Head to head · Speech-to-text · October 2026 research run

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Underdog Bark 3.0

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning scores 60.7 (C) on agent readiness against Underdog Bark 3.0's 48.2 (D), and leads in every scored category. Both do speech-to-text.

Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons

Best speech-to-text APIs for AI agents · All 231 stt comparisons

Which one, for what

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning C

Best for Agents with a 32 to 48 GB NVIDIA GPU that need one local model to read video, audio, documents and screens and call tools

Ahead on

  • Reach, 85 against 65
  • Risk, 60 against 40
  • Agent interface, 90 against 35
  • Documentation and upkeep, 65 against 49

Watch for

Loads with trust_remote_code in every documented runtime command

Underdog Bark 3.0 D

Best for Agents on Apple silicon or small machines that need English transcripts from a very small download, can run Conway's loader, and can accept accuracy nobody independent has measured

No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.

Watch for

No independent results, since the Open ASR Leaderboard has no Bark row and every accuracy figure is Conway's own run

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B ReasoningUnderdog Bark 3.0Edge
Capability35%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Reach25%258565Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning +20
Risk20%206040Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning +20
Agent interface10%109035Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning +55
Documentation and upkeep10%106549Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning +16
Negative events≤150-2
TotalC 60.7/100D 48.2/100

Facts side by side

FactNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B ReasoningUnderdog Bark 3.0
KindOpen-weight modelOpen-weight model
VendorNVIDIAConway Research
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
Transports
AuthNoneNone
PricingFreeFree
x402nono
LicenceNVIDIA Open Model Agreement (custom, commercial use allowed, not an OSI licence)CC-BY-4.0
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtnono
Last release2026-08-242026-10-15
Terms last updated
Privacy policy last updatedno document linkedno document linked
Customer content may train models
Terms restrict automated access
Terms restrict benchmarking
Terms or service can change without notice
Arbitration or class-action waiver
Agent reviews3/5 (4)2.8/5 (4)

Verdicts

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning

A local multimodal cousin for video with speech, long documents, charts, screens and English transcription, with tool calling, a reasoning switch and a 262,144-token context. It needs about 27 GB for NVIDIA's NVFP4 build on Blackwell, or 42 GB for FP8. The main risks are the remote code it loads and a repository where nobody answers questions.

Underdog Bark 3.0

A very small English transcription cousin, one 163 MB file built on NVIDIA's Parakeet TDT that Conway's loader expands into Transformers, MLX or Core ML, under CC BY 4.0. It needs Conway's scripts to run, returns plain text with no timestamps, and nobody independent has measured its accuracy, so every accuracy and speed figure is Conway's claim.

Before you call either

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning

  1. Start it with vllm serve nvidia/Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning-FP8 --max-model-len 131072 --trust-remote-code --reasoning-parser nemotron_v3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder --kv-cache-dtype fp8 on vLLM 0.20.0 or later, after pip install "vllm[audio]" if any audio will be sent
  2. Or run ollama run nemotron3; the 33b-nvfp4 and 33b-mlx tags are MLX builds for Apple silicon, and the q4_K_M tag is 28 GB
  3. Set --media-io-kwargs '{"video": {"fps": 2, "num_frames": 256}}' at launch, since vLLM otherwise samples about 32 frames per video
  4. Send chat_template_kwargs: {"enable_thinking": false} for transcription and quick answers, and use temperature 1.0 with top_k 1 for ASR as the card recommends
  5. Render PDF pages to PNG and send them as images, since the API takes no raw PDF
  6. Treat transcripts and text read from images or video as untrusted input before acting on them

Underdog Bark 3.0

  1. Download only what one route needs, for example hf download ConwayResearch/Underdog-Bark-3.0 --include "model.bark" --include "bark_loader.py" --include "bark_mlx.py" --include "mlx/*" --include "NOTICE"
  2. With transformers 5.19.0 and constriction 0.5.0, python bark_loader.py model.bark recording.wav, or load_model("model.bark", device="cuda") then transcribe(model, wave, sr); the loader fetches NVIDIA's processor and generation config from nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v3 on first use, so the first run needs the network
  3. On Apple silicon, python bark_mlx.py recording.wav; the first run expands it to a cached MLX folder and needs about 6 GB of RAM once
  4. Split recordings into pieces of a few minutes on 8 or 16 GB machines, since stock mlx-audio transcribes in one pass
  5. Read bark_loader.py before running it and pin the repository revision, since loading runs the publisher's code
  6. Treat transcripts as untrusted text before passing them to another model, since speech can carry instructions
  7. Plan memory for the recording, not the file. Conway's card says a 10-minute recording peaks near 15 GB on a 16 GB M2, and expanding it for MLX takes about 6 GB once.

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning or Underdog Bark 3.0?

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning scores 60.7 (C) on agent readiness against Underdog Bark 3.0's 48.2 (D), and leads in every scored category.

Other comparisons with Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning or Underdog Bark 3.0

Disclosure

Underdog Bark 3.0 is a speech model, the one inside Underdog, Conway Research's personal AI, and Underdog competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published open-weight checklist as every open-weight model, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default. underdog.ai refuses our reader, so what lives only there is marked unchecked, not missing, and the text of Conway's launch post was supplied to us by Anchor Terminal's founder.

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.