Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Inkling-Small vs Ling-3.0-tiny
Inkling-Small scores 66.5 (B) on agent readiness against Ling-3.0-tiny's 55 (C), and leads in 4 of 5 scored categories. Ling-3.0-tiny leads on reach. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Teams with 256 GB or more of datacentre GPU memory who want an open multimodal agent model with audio input and adjustable thinking.
Ahead on
- Capability, 63 against 31
- Risk, 70 against 50
- Agent interface, 85 against 60
- Documentation and upkeep, 82 against 56
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.5 against 2.8 out of 5
Watch for
The smallest build Thinking Machines publishes needs about 205 GB
Best for Agents on a laptop or small GPU that want a fast local model for tool calls and short reasoning, under MIT
Ahead on
- Reach, 90 against 55
Watch for
No hosted provider today, and Ollama support is only an unmerged pull request
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Inkling-Small | Ling-3.0-tiny | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%35 | 63 | 31 | Inkling-Small +32 |
| Reach | 25%25 | 55 | 90 | Ling-3.0-tiny +35 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 70 | 50 | Inkling-Small +20 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 60 | Inkling-Small +25 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 82 | 56 | Inkling-Small +26 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | B 66.5/100 | C 55/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Inkling-Small | Ling-3.0-tiny |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Thinking Machines Lab | inclusionAI (Ant Group) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-07-31 | 2026-08-31 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (4) | 2.8/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Inkling-Small
A mixture-of-experts generalist with images and audio in, several tool calls a turn and per-request thinking effort. It needs about 205 GB for Thinking Machines' NVFP4 build on recent NVIDIA or AMD datacentre GPUs, and Tinker or DeepInfra host it. The main risks are a use policy that binds on download and can change, and no outside safety results.
Ling-3.0-tiny
A small, quick hybrid reasoning cousin for local agent work, tool calls and coding, under MIT. It runs in about 6 GB from inclusionAI's 4-bit GGUF in released Transformers, vLLM, SGLang and llama.cpp, with no host. The main risks are a card that doesn't match the files in places, the vLLM route running repository code, and no model safety results.
Before you call either
Inkling-Small
- Start the NVFP4 build with SGLang's recipe,
sglang serve --trust-remote-code --model-path thinkingmachines/Inkling-Small-NVFP4 --tp 8 --enable-multimodal --reasoning-parser inkling --tool-call-parser inkling, on Blackwell for W4A4 - Use the inkling tool and reasoning parsers in vLLM or SGLang, or Thinking Machines' tml-renderers package to render prompts and parse calls yourself
- Pass
reasoning_effortas none, minimal, low, medium, high (the default) or max, or a number from 0 to 0.99. The repository's template has no xhigh preset and raises an error for it, though Thinking Machines' docs and SGLang's cookbook list xhigh - Effort none conditions the model toward no reasoning but doesn't forbid it, and higher effort needs a larger max_tokens
- Tool call arguments must reach the template as an object, not a JSON string, or it raises an error
- Images should be 40 to 4096 px a side and audio 16 kHz WAV under two minutes, per the card
- Use guided decoding or validate JSON yourself, since structured output isn't documented
- Read the Model Acceptable Use Policy before deploying, it binds on download and bars some uses that are legal
Ling-3.0-tiny
- Start it with
llama-server -hf inclusionAI/Ling-3.0-tiny-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinja -c 32768, which needs llama.cpp b11772 or a recent release with bailingmoe3 - With vLLM 0.32.0,
vllm serve inclusionAI/Ling-3.0-tiny --trust-remote-code --enable-prefix-caching --mamba-cache-mode align --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser ling3 --reasoning-parser ling3, which runs the repository's config code - With SGLang 0.5.22, its cookbook uses
--reasoning-parser deepseek-r1 --tool-call-parser glm45for this model, and drop the card's NEXTN flags since tiny has no MTP layer - Thinking is on by default, pass
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse for short tasks - Sampling per the card is temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and top_k 20
- The template keeps earlier reasoning in the prompt, which grows long agent sessions
- Validate JSON output yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since structured output isn't documented
- For a guardrail, inclusionAI's Ling-3.0-tiny-singprobe scores intent, unsafe output and hallucination per token, but only through SGLang and vLLM integration branches
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Inkling-Small or Ling-3.0-tiny?
Inkling-Small scores 66.5 (B) on agent readiness against Ling-3.0-tiny's 55 (C), and leads in 4 of 5 scored categories. Ling-3.0-tiny leads on reach.
Other comparisons with Inkling-Small or Ling-3.0-tiny
- Agents-A1-4B vs Inkling-Small
- Agents-A1-4B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Inkling-Small
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Inkling-Small
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- BigBang-v1 vs Inkling-Small
- BigBang-v1 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Inkling-Small
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Inkling-Small
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Inkling-Small
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Inkling-Small
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Inkling-Small
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Inkling-Small
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Inkling-Small
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Inkling-Small
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Inkling-Small
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Inkling-Small
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Inkling-Small
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Inkling-Small
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Inkling-Small
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Inkling-Small
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- GLM-5.3 vs Inkling-Small
- GLM-5.3 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- gpt-oss-120b vs Inkling-Small
- gpt-oss-120b vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- gpt-oss-20b vs Inkling-Small
- gpt-oss-20b vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Inkling-Small
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Hy3 vs Inkling-Small
- Hy3 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Inkling-Small vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- Inkling-Small vs Kimi K3
- Inkling-Small vs Kolibri-1
- Inkling-Small vs Laguna M.1
- Inkling-Small vs Laguna S 2.1
- Inkling-Small vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Inkling-Small vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Inkling-Small vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Inkling-Small vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Inkling-Small vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Inkling-Small vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Inkling-Small vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Inkling-Small vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Inkling-Small vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Inkling-Small vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Inkling-Small vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Inkling-Small vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Inkling-Small vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Inkling-Small vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Inkling-Small vs occamy-1.0
- Inkling-Small vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Inkling-Small vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Inkling-Small vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Inkling-Small vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Inkling-Small vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Inkling-Small vs SmolLM3-3B
- Inkling-Small vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Inkling-Small vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Inkling-Small vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Inkling-Small vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Inkling vs Inkling-Small
- Inkling vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Kimi K3 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Kolibri-1 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Laguna M.1 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs occamy-1.0
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/inkling-small-vs-ling-3-0-tiny.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/inkling-small.json·/api/v1/tools/ling-3-0-tiny.json - From a terminal
anchor compare inkling-small ling-3-0-tiny(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "inkling-small", "b": "ling-3-0-tiny"}at/mcp, no key