Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
LBS-27B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
LBS-27B scores 53.9 (D) on agent readiness against MiniMax-M3.1-Flash's 50.5 (D), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 3504 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
LBS-27B D
Best for Agents with about 96 GB of GPU memory that need to find click targets on dense professional screenshots, or read fine detail in large images, and can run a small crop loop and wait for independent results.
Ahead on
- Reach, 55 against 40
- Risk, 50 against 35
Watch for
No independent benchmark result yet; ScreenSpot-Pro, OS-World-G, PerceptionBench and HR-Bench numbers are inclusionAI's own runs
Best for Teams with a 4 to 8 GPU server who want an open multimodal agent and coding model with 1M tokens of context and can meet the licence's attribution and notice terms.
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
No released vLLM or SGLang ran it on 24 October 2026; only llama.cpp b11861 from that day did
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | LBS-27B | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 55 | 40 | LBS-27B +15 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 50 | 35 | LBS-27B +15 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 70 | 70 | even |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 43 | 41 | LBS-27B +2 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | D 53.9/100 | D 50.5/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | LBS-27B | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | inclusionAI (Ant Group) | MiniMax |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 (the card's metadata and licence section; the LICENSE file sits in the GitHub repository inclusionAI/UI-Venus on its LBS branch, not in the Hugging Face repository) | MiniMax Community License (custom; commercial use needs a "Built with MiniMax M3.1-Flash" line and a one-time notice to MiniMax, and MiniMax's written authorisation above $20M yearly revenue) |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-26 | 2026-10-23 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | none | 2.3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
LBS-27B
A 27B Qwen3.8 fine-tune for GUI grounding that zooms into screenshots over a few turns before naming a point, and inclusionAI says it also helps with fine detail in large images. It needs about 96 GB at BF16 and a client that runs its crop actions. Every result so far is inclusionAI's own, with no safety results or injection guidance.
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
A 428B mixture-of-experts model, 23B active, for agent work, coding and computer use, with image and video input, about 1M tokens of context and parallel tool calls. It needs a 4 to 8 GPU server for 250 GB of NVFP4 and MXFP8 weights, and vLLM and SGLang support was pre-release on 24 October 2026. Commercial use needs attribution and notice.
Before you call either
LBS-27B
- Serve with
vllm serve inclusionAI/LBS-27B --tensor-parallel-size 4 --max-model-len 65536, which is what the card's wrapper script runs; keep the context at 32,768 or more for multi-turn images - Build the system prompt with
build_system_promptfrom the LBS branch'szoomin_grounding_protocol.py, send the screenshot afterimage_path: <name>, and don't passtools; the model answers in plain text - Parse
<action>crop_image(image_path=..., x1=..., y1=..., x2=..., y2=...)</action>, cut the crop yourself and return it with its mapping to the original image; allow at most two crops per turn and three per episode - Read the final answer as
[x.xx,y.yy]on a 0 to 1000 scale of the original image, and use your own executor to click - Pass
reasoning_effortasxhigh,mediumorlowonly, since the template raises an error forhigh, and don't count onthinking_budget, which the template ignores - Don't turn on MTP speculative decoding; the MTP weights aren't in the repository though config.json names one MTP layer
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Check the use case first; commercial products must show "Built with MiniMax M3.1-Flash" and notify MiniMax once, or get written authorisation above $20M yearly revenue
- On 8 H100 or H200 GPUs use vLLM's nightly image vllm/vllm-openai:minimax-m31-flash with --tensor-parallel-size 8 --block-size 128 --kv-cache-dtype fp8 --moe-backend marlin --max-model-len 262144
- Pass --reasoning-parser minimax_m3 --tool-call-parser minimax_m3 --enable-auto-tool-choice in vLLM, or minimax-m3 for both in SGLang with --trust-remote-code
- --block-size 128 is mandatory in vLLM, since MSA's sparse block size is 128
- Set effort per request with chat_template_kwargs reasoning_effort (low, medium, high, xhigh, max); sample at temperature 1.0 and top_p 0.95
- On Blackwell or MI355X, 4 GPUs serve it with the DSpark draft from dspark/; vLLM's Hopper command leaves DSpark off and turns video input off
- For GGUF builds by others, use llama.cpp b11861 or later; earlier builds mis-scale the NVFP4 experts and produce garbage
- Without the hardware, call MiniMax-M3.1-Flash on MiniMax's API (minimax-api), whose thinking defaults to max effort
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, LBS-27B or MiniMax-M3.1-Flash?
LBS-27B scores 53.9 (D) on agent readiness against MiniMax-M3.1-Flash's 50.5 (D), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories.
Other comparisons with LBS-27B or MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Agents-A1-4B vs LBS-27B
- Agents-A1-4B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs LBS-27B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs LBS-27B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- BigBang-v1 vs LBS-27B
- BigBang-v1 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Carbon-X vs LBS-27B
- Carbon-X vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs LBS-27B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs LBS-27B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs LBS-27B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs LBS-27B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs LBS-27B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs LBS-27B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs LBS-27B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs LBS-27B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs LBS-27B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs LBS-27B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs LBS-27B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- GLM-4.5-Air vs LBS-27B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs LBS-27B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs LBS-27B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- GLM-5.3 vs LBS-27B
- GLM-5.3 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- gpt-oss-120b vs LBS-27B
- gpt-oss-120b vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- gpt-oss-20b vs LBS-27B
- gpt-oss-20b vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Granite 4.2 3B vs LBS-27B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Hy3 vs LBS-27B
- Hy3 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Inkling-Small vs LBS-27B
- Inkling-Small vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Inkling vs LBS-27B
- Inkling vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs LBS-27B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Kimi K3 vs LBS-27B
- Kimi K3 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Kolibri-1 vs LBS-27B
- Kolibri-1 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Kronos vs LBS-27B
- Kronos vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Laguna M.1 vs LBS-27B
- Laguna M.1 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Laguna S 2.1 vs LBS-27B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs LBS-27B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- LBS-27B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- LBS-27B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- LBS-27B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- LBS-27B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- LBS-27B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- LBS-27B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- LBS-27B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- LBS-27B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- LBS-27B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- LBS-27B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- LBS-27B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- LBS-27B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- LBS-27B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- LBS-27B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- LBS-27B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- LBS-27B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- LBS-27B vs occamy-1.0
- LBS-27B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- LBS-27B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- LBS-27B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- LBS-27B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- LBS-27B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- LBS-27B vs Recursive Flint
- LBS-27B vs SmolLM3-3B
- LBS-27B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- LBS-27B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- LBS-27B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LBS-27B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- LBS-27B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- MiniCPM5-2B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs occamy-1.0
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.5-2B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.5-4B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.6-27B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Recursive Flint
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs SmolLM3-3B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/lbs-27b-vs-minimax-m3-1-flash.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/lbs-27b.json·/api/v1/tools/minimax-m3-1-flash.json - From a terminal
anchor compare lbs-27b minimax-m3-1-flash(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "lbs-27b", "b": "minimax-m3-1-flash"}at/mcp, no key