Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
Muse Glimmer 30B scores 70 (BB) on agent readiness against Nemotron 3 Nano 4B's 56.8 (C), and leads in 4 of 5 scored categories. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Local agents and coding with image input on one 24 to 32 GB GPU or an Apple silicon laptop, where one tool call per turn is enough
Ahead on
- Capability, 50 against 25
- Risk, 80 against 65
- Agent interface, 75 against 70
- Documentation and upkeep, 65 against 55
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.8 against 3.3 out of 5
Watch for
One tool call per turn and no parallel calls
Best for Agents on laptops, edge boards and small GPUs that need a cheap local tool-calling helper in English
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
The card's Transformers and vLLM commands pass trust_remote_code and load a parser plugin from the repository
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Muse Glimmer 30B | Nemotron 3 Nano 4B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%35 | 50 | 25 | Muse Glimmer 30B +25 |
| Reach | 25%25 | 90 | 90 | even |
| Risk | 20%20 | 80 | 65 | Muse Glimmer 30B +15 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 75 | 70 | Muse Glimmer 30B +5 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 65 | 55 | Muse Glimmer 30B +10 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | BB 70/100 | C 56.8/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Muse Glimmer 30B | Nemotron 3 Nano 4B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Meta | NVIDIA |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | NVIDIA Nemotron Open Model License |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-20 | 2026-03-16 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 3.8/5 (4) | 3.3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Muse Glimmer 30B
A dense 30B multimodal cousin for local agent and coding work with images, documented tool calls and adjustable reasoning. Meta's 17 GB GGUF fits a 24 GB card and runs in llama.cpp, Ollama, vLLM, SGLang and Transformers. The main risks are one tool call per turn, no documented JSON output and a usage policy that adds limits to Apache 2.0.
Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
A tiny reasoning cousin with trained tool calls, a thinking switch and 262,144 tokens of context, running in about 4 GB from NVIDIA's own GGUF on almost any machine. The main risks are serving commands that run repository code, no published safety results, a tool format left to the template, and files untouched and questions unanswered since March.
Before you call either
Muse Glimmer 30B
- Start it with
llama serve -hf meta-models/Muse-Glimmer-30B-GGUF --hf-file Muse-Glimmer-30B-KQuant-17GB-Q4_K_M.gguf -ngl 99 -c 131072 --host 127.0.0.1 --port 8080 --chat-template-kwargs '{"reasoning_strength":"high"}'on llama.cpp b10353 or later, orollama run muse-glimmeron Ollama 0.32.7 or later - In vLLM pass
--tool-call-parser muse_glimmer --reasoning-parser muse_glimmer, in SGLangmusefor both, in ExecuTorch--tool-parser atem. Without them tool calls come back as plain text - Set reasoning per request with
chat_template_kwargs.reasoning_strength(low, medium, high or xhigh). llama.cpp and ExecuTorch don't readreasoning_effort, and ExecuTorch rejects it with a 400 - Expect one tool call per turn and return each result before the next. ExecuTorch's server rejects
tool_choice="required" - Keep temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and top_k 64, don't run greedy, and never stop on
<|eom|> - Leave max_tokens room for reasoning, since in llama.cpp a request cut off mid-thought returns empty content with finish_reason length
- For images add Meta's 1.4 GB mmproj GGUF, which takes the build to about 22 GB with the runtime's fifth
Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Quickest start is
ollama run nemotron-3-nano:4b, a 2.8 GB build - With llama.cpp use
llama-server -hf nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B-GGUF --jinja, NVIDIA's own Q4_K_M file - With vLLM, download nano_v3_reasoning_parser.py from the repository first and serve with
--enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder --reasoning-parser-plugin nano_v3_reasoning_parser.py --reasoning-parser nano_v3 - The card's Transformers snippet names nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B, use nvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B-BF16 instead
- Thinking is on by default. Pass
enable_thinking=Falseto the chat template for short tasks - Use temperature 1.0 and top_p 0.95 for reasoning and temperature 0.6 with top_p 0.95 for tool calling, as the card says
- It's tuned for English only, and validate JSON yourself, since structured output isn't documented
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Muse Glimmer 30B or Nemotron 3 Nano 4B?
Muse Glimmer 30B scores 70 (BB) on agent readiness against Nemotron 3 Nano 4B's 56.8 (C), and leads in 4 of 5 scored categories.
Other comparisons with Muse Glimmer 30B or Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- BigBang-v1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- BigBang-v1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- GLM-5.3 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- GLM-5.3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Hy3 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Hy3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Inkling-Small vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Inkling-Small vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Inkling vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Inkling vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Kimi K3 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Kimi K3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Kolibri-1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Kolibri-1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Laguna M.1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Laguna M.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs occamy-1.0
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs occamy-1.0
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/muse-glimmer-30b-vs-nemotron-3-nano-4b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/muse-glimmer-30b.json·/api/v1/tools/nemotron-3-nano-4b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare muse-glimmer-30b nemotron-3-nano-4b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "muse-glimmer-30b", "b": "nemotron-3-nano-4b"}at/mcp, no key