Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Inkling-Small vs LFM2.5-2.6B
Inkling-Small scores 66.5 (B) on agent readiness against LFM2.5-2.6B's 51.5 (D), and leads in 4 of 5 scored categories. LFM2.5-2.6B leads on reach. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Teams with 256 GB or more of datacentre GPU memory who want an open multimodal agent model with audio input and adjustable thinking.
Ahead on
- Capability, 63 against 13
- Risk, 70 against 50
- Agent interface, 85 against 75
- Documentation and upkeep, 82 against 57
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.5 against 2.5 out of 5
Watch for
The smallest build Thinking Machines publishes needs about 205 GB
Best for Agents that want a small local helper for tool calls, extraction and RAG on a laptop, phone or CPU, at organisations under the licence's revenue threshold
Ahead on
- Reach, 95 against 55
Watch for
Commercial use isn't licensed for organisations with $10M or more of annual revenue
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Inkling-Small | LFM2.5-2.6B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%35 | 63 | 13 | Inkling-Small +50 |
| Reach | 25%25 | 55 | 95 | LFM2.5-2.6B +40 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 70 | 50 | Inkling-Small +20 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 75 | Inkling-Small +10 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 82 | 57 | Inkling-Small +25 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | B 66.5/100 | D 51.5/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Inkling-Small | LFM2.5-2.6B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Thinking Machines Lab | Liquid AI |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | LFM Open License v1.0 (free commercial use below $10M annual revenue) |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | 2026-07-31 | 2026-09-22 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (4) | 2.5/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Inkling-Small
A mixture-of-experts generalist with images and audio in, several tool calls a turn and per-request thinking effort. It needs about 205 GB for Thinking Machines' NVFP4 build on recent NVIDIA or AMD datacentre GPUs, and Tinker or DeepInfra host it. The main risks are a use policy that binds on download and can change, and no outside safety results.
LFM2.5-2.6B
A small, fast cousin for tool calls, extraction and long-context steps on a laptop or phone. Liquid's own 4-bit build is 1.6 GB, and every common runtime runs it. It always thinks, isn't meant for coding or knowledge-heavy work, and organisations over $10M of revenue need another licence. There are no safety results or security contact.
Before you call either
Inkling-Small
- Start the NVFP4 build with SGLang's recipe,
sglang serve --trust-remote-code --model-path thinkingmachines/Inkling-Small-NVFP4 --tp 8 --enable-multimodal --reasoning-parser inkling --tool-call-parser inkling, on Blackwell for W4A4 - Use the inkling tool and reasoning parsers in vLLM or SGLang, or Thinking Machines' tml-renderers package to render prompts and parse calls yourself
- Pass
reasoning_effortas none, minimal, low, medium, high (the default) or max, or a number from 0 to 0.99. The repository's template has no xhigh preset and raises an error for it, though Thinking Machines' docs and SGLang's cookbook list xhigh - Effort none conditions the model toward no reasoning but doesn't forbid it, and higher effort needs a larger max_tokens
- Tool call arguments must reach the template as an object, not a JSON string, or it raises an error
- Images should be 40 to 4096 px a side and audio 16 kHz WAV under two minutes, per the card
- Use guided decoding or validate JSON yourself, since structured output isn't documented
- Read the Model Acceptable Use Policy before deploying, it binds on download and bars some uses that are legal
LFM2.5-2.6B
- Quickest start is
ollama run LiquidAI/lfm2.5-2.6b, 1.7 GB, orllama-cli -hf LiquidAI/LFM2.5-2.6B-GGUF - With vLLM or SGLang pass
--tool-call-parser lfm2; for vLLM add--reasoning-parser qwen3so the thinking comes back separately - Sample at temperature 0.1, top_k 50 and repetition_penalty 1.1, as the card and generation_config.json set
- Put tools in the system prompt as
List of tools: [...]JSON, or pass tools to apply_chat_template; calls come back as a Python list of function calls, and the system prompt can ask for JSON calls instead - Leave max_tokens unset or generous, since a low cap cuts the reasoning off mid-thought
- Earlier thinking is dropped from the prompt unless
preserve_thinkingis true - Liquid's 328M LFM2.5-2.6B-DSpark drafter speeds decoding about 2.6 times in SGLang and on Apple silicon, per Liquid
- Validate JSON output yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since structured output isn't documented
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Inkling-Small or LFM2.5-2.6B?
Inkling-Small scores 66.5 (B) on agent readiness against LFM2.5-2.6B's 51.5 (D), and leads in 4 of 5 scored categories. LFM2.5-2.6B leads on reach.
Other comparisons with Inkling-Small or LFM2.5-2.6B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Inkling-Small
- Agents-A1-4B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Inkling-Small
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Inkling-Small
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- BigBang-v1 vs Inkling-Small
- BigBang-v1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Inkling-Small
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Inkling-Small
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Inkling-Small
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Inkling-Small
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Inkling-Small
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Inkling-Small
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Inkling-Small
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Inkling-Small
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Inkling-Small
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Inkling-Small
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Inkling-Small
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Inkling-Small
- GLM-4.5-Air vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Inkling-Small
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Inkling-Small
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-5.3 vs Inkling-Small
- GLM-5.3 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Inkling-Small
- gpt-oss-120b vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Inkling-Small
- gpt-oss-20b vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Inkling-Small
- Granite 4.2 3B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Hy3 vs Inkling-Small
- Hy3 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Inkling-Small vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- Inkling-Small vs Kimi K3
- Inkling-Small vs Kolibri-1
- Inkling-Small vs Laguna M.1
- Inkling-Small vs Laguna S 2.1
- Inkling-Small vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Inkling-Small vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Inkling-Small vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Inkling-Small vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Inkling-Small vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Inkling-Small vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Inkling-Small vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Inkling-Small vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Inkling-Small vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Inkling-Small vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Inkling-Small vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Inkling-Small vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Inkling-Small vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Inkling-Small vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Inkling-Small vs occamy-1.0
- Inkling-Small vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Inkling-Small vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Inkling-Small vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Inkling-Small vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Inkling-Small vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Inkling-Small vs SmolLM3-3B
- Inkling-Small vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Inkling-Small vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Inkling-Small vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Inkling-Small vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Inkling vs Inkling-Small
- Inkling vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Kimi K3 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Kolibri-1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Laguna M.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs occamy-1.0
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs SmolLM3-3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/inkling-small-vs-lfm2-5-2-6b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/inkling-small.json·/api/v1/tools/lfm2-5-2-6b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare inkling-small lfm2-5-2-6b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "inkling-small", "b": "lfm2-5-2-6b"}at/mcp, no key