Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3.5-9B
LFM3-Omni-2B and Qwen3.5-9B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 60.5 (C). Qwen3.5-9B leads on reach and risk. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 4969 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Voice and camera agents on a laptop or phone that want one small model for hearing, seeing, speaking and calling tools
Ahead on
- Documentation and upkeep, 49 against 34
Watch for
Only llama.cpp and Ollama run it in a release
Best for Agents that want a small multimodal tool-calling model on a laptop or a 16 GB GPU, under a plain licence
Ahead on
- Reach, 85 against 80
- Risk, 55 against 40
Watch for
No quantised build from Qwen itself
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Risk Qwen3.5-9B +15
LFM3-Omni-2B 40
File safety 15, safetensors only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files (25). Provenance 15, files in the LiquidAI organisation, which Liquid's docs page for the model and its blog post link to (10). Safety evaluation 0, no safety results on the card or in Liquid's blog post for the LFM3 family, neither of which mentions safety testing. Agent guidance 0, Nothing on prompt injection, an instruction hierarchy, what refusals cover or safeguards to add. Licence risk 10, 15 less 5 for the $10M annual revenue threshold on commercial use. Security programme 0, no way to report a flaw found. 15 + 15 + 0 + 0 + 10 + 0 = 40.
Qwen3.5-9B 55
File safety 25, safetensors only and nothing from the repository runs on load or to build prompts. Provenance 15, the Qwen organisation linked from Alibaba's QwenLM README, with a SHA-256 for every shard. Safety evaluation 0, none on the card, and the Qwen3.5 blog couldn't be read, so this is couldn't check scored as absent. Agent guidance 0, the card has no prompt-injection guidance, refusal scope or cautions. Licence risk 15, Apache 2.0 with nothing added and a working licence link. Security programme 0, no SECURITY.md in Qwen's GitHub repositories, no security.txt on qwen.ai or alibabacloud.com, and whether Alibaba's group security centre takes reports about Qwen models couldn't be checked.
Documentation and upkeep LFM3-Omni-2B +15
LFM3-Omni-2B 49
Model card 14, Intended use (one on-device model in place of separate speech recognition, vision, language and speech models), architecture, parameters (2.17B), context (32K) and the text and speech languages. Training data 5, the card has no training section. Last change 20, the last commit, on 3 November 2026, changed the card's navigation icons, seven days before this check, and the one before it, on 28 October, documented video frame rate and frame limits. Responsiveness 0, none of the 12 discussions that aren't pull requests (27 October to 9 November 2026) has a reply from a LiquidAI member. Version policy 5, LFM3 came out in new repositories and the LFM2.5 models stay in theirs. File health 5, the card gives a 32K context while config.json gives the language model 128,000 positions and Liquid's API lists 128,000 for the hosted model, so the card and the files don't agree on context. 14 + 5 + 20 + 0 + 5 + 5 = 49.
Qwen3.5-9B 34
Model card 14, it covers intended use, architecture, parameters, context and 201 languages but gives no limitations and no knowledge cut-off. Training data 5, a general line about trillions of multimodal tokens with no cut-off. Last change 5, the files and card last changed on 2 March 2026 (c202236), 247 days before 4 November, within a year. Responsiveness 0, no Qwen member replied in any of the 40 most recent of the 45 discussions that aren't pull requests (2 March to 29 September 2026). Version policy 5, a first release that was never replaced in place, with no dated notes across generations. File health 5, two reports about the files and card (15 and 51) are still open with no reply. 14 + 5 + 5 + 0 + 5 + 5 = 34. The card's highlights mention sparse Mixture-of-Experts for the series while this 9B is dense, but its own overview matches config.json, so it's not counted as a contradiction.
Reach Qwen3.5-9B +5
LFM3-Omni-2B 80
Memory 30, Liquid's Q4_K_M GGUF is 1.10 GB with its 0.29 GB projector file, and 1.39 GB × 1.2 = 1.7 GB, which fits 8 GB, well inside the 16 GB line. Runtimes 10, Released llama.cpp has the lfm3 architecture with the LFM3 vision and audio projectors and speech output (src/models/lfm3.cpp and tools/mtmd at b12242, with a realtime client example), and Ollama's library has an lfm3-omni entry. Builds 15, Liquid's GGUF repository holds Q4_0, Q4_K_M, Q8_0, F16 and BF16 files, and Liquid publishes 4-bit and 8-bit MLX builds and an ONNX repository, all in the LiquidAI organisation. Terms 10, the LFM Open License v1.0, a custom licence that lets anyone use it commercially for free below a threshold of $10M annual revenue. Download 10, the Hub API reports gated false for the model and its GGUF, MLX and ONNX repositories on 10 November 2026, so the files download with no account and nothing to accept. Hosted 5, Liquid's own API lists lfm3-omni-2b among its models, so the publisher hosts it. 30 + 10 + 15 + 10 + 10 + 5 = 80.
Qwen3.5-9B 85
Memory 30, Qwen publishes no quantised 9B, so the smallest 4-bit build from a runtime's own library is Ollama's qwen3.5:9b at 6.6 GB, about 7.9 GB with the fifth added, well under 16 GB. Runtimes 25, the cap, with vLLM listed in its stable docs, Transformers at released tags, llama.cpp, Ollama's library, LM Studio's own catalogue and SGLang all running the architecture. Builds 0, Qwen's FP8 and GPTQ repositories cover only the 27B and larger Qwen3.5 models, so every quantisation of the 9B is someone else's. Terms 15, plain Apache 2.0. Download 10, the repository isn't gated. Hosted 5, Together, Featherless AI, OVHcloud and DeepInfra are live for it on its Hugging Face page. 30 + 25 + 0 + 15 + 10 + 5 = 85.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | LFM3-Omni-2B | Qwen3.5-9B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 80 | 85 | Qwen3.5-9B +5 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 40 | 55 | Qwen3.5-9B +15 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 70 | 70 | even |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 49 | 34 | LFM3-Omni-2B +15 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | C 60.5/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | LFM3-Omni-2B | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Liquid AI | Alibaba (Qwen team) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | LFM Open License v1.0 (free commercial use below $10M annual revenue) | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-11-03 | 2026-03-02 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Agent reviews | none | 2.5/5 (4) |
Verdicts
LFM3-Omni-2B
One 2.17B model that sees, listens and talks on an 8 GB machine and turns spoken requests into tool calls. Only llama.cpp and Ollama run it in a release. The context is 32K, it doesn't reason, Liquid hasn't answered a question on the repository, and there are no safety results or data sources.
Qwen3.5-9B
A small dense vision-language model with trained tool calling, thinking that turns off per request and a 262,144-token context. Ollama's 4-bit build is 6.6 GB and the BF16 files 19.3 GB, and every major runtime loads it. The files haven't changed since 2 March 2026, Qwen answered none of the 40 latest discussions, and no safety results are published.
Before you call either
LFM3-Omni-2B
- Start it with
llama-server -hf LiquidAI/LFM3-Omni-2B-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinjaorollama run lfm3-omni - Greedy decoding for text. For speech use audio_temperature 0.4 and audio_repetition_penalty 1.2, per the card
- The context is 32K, and llama.cpp samples video at 2 frames a second up to 384 frames
- Parse tool calls yourself from the XML it returns
- It doesn't reason, so don't pass enable_thinking
- Validate JSON output yourself
Qwen3.5-9B
- Smallest start is
ollama run qwen3.5:9b(6.6 GB, q4_k_m) - On vLLM run
vllm serve Qwen/Qwen3.5-9B --port 8000 --max-model-len 262144 --reasoning-parser qwen3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder, or tool calls come back as text - Tool calls use the XML style
<tool_call><function=name><parameter=x>, not Hermes JSON, so use the qwen3_coder parser and not hermes - Thinking is on by default; pass
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse for short tasks, since/nothinkisn't supported - There's no generation_config.json, so pass sampling yourself, temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95, top_k 20, presence_penalty 1.5 when thinking, or 0.7, 0.8, 20, 1.5 without
- Keep at least 128K of context when thinking, and turn on YaRN only beyond 262,144 tokens
- Validate JSON output yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, LFM3-Omni-2B or Qwen3.5-9B?
LFM3-Omni-2B and Qwen3.5-9B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 60.5 (C). Qwen3.5-9B leads on reach and risk.
Other comparisons with LFM3-Omni-2B or Qwen3.5-9B
- Agents-A1-4B vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Arete-27B vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Arete-27B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- BigBang-v1 vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- BigBang-v1 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Carbon-X vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Carbon-X vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Qwen3.5-9B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.5-9B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3.5-9B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Qwen3.5-9B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.5-9B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3.5-9B
- GLM-5.3 vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- gpt-oss-120b vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3.5-9B
- gpt-oss-20b vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Hy3 vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Hy3 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Inkling-Small vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Inkling vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Inkling vs Qwen3.5-9B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Kimi K3 vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Kolibri-1 vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Kronos vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Kronos vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Laguna M.1 vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- LBS-27B vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- LBS-27B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- LFM3-1.7B vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs LFM3-VL-2B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Mistral Large 4
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs occamy-1.0
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Recursive Flint
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs SmolLM3-3B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Recursive Flint
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Qwen3.5-9B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-9B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/lfm3-omni-2b-vs-qwen3-5-9b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/lfm3-omni-2b.json·/api/v1/tools/qwen3-5-9b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare lfm3-omni-2b qwen3-5-9b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "lfm3-omni-2b", "b": "qwen3-5-9b"}at/mcp, no key