Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.5-9B
Qwen3.5-9B scores 60.5 (C) on agent readiness against Kimi K3.1 Pro's 48.6 (D), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. Kimi K3.1 Pro leads on documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 4969 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Operators with a multi-accelerator node who want Moonshot's newest open-weight model for coding and long agent sessions, and everyone else through an API
Ahead on
- Documentation and upkeep, 51 against 34
Watch for
1,561 GB of files, so it needs a node of eight large accelerators at least
Best for Agents that want a small multimodal tool-calling model on a laptop or a 16 GB GPU, under a plain licence
Ahead on
- Reach, 85 against 40
- Risk, 55 against 50
- Agent interface, 70 against 65
Watch for
No quantised build from Qwen itself
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Reach Qwen3.5-9B +45
Kimi K3.1 Pro 40
Memory 0, the only build is Moonshot's 1,561 GB MXFP4 release, far above 256 GB. Runtimes 5, llama.cpp b12242 alone has the model code in a release, since vLLM's recipe needs 0.34.0 and SGLang's cookbook a branch. Builds 10, one precision. Terms 10, free commercial use below a model-as-a-service revenue threshold. Download 10, not gated. Hosted 5, Moonshot's API and Together serve it. 0 + 5 + 10 + 10 + 10 + 5 = 40.
Qwen3.5-9B 85
Memory 30, Qwen publishes no quantised 9B, so the smallest 4-bit build from a runtime's own library is Ollama's qwen3.5:9b at 6.6 GB, about 7.9 GB with the fifth added, well under 16 GB. Runtimes 25, the cap, with vLLM listed in its stable docs, Transformers at released tags, llama.cpp, Ollama's library, LM Studio's own catalogue and SGLang all running the architecture. Builds 0, Qwen's FP8 and GPTQ repositories cover only the 27B and larger Qwen3.5 models, so every quantisation of the 9B is someone else's. Terms 15, plain Apache 2.0. Download 10, the repository isn't gated. Hosted 5, Together, Featherless AI, OVHcloud and DeepInfra are live for it on its Hugging Face page. 30 + 25 + 0 + 15 + 10 + 5 = 85.
Documentation and upkeep Kimi K3.1 Pro +17
Kimi K3.1 Pro 51
Model card 11, no limitations, languages or cut-off. Training data 5, one general sentence. Last change 20, a commit on 5 November 2026. Responsiveness 0, none of the 8 newest discussions has a reply from Moonshot. Version policy 5, Kimi K3 keeps its repository and no dated note was found. File health 10, the files agree. 11 + 5 + 20 + 0 + 5 + 10 = 51.
Qwen3.5-9B 34
Model card 14, it covers intended use, architecture, parameters, context and 201 languages but gives no limitations and no knowledge cut-off. Training data 5, a general line about trillions of multimodal tokens with no cut-off. Last change 5, the files and card last changed on 2 March 2026 (c202236), 247 days before 4 November, within a year. Responsiveness 0, no Qwen member replied in any of the 40 most recent of the 45 discussions that aren't pull requests (2 March to 29 September 2026). Version policy 5, a first release that was never replaced in place, with no dated notes across generations. File health 5, two reports about the files and card (15 and 51) are still open with no reply. 14 + 5 + 5 + 0 + 5 + 5 = 34. The card's highlights mention sparse Mixture-of-Experts for the series while this 9B is dense, but its own overview matches config.json, so it's not counted as a contradiction.
Risk Qwen3.5-9B +5
Kimi K3.1 Pro 50
File safety 15, safetensors only, less 10 for remote code and prompts built by the repository's script. Provenance 15, Moonshot's own organisation with a hash on every file. Safety evaluation 10, Moonshot's own cyber benchmark results and nobody else's yet. Agent guidance 0, none on the card. Licence risk 10, the revenue threshold. Security programme 0, no way to report a flaw found. 15 + 15 + 10 + 0 + 10 + 0 = 50.
Qwen3.5-9B 55
File safety 25, safetensors only and nothing from the repository runs on load or to build prompts. Provenance 15, the Qwen organisation linked from Alibaba's QwenLM README, with a SHA-256 for every shard. Safety evaluation 0, none on the card, and the Qwen3.5 blog couldn't be read, so this is couldn't check scored as absent. Agent guidance 0, the card has no prompt-injection guidance, refusal scope or cautions. Licence risk 15, Apache 2.0 with nothing added and a working licence link. Security programme 0, no SECURITY.md in Qwen's GitHub repositories, no security.txt on qwen.ai or alibabacloud.com, and whether Alibaba's group security centre takes reports about Qwen models couldn't be checked.
Agent interface Qwen3.5-9B +5
Kimi K3.1 Pro 65
Chat template 10, the format is only code to run. Tool-calling format 10, the parser is named in the runtimes' recipes and the card doesn't say how tools are declared. Trained tool calling 20, several calls a turn on Kimi K3's tools channel. Structured output 5, named among linked guides without the how. Reasoning control 10, reasoning_effort per request. Context 10, 1M tokens. 10 + 10 + 20 + 5 + 10 + 10 = 65.
Qwen3.5-9B 70
Chat template 20, a Jinja file in the repository. Tool-calling format 10, the card names the qwen3_coder parser for vLLM and SGLang but leaves the declaration and return format to the template, and Qwen's own function-calling guide still describes Qwen3's Hermes format. Trained tool calling 20, the template renders several calls in one turn. Structured output 0, nothing documents asking the weights for JSON. Reasoning control 10, thinking turns off per request with enable_thinking false and the reasoning comes back in think tags that the qwen3 parser splits out. Context 10, 262,144 tokens native.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Kimi K3.1 Pro | Qwen3.5-9B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 40 | 85 | Qwen3.5-9B +45 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 50 | 55 | Qwen3.5-9B +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 65 | 70 | Qwen3.5-9B +5 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 51 | 34 | Kimi K3.1 Pro +17 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | D 48.6/100 | C 60.5/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Kimi K3.1 Pro | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Moonshot AI | Alibaba (Qwen team) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Kimi K3.1 Pro License (modified MIT) | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-11-05 | 2026-03-02 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Agent reviews | none | 2.5/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Kimi K3.1 Pro
Moonshot's newest flagship, eight days old when read, for operators with a rack. Only llama.cpp has its model code in a release, with vLLM and SGLang support still on a release candidate and a branch. The licence is permissive below a revenue threshold, and Moonshot hasn't answered a discussion on the repository yet.
Qwen3.5-9B
A small dense vision-language model with trained tool calling, thinking that turns off per request and a 262,144-token context. Ollama's 4-bit build is 6.6 GB and the BF16 files 19.3 GB, and every major runtime loads it. The files haven't changed since 2 March 2026, Qwen answered none of the 40 latest discussions, and no safety results are published.
Before you call either
Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Use Moonshot's API or Together unless you have a node of eight B300-class accelerators
- With vLLM use 0.34.0 or later and the recipe's flags,
--tool-call-parser kimi_k3 --reasoning-parser kimi_k3 - Pass the whole assistant message back in later turns, reasoning_content and tool_calls included, as the card requires
- Set
reasoning_effortto low, high or max per request. Max is the default and thinking can't be turned off - Kimi K3's model code doesn't load it, because the attention layers changed
- Validate JSON output yourself, since the card doesn't document structured output for the weights
Qwen3.5-9B
- Smallest start is
ollama run qwen3.5:9b(6.6 GB, q4_k_m) - On vLLM run
vllm serve Qwen/Qwen3.5-9B --port 8000 --max-model-len 262144 --reasoning-parser qwen3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder, or tool calls come back as text - Tool calls use the XML style
<tool_call><function=name><parameter=x>, not Hermes JSON, so use the qwen3_coder parser and not hermes - Thinking is on by default; pass
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse for short tasks, since/nothinkisn't supported - There's no generation_config.json, so pass sampling yourself, temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95, top_k 20, presence_penalty 1.5 when thinking, or 0.7, 0.8, 20, 1.5 without
- Keep at least 128K of context when thinking, and turn on YaRN only beyond 262,144 tokens
- Validate JSON output yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Kimi K3.1 Pro or Qwen3.5-9B?
Qwen3.5-9B scores 60.5 (C) on agent readiness against Kimi K3.1 Pro's 48.6 (D), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. Kimi K3.1 Pro leads on documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with Kimi K3.1 Pro or Qwen3.5-9B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Agents-A1-4B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Arete-27B vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Arete-27B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- BigBang-v1 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- BigBang-v1 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Carbon-X vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Carbon-X vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Qwen3.5-9B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.5-9B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3.5-9B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Qwen3.5-9B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.5-9B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3.5-9B
- GLM-5.3 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3.5-9B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Hy3 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Hy3 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Inkling-Small vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Inkling vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Inkling vs Qwen3.5-9B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Kolibri-1
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Kronos
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Laguna M.1
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Laguna S 2.1
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs LBS-27B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs LFM3-1.7B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Mistral Large 4
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs occamy-1.0
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Recursive Flint
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs SmolLM3-3B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Kimi K3 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Kronos vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3.5-9B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-9B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/kimi-k3-1-pro-vs-qwen3-5-9b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/kimi-k3-1-pro.json·/api/v1/tools/qwen3-5-9b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare kimi-k3-1-pro qwen3-5-9b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "kimi-k3-1-pro", "b": "qwen3-5-9b"}at/mcp, no key