Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
LBS-27B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
LBS-27B scores 53.9 (D) on agent readiness against Olmo 3 7B Think's 52.3 (D), and leads in 1 of 4 scored categories. Olmo 3 7B Think leads on reach, risk and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 3504 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
LBS-27B D
Best for Agents with about 96 GB of GPU memory that need to find click targets on dense professional screenshots, or read fine detail in large images, and can run a small crop loop and wait for independent results.
Ahead on
- Agent interface, 70 against 35
Watch for
No independent benchmark result yet; ScreenSpot-Pro, OS-World-G, PerceptionBench and HR-Bench numbers are inclusionAI's own runs
Best for Researchers and agents that want a small fully open reasoning model for maths and code, with its training data on hand
Ahead on
- Reach, 75 against 55
- Risk, 75 against 50
- Documentation and upkeep, 52 against 43
Watch for
Not trained for tool calling, and the tool format lives only in the template
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | LBS-27B | Olmo 3 7B Think | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 55 | 75 | Olmo 3 7B Think +20 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 50 | 75 | Olmo 3 7B Think +25 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 70 | 35 | LBS-27B +35 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 43 | 52 | Olmo 3 7B Think +9 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | D 53.9/100 | D 52.3/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | LBS-27B | Olmo 3 7B Think |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | inclusionAI (Ant Group) | Ai2 (Allen Institute for AI) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 (the card's metadata and licence section; the LICENSE file sits in the GitHub repository inclusionAI/UI-Venus on its LBS branch, not in the Hugging Face repository) | Apache-2.0, with Ai2's Responsible Use Guidelines named on the card |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-26 | 2026-06-25 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | none | 2.8/5 (4) |
Verdicts
LBS-27B
A 27B Qwen3.8 fine-tune for GUI grounding that zooms into screenshots over a few turns before naming a point, and inclusionAI says it also helps with fine detail in large images. It needs about 96 GB at BF16 and a client that runs its crop actions. Every result so far is inclusionAI's own, with no safety results or injection guidance.
Olmo 3 7B Think
A fully open 7B reasoning cousin for maths, code and step-by-step answers, with every dataset and checkpoint published and its safety results rerunnable. Ollama's 4-bit build needs about 5.4 GB. It always thinks, wasn't trained for tool calls, has 65K of context, and Ai2 hasn't answered its discussions.
Before you call either
LBS-27B
- Serve with
vllm serve inclusionAI/LBS-27B --tensor-parallel-size 4 --max-model-len 65536, which is what the card's wrapper script runs; keep the context at 32,768 or more for multi-turn images - Build the system prompt with
build_system_promptfrom the LBS branch'szoomin_grounding_protocol.py, send the screenshot afterimage_path: <name>, and don't passtools; the model answers in plain text - Parse
<action>crop_image(image_path=..., x1=..., y1=..., x2=..., y2=...)</action>, cut the crop yourself and return it with its mapping to the original image; allow at most two crops per turn and three per episode - Read the final answer as
[x.xx,y.yy]on a 0 to 1000 scale of the original image, and use your own executor to click - Pass
reasoning_effortasxhigh,mediumorlowonly, since the template raises an error forhigh, and don't count onthinking_budget, which the template ignores - Don't turn on MTP speculative decoding; the MTP weights aren't in the repository though config.json names one MTP layer
Olmo 3 7B Think
- Quickest start is
ollama run olmo-3:7b-think, about 4.5 GB - With vLLM,
vllm serve allenai/Olmo-3-7B-Think --max-model-len 65536; vLLM runs it through its Transformers backend - Sample at temperature 0.6 and top_p 0.95 with up to 32,768 output tokens, as the card recommends, since thinking traces are long
- Every reply starts with a think block; strip it yourself or use a reasoning parser that reads think tags
- Pass your own system prompt; the template's default says the cut-off is November 2024 and that no functions are available
- For tool calls use Olmo 3 7B Instruct instead, which Ai2 trained for function calling
- A discussion reports endless reasoning loops when served with vLLM, unanswered, so cap max_tokens
- Check the use against Ai2's Responsible Use Guidelines, which bar automated social-media posting and undisclosed automated content outside research
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, LBS-27B or Olmo 3 7B Think?
LBS-27B scores 53.9 (D) on agent readiness against Olmo 3 7B Think's 52.3 (D), and leads in 1 of 4 scored categories. Olmo 3 7B Think leads on reach, risk and documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with LBS-27B or Olmo 3 7B Think
- Agents-A1-4B vs LBS-27B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs LBS-27B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs LBS-27B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- BigBang-v1 vs LBS-27B
- BigBang-v1 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Carbon-X vs LBS-27B
- Carbon-X vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs LBS-27B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs LBS-27B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs LBS-27B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs LBS-27B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs LBS-27B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs LBS-27B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs LBS-27B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs LBS-27B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs LBS-27B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs LBS-27B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs LBS-27B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- GLM-4.5-Air vs LBS-27B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs LBS-27B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs LBS-27B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- GLM-5.3 vs LBS-27B
- GLM-5.3 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- gpt-oss-120b vs LBS-27B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- gpt-oss-20b vs LBS-27B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Granite 4.2 3B vs LBS-27B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Hy3 vs LBS-27B
- Hy3 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Inkling-Small vs LBS-27B
- Inkling-Small vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Inkling vs LBS-27B
- Inkling vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs LBS-27B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Kimi K3 vs LBS-27B
- Kimi K3 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Kolibri-1 vs LBS-27B
- Kolibri-1 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Kronos vs LBS-27B
- Kronos vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Laguna M.1 vs LBS-27B
- Laguna M.1 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Laguna S 2.1 vs LBS-27B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs LBS-27B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- LBS-27B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- LBS-27B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- LBS-27B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- LBS-27B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- LBS-27B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- LBS-27B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- LBS-27B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- LBS-27B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- LBS-27B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- LBS-27B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- LBS-27B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- LBS-27B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- LBS-27B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- LBS-27B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- LBS-27B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- LBS-27B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- LBS-27B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- LBS-27B vs occamy-1.0
- LBS-27B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- LBS-27B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- LBS-27B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- LBS-27B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- LBS-27B vs Recursive Flint
- LBS-27B vs SmolLM3-3B
- LBS-27B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- LBS-27B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- LBS-27B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LBS-27B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- LBS-27B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- occamy-1.0 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Recursive Flint
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs SmolLM3-3B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/lbs-27b-vs-olmo-3-7b-think.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/lbs-27b.json·/api/v1/tools/olmo-3-7b-think.json - From a terminal
anchor compare lbs-27b olmo-3-7b-think(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "lbs-27b", "b": "olmo-3-7b-think"}at/mcp, no key