4 GB machine and fits within 256 GB. Runtimes earn the full 25, with model code in released vLLM, SGLang, llama.cpp and Transformers, an LM Studio catalogue entry, and Ollama 0.40.14, whose pinned llama.cpp b11963 has the minimax-m2 architecture (capped at 25). Builds earn 10 for one publisher precision, the FP8 release. Terms earn 5, since the licence today allows only personal, research and non-profit use without MiniMax's written authorisation. Download earns 10, with no gate or account. Hosted earns 5, since Novita, Featherless AI and DeepInfra serve it through Hugging Face, while MiniMax's own API is closed to new users and retires it on 18 November 2026.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | LongCat-2.5 | MiniMax-M2.7 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 35 | 60 | MiniMax-M2.7 +25 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 60 | 30 | LongCat-2.5 +30 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 75 | 75 | even |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 46 | 42 | LongCat-2.5 +4 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | D 50.5/100 | C 57.6/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | LongCat-2.5 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Meituan (LongCat) | MiniMax |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | MiniMax M2.7 non-commercial licence (MIT-style terms, commercial use needs MiniMax's written authorisation) |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-11-10 | 2026-04-20 |
| Terms last updated | not read yet | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Agent reviews | none | 1.8/5 (4) |
How the scores have moved
LongCat-2.5
No score change since it was listed.
Verdicts
LongCat-2.5
Meituan's flagship is MIT-licensed and documented for tool calling and switchable reasoning, with strong numbers of its own on agentic coding. Almost nobody can run it: 3,562 GB of weights, a 1,336 GB 4-bit build for NPU accelerators, and no released runtime with its architecture. A model to watch until a runtime or a provider picks it up.
MiniMax-M2.7
A 230B mixture-of-experts model for coding and agent harnesses, with parallel tool calls, about 200K of context and parsers in vLLM and SGLang. It needs a 4 GPU server for FP8 or about 166 GB for a 4-bit library build, and it always thinks. The main risk is the licence, switched to non-commercial two days after release.
Before you call either
LongCat-2.5
- You can't run this on a workstation or a single GPU server. Plan for a provider, and none serves it yet
- If an operator serves it, call it as an OpenAI-compatible chat API with tools in the function format
- Pass
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingtrue or false - With thinking on, keep earlier reasoning in the history (
save_history_reasoning_contenttrue), as the card recommends - The card's results use temperature 1.0 and top_p 0.95
- Its benchmark table is Meituan's own. The unmarked scores are in-house
MiniMax-M2.7
- Check the use is personal, research or non-profit before starting it; anything commercial needs MiniMax's written authorisation, and commercial users must show Built with MiniMax M2.7
- Start it with vLLM on 4 GPUs of 96 GB, SAFETENSORS_FAST_GPU=1 vllm serve MiniMaxAI/MiniMax-M2.7 --trust-remote-code --tensor-parallel-size 4 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser minimax_m2 --reasoning-parser minimax_m2_append_think
- In SGLang use --tool-call-parser minimax-m2 and --reasoning-parser minimax-append-think, with --trust-remote-code
- MiniMax's guides budget 220 GB for the weights and 240 GB per 1M tokens of KV cache, with 196K the most per sequence
- On one large-memory machine, LM Studio's catalogue entry minimax/minimax-m2.7 lists a 138 GB Q4_K_M GGUF and states 138 GB minimum memory
- Sample with temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and top_k 40, as the card recommends, and budget output tokens for thinking on every turn
- Pin Transformers 4.57.1 as MiniMax's guide does; a report that it fails on Transformers v5 has no answer
- Without the hardware, call it through Novita, Featherless AI or DeepInfra; MiniMax's own API retires M2.7 on 18 November 2026
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, LongCat-2.5 or MiniMax-M2.7?
MiniMax-M2.7 scores 57.6 (C) on agent readiness against LongCat-2.5's 50.5 (D), and leads in 1 of 4 scored categories. LongCat-2.5 leads on risk.
Other comparisons with LongCat-2.5 or MiniMax-M2.7
- Agents-A1-4B vs LongCat-2.5
- Agents-A1-4B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs LongCat-2.5
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs LongCat-2.5
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Arete-27B vs LongCat-2.5
- Arete-27B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- BigBang-v1 vs LongCat-2.5
- BigBang-v1 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Carbon-X vs LongCat-2.5
- Carbon-X vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Cola2 vs LongCat-2.5
- Cola2 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs LongCat-2.5
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs LongCat-2.5
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs MiniMax-M2.7
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs LongCat-2.5
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs LongCat-2.5
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniMax-M2.7
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs LongCat-2.5
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Devstral Small 2 vs LongCat-2.5
- Devstral Small 2 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs LongCat-2.5
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiniMax-M2.7
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs LongCat-2.5
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs LongCat-2.5
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs LongCat-2.5
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs LongCat-2.5
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs LongCat-2.5
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs LongCat-2.5
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs MiniMax-M2.7
- GLM-4.5-Air vs LongCat-2.5
- GLM-4.5-Air vs MiniMax-M2.7
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs LongCat-2.5
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniMax-M2.7
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs LongCat-2.5
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs MiniMax-M2.7
- GLM-5.3 vs LongCat-2.5
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- gpt-oss-120b vs LongCat-2.5
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiniMax-M2.7
- gpt-oss-20b vs LongCat-2.5
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Granite 4.2 30B vs LongCat-2.5
- Granite 4.2 30B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Granite 4.2 3B vs LongCat-2.5
- Granite 4.2 3B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Granite 4.2 8B vs LongCat-2.5
- Granite 4.2 8B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs LongCat-2.5
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Hy3 vs LongCat-2.5
- Hy3 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Inkling-Small vs LongCat-2.5
- Inkling-Small vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Inkling vs LongCat-2.5
- Inkling vs MiniMax-M2.7
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs LongCat-2.5
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs LongCat-2.5
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Kimi K3 vs LongCat-2.5
- Kimi K3 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Kolibri-1 vs LongCat-2.5
- Kolibri-1 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Kronos vs LongCat-2.5
- Kronos vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Laguna M.1 vs LongCat-2.5
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Laguna S 2.1 vs LongCat-2.5
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs LongCat-2.5
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- LBS-27B vs LongCat-2.5
- LBS-27B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs LongCat-2.5
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- LFM3-1.7B vs LongCat-2.5
- LFM3-1.7B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs LongCat-2.5
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs LongCat-2.5
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- LFM3-VL-2B vs LongCat-2.5
- LFM3-VL-2B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs LongCat-2.5
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs LongCat-2.5
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- LongCat-2.5 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- LongCat-2.5 vs Mistral Large 4
- LongCat-2.5 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- LongCat-2.5 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- LongCat-2.5 vs North Mini Code 1.0
- LongCat-2.5 vs occamy-1.0
- LongCat-2.5 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- LongCat-2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- LongCat-2.5 vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- LongCat-2.5 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- LongCat-2.5 vs Recursive Flint
- LongCat-2.5 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- LongCat-2.5 vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- LongCat-2.5 vs SmolLM3-3B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- LongCat-2.5 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- LongCat-2.5 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LongCat-2.5 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- LongCat-2.5 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- LongCat-2.5 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- LongCat-2.5 vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- LongCat-2.5 vs ZAYA1-8B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiniCPM5-2B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Mistral Large 4
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs North Mini Code 1.0
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs occamy-1.0
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Recursive Flint
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs ZAYA1-8B
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/longcat-2-5-vs-minimax-m2-7.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/longcat-2-5.json·/api/v1/tools/minimax-m2-7.json - From a terminal
anchor compare longcat-2-5 minimax-m2-7(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "longcat-2-5", "b": "minimax-m2-7"}at/mcp, no key