Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Muse Glimmer 30B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
Muse Glimmer 30B scores 70 (BB) on agent readiness against Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B's 61 (C), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B leads on agent interface. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Local agents and coding with image input on one 24 to 32 GB GPU or an Apple silicon laptop, where one tool call per turn is enough
Ahead on
- Risk, 80 against 50
- Documentation and upkeep, 65 against 31
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.8 against 2.3 out of 5
Watch for
One tool call per turn and no parallel calls
Best for Local coding and terminal agents on a 24 to 32 GB GPU or a Mac, where a clear licence file and an answering publisher aren't required
Ahead on
- Agent interface, 85 against 75
Watch for
No LICENSE file though the card links one, and no notice for the Apache 2.0 Qwen3.5 and Gemma 4 work it builds on
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Muse Glimmer 30B | Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 90 | 90 | even |
| Risk | 20%20 | 80 | 50 | Muse Glimmer 30B +30 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 75 | 85 | Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B +10 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 65 | 31 | Muse Glimmer 30B +34 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | BB 70/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Muse Glimmer 30B | Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Meta | Ornith |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-20 | 2026-08-23 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 3.8/5 (4) | 2.3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Muse Glimmer 30B
A dense 30B multimodal cousin for local agent and coding work with images, documented tool calls and adjustable reasoning. Meta's 17 GB GGUF fits a 24 GB card and runs in llama.cpp, Ollama, vLLM, SGLang and Transformers. The main risks are one tool call per turn, no documented JSON output and a usage policy that adds limits to Apache 2.0.
Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
A mid-size coding and terminal-agent cousin with about 3B active parameters, XML tool calls that vLLM and SGLang parse and 262,144 tokens of context. It runs in about 24 GB from Ornith's MLX 4-bit build or 32 GB from its GGUF. The main risk is an absent publisher, with no licence file, safety results or replies to 35 reports.
Before you call either
Muse Glimmer 30B
- Start it with
llama serve -hf meta-models/Muse-Glimmer-30B-GGUF --hf-file Muse-Glimmer-30B-KQuant-17GB-Q4_K_M.gguf -ngl 99 -c 131072 --host 127.0.0.1 --port 8080 --chat-template-kwargs '{"reasoning_strength":"high"}'on llama.cpp b10353 or later, orollama run muse-glimmeron Ollama 0.32.7 or later - In vLLM pass
--tool-call-parser muse_glimmer --reasoning-parser muse_glimmer, in SGLangmusefor both, in ExecuTorch--tool-parser atem. Without them tool calls come back as plain text - Set reasoning per request with
chat_template_kwargs.reasoning_strength(low, medium, high or xhigh). llama.cpp and ExecuTorch don't readreasoning_effort, and ExecuTorch rejects it with a 400 - Expect one tool call per turn and return each result before the next. ExecuTorch's server rejects
tool_choice="required" - Keep temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and top_k 64, don't run greedy, and never stop on
<|eom|> - Leave max_tokens room for reasoning, since in llama.cpp a request cut off mid-thought returns empty content with finish_reason length
- For images add Meta's 1.4 GB mmproj GGUF, which takes the build to about 22 GB with the runtime's fifth
Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Start it with
ollama run ornith-1.5:35b, orllama-server -hf ornith-ai/Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B-GGUF --port 8000 -c 262144as the card gives it - In vLLM pass
--enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_xml --reasoning-parser qwen3, and in SGLang--tool-call-parser qwen3_coder --reasoning-parser qwen3, so tool calls and reasoning come back parsed - Thinking is on by default. Send
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse for short tasks, a switch the card doesn't mention - Pin which template your runtime loads, since chat_template.jinja keeps earlier reasoning and the tokenizer_config.json template drops it
- Use temperature 0.6, top_p 0.95, top_k 20 for general tasks and temperature 1.0 to reproduce the card's benchmarks
- Pin a revision when you download, since Ornith has replaced files in place, and add mmproj-Ornith-1.5-35B-BF16.gguf (0.9 GB) for image input in llama.cpp
- Validate JSON output yourself, since structured output isn't documented
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Muse Glimmer 30B or Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B?
Muse Glimmer 30B scores 70 (BB) on agent readiness against Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B's 61 (C), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B leads on agent interface.
Other comparisons with Muse Glimmer 30B or Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- BigBang-v1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- BigBang-v1 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- GLM-5.3 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- GLM-5.3 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Hy3 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Hy3 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Inkling-Small vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Inkling-Small vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Inkling vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Inkling vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Kimi K3 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Kimi K3 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Kolibri-1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Kolibri-1 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Laguna M.1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Laguna M.1 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs occamy-1.0
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- occamy-1.0 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/muse-glimmer-30b-vs-ornith-1-5-35b-a3b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/muse-glimmer-30b.json·/api/v1/tools/ornith-1-5-35b-a3b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare muse-glimmer-30b ornith-1-5-35b-a3b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "muse-glimmer-30b", "b": "ornith-1-5-35b-a3b"}at/mcp, no key