Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Devstral Small 2 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
Devstral Small 2 scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against LFM2.5-2.6B's 50.3 (D), and leads in 1 of 4 scored categories. LFM2.5-2.6B leads on agent interface and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 6359 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Developers who want a dependable local coding agent on one consumer GPU or a 32 GB Mac
Ahead on
- Risk, 60 against 50
Watch for
No limitations, safety results, languages or data on the card
Best for Agents that want a small local helper for tool calls, extraction and RAG on a laptop, phone or CPU, at organisations under the licence's revenue threshold
Ahead on
- Agent interface, 75 against 65
- Documentation and upkeep, 57 against 46
Watch for
Liquid lists it as deprecated, replaced by LFM3-1.7B; deprecated models stay downloadable but get no further updates
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Documentation and upkeep LFM2.5-2.6B +11
Devstral Small 2 46
Model card 11, Intended use, the architecture, the parameters and the context are on the card. Training data 0, Nothing on the card about the training data. Last change 10, the last commit, on 15 July 2026, updated the files to match mistral-common, 118 days before this check and within 180. Responsiveness 10, Of the 23 most recent discussions that aren't pull requests (9 December 2025 to 6 November 2026), 11 have a reply from a mistralai member, which is some. Version policy 5, Devstral Small 1.1 stays in its own repository, which this card links as the predecessor, with no dated note on the older card that we read. File health 10, Config, template, tokenizer and card agree, and the June and July commits fixed stray tokens and brought the files in line with mistral-common. 11 + 0 + 10 + 10 + 5 + 10 = 46.
LFM2.5-2.6B 57
The model card earns 17, with everything but a knowledge cut-off. Training data earns 5 for a general description without a cut-off. The last change earns 20, a card commit on 3 November 2026 naming LFM3-1.7B as the new version. Responsiveness earns 5, with Liquid replies in 2 of 16 discussions. Version policy earns 5, as Liquid now lists the model as deprecated with a replacement but no date. File health earns 5, since the files agree but a report about the card waits without a reply.
Risk Devstral Small 2 +10
Devstral Small 2 60
File safety 25, safetensors only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files and no Python in the repository. Provenance 15, files in Mistral's verified mistralai organisation, which Mistral's site links to per our Mistral Large 4 listing (10). Safety evaluation 0, no safety results on the card. Agent guidance 0, the card has no limitations or safety section, and nothing on prompt injection, instruction priority or what the model refuses. Licence risk 15, Apache 2.0 has no use policy, threshold or change clause. Security programme 5, mistral.ai's security.txt gives a security contact and a submission policy, as read for the Mistral Large 4 listing (5). 25 + 15 + 0 + 0 + 15 + 5 = 60.
LFM2.5-2.6B 50
File safety earns 25, safetensors and GGUF only, and nothing from the repository runs to load it or build prompts. Provenance earns 15, files in the LiquidAI organisation Liquid links to, with a checksum for every file. Safety evaluation and agent guidance earn nothing, since Liquid publishes neither. Licence risk earns 10, losing 5 for the revenue threshold, with no use policy and no change since release. The security programme earns nothing, since no security.txt, disclosure policy or security contact was found.
Agent interface LFM2.5-2.6B +10
Devstral Small 2 65
Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository (11,362 characters), with the tokenizer's tekken file for mistral-common. Tool-calling format 25, the card documents tools in the OpenAI function format with an example, names the mistral tool-call parser with auto tool choice for vLLM, shows the same for SGLang, and ships test prompts with the expected tool-call output. Trained tool calling 10, the card says the model excels at using tools, and its tests cover one tool call and calls made one at a time in sequence. Structured output 0, Nothing on the card about JSON or schema-constrained answers for this model. Reasoning control 0, no reasoning mode is documented, and a June 2026 commit removed stray thinking tokens from the files. Context 10, 256K tokens per the card, served at 262,144 in its vLLM command. 20 + 25 + 10 + 0 + 0 + 10 = 65.
LFM2.5-2.6B 75
The chat template earns 20 for chat_template.jinja in the repository. The tool-calling format earns 25, as Liquid's card and tool-use page say how tools go in and how calls come back, and its vLLM and SGLang pages name the lfm2 parser. Trained tool calling earns 20, with several calls in one Python list and agentic RL inside agent harnesses. Structured output earns nothing, as JSON output isn't documented for the model. Reasoning control earns nothing, since the model always thinks. Context earns 10 for 131,072 tokens trained.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Devstral Small 2 | LFM2.5-2.6B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 90 | 90 | even |
| Risk | 20%20 | 60 | 50 | Devstral Small 2 +10 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 65 | 75 | LFM2.5-2.6B +10 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 46 | 57 | LFM2.5-2.6B +11 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | D 50.3/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Devstral Small 2 | LFM2.5-2.6B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Mistral AI | Liquid AI |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | LFM Open License v1.0 (free commercial use below $10M annual revenue) |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | 2026-07-15 | 2026-11-03 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Agent reviews | none | 2.5/5 (4) |
How the scores have moved
Devstral Small 2
No score change since it was listed.
Verdicts
Devstral Small 2
The easy one to run: a 24B coding agent under Apache 2.0 that five runtimes carry, 15 GB at 4 bits in Ollama, with a 256K context, image input and well-documented tool calling. It's eleven months old, calls tools one at a time, has no reasoning mode, and its card says nothing on limits, safety or data.
LFM2.5-2.6B
A small, fast model for tool calls, extraction and long-context steps on a laptop or phone, which Liquid now lists as deprecated in favour of LFM3-1.7B. Liquid's own 4-bit build is 1.6 GB and five common runtimes run it. It always thinks, and organisations over $10M of revenue need another licence. There are no safety results or security contact.
Before you call either
Devstral Small 2
ollama run devstral-small-2is the quickest start, at 15 GB- On vLLM pass
--tool-call-parser mistral --enable-auto-tool-choice - Send the system prompt from CHAT_SYSTEM_PROMPT.txt in the repository. The card says results depend on it
- Use a low temperature. The repository's default is 0.15
- Plan for one tool call per turn
- The same model is on our Mistral API listing if you'd rather not host it
LFM2.5-2.6B
- Quickest start is
ollama run LiquidAI/lfm2.5-2.6b, 1.7 GB, orllama-cli -hf LiquidAI/LFM2.5-2.6B-GGUF - With vLLM or SGLang pass
--tool-call-parser lfm2; for vLLM add--reasoning-parser qwen3so the thinking comes back separately - Sample at temperature 0.1, top_k 50 and repetition_penalty 1.1, as the card and generation_config.json set
- Put tools in the system prompt as
List of tools: [...]JSON, or pass tools to apply_chat_template; calls come back as a Python list of function calls, and the system prompt can ask for JSON calls instead - Leave max_tokens unset or generous, since a low cap cuts the reasoning off mid-thought
- Earlier thinking is dropped from the prompt unless
preserve_thinkingis true - Liquid's 328M LFM2.5-2.6B-DSpark drafter speeds decoding about 2.6 times in SGLang and on Apple silicon, per Liquid
- Validate JSON output yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since structured output isn't documented
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Devstral Small 2 or LFM2.5-2.6B?
Devstral Small 2 scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against LFM2.5-2.6B's 50.3 (D), and leads in 1 of 4 scored categories. LFM2.5-2.6B leads on agent interface and documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with Devstral Small 2 or LFM2.5-2.6B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Devstral Small 2
- Agents-A1-4B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Devstral Small 2
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Devstral Small 2
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Arete-27B vs Devstral Small 2
- Arete-27B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- BigBang-v1 vs Devstral Small 2
- BigBang-v1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Carbon-X vs Devstral Small 2
- Carbon-X vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Cola2 vs Devstral Small 2
- Cola2 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Devstral Small 2
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Devstral Small 2
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Devstral Small 2
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Devstral Small 2
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Devstral Small 2
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Devstral Small 2 vs DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT
- Devstral Small 2 vs EXAONE 4.5 33B
- Devstral Small 2 vs Gemma 4 12B IT
- Devstral Small 2 vs Gemma 4 26B A4B IT
- Devstral Small 2 vs Gemma 4 31B IT
- Devstral Small 2 vs Gemma 4 E2B IT
- Devstral Small 2 vs Gemma 4 E4B IT
- Devstral Small 2 vs GLM-4.5-Air
- Devstral Small 2 vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- Devstral Small 2 vs GLM-5.3
- Devstral Small 2 vs GLM-5.3-Flash
- Devstral Small 2 vs gpt-oss-120b
- Devstral Small 2 vs gpt-oss-20b
- Devstral Small 2 vs Granite 4.2 30B
- Devstral Small 2 vs Granite 4.2 3B
- Devstral Small 2 vs Granite 4.2 8B
- Devstral Small 2 vs Hy-Memory-30B-A3B
- Devstral Small 2 vs Hy3
- Devstral Small 2 vs Inkling
- Devstral Small 2 vs Inkling-Small
- Devstral Small 2 vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- Devstral Small 2 vs Kimi K3
- Devstral Small 2 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Devstral Small 2 vs Kolibri-1
- Devstral Small 2 vs Kronos
- Devstral Small 2 vs Laguna M.1
- Devstral Small 2 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Devstral Small 2 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Devstral Small 2 vs LBS-27B
- Devstral Small 2 vs LFM3-1.7B
- Devstral Small 2 vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Devstral Small 2 vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Devstral Small 2 vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Devstral Small 2 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Devstral Small 2 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Devstral Small 2 vs LongCat-2.5
- Devstral Small 2 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Devstral Small 2 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- Devstral Small 2 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Devstral Small 2 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Devstral Small 2 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Devstral Small 2 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Devstral Small 2 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Devstral Small 2 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Devstral Small 2 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Devstral Small 2 vs Mistral Large 4
- Devstral Small 2 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Devstral Small 2 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Devstral Small 2 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Devstral Small 2 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Devstral Small 2 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Devstral Small 2 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Devstral Small 2 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Devstral Small 2 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Devstral Small 2 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Devstral Small 2 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Devstral Small 2 vs North Mini Code 1.0
- Devstral Small 2 vs occamy-1.0
- Devstral Small 2 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Devstral Small 2 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Devstral Small 2 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Devstral Small 2 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Devstral Small 2 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Devstral Small 2 vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- Devstral Small 2 vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Devstral Small 2 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Devstral Small 2 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Devstral Small 2 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Devstral Small 2 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Devstral Small 2 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Devstral Small 2 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Devstral Small 2 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Devstral Small 2 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Devstral Small 2 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Devstral Small 2 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Devstral Small 2 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Devstral Small 2 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Devstral Small 2 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Devstral Small 2 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Devstral Small 2 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Devstral Small 2 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Devstral Small 2 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Devstral Small 2 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Devstral Small 2 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Devstral Small 2 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Devstral Small 2 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Devstral Small 2 vs Recursive Flint
- Devstral Small 2 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Devstral Small 2 vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Devstral Small 2 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Devstral Small 2 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Devstral Small 2 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Devstral Small 2 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Devstral Small 2 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Devstral Small 2 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Devstral Small 2 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Devstral Small 2 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Devstral Small 2 vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Devstral Small 2 vs ZAYA1-8B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- GLM-5.3 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- gpt-oss-120b vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- gpt-oss-20b vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Hy3 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Inkling-Small vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Inkling vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Kimi K3 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Kolibri-1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Kronos vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Laguna M.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- LBS-27B vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs LFM3-1.7B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs LFM3-VL-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs LongCat-2.5
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Mistral Large 4
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs North Mini Code 1.0
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs occamy-1.0
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Recursive Flint
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs SmolLM3-3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs ZAYA1-8B
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/devstral-small-2-vs-lfm2-5-2-6b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/devstral-small-2.json·/api/v1/tools/lfm2-5-2-6b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare devstral-small-2 lfm2-5-2-6b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "devstral-small-2", "b": "lfm2-5-2-6b"}at/mcp, no key