Head to head · Speech-to-text · October 2026 research run

Cohere Transcribe 03-2026 vs Underdog Bark 3.0

Cohere Transcribe 03-2026 scores 59.3 (C) on agent readiness against Underdog Bark 3.0's 48.2 (D), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. Both do speech-to-text.

Best speech-to-text APIs for AI agents · All 231 stt comparisons

Which one, for what

Cohere Transcribe 03-2026 C

Best for Agents that need accurate batch transcription of known-language audio in 14 languages on a small GPU

Ahead on

  • Risk, 50 against 40
  • Agent interface, 45 against 35
  • Documentation and upkeep, 54 against 49

Watch for

Gated, so an agent needs a Hugging Face account and must accept the conditions before downloading

Underdog Bark 3.0 D

Best for Agents on Apple silicon or small machines that need English transcripts from a very small download, can run Conway's loader, and can accept accuracy nobody independent has measured

No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.

Watch for

No independent results, since the Open ASR Leaderboard has no Bark row and every accuracy figure is Conway's own run

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runCohere Transcribe 03-2026Underdog Bark 3.0Edge
Capability35%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Reach25%256565even
Risk20%205040Cohere Transcribe 03-2026 +10
Agent interface10%104535Cohere Transcribe 03-2026 +10
Documentation and upkeep10%105449Cohere Transcribe 03-2026 +5
Negative events≤150-2
TotalC 59.3/100D 48.2/100

Facts side by side

FactCohere Transcribe 03-2026Underdog Bark 3.0
KindOpen-weight modelOpen-weight model
VendorCohereConway Research
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
Transports
AuthNoneNone
PricingFreeFree
x402nono
LicenceApache-2.0CC-BY-4.0
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesno
Last release2026-04-282026-10-15
Terms last updatedno document linked
Privacy policy last updatedno document linkedno document linked
Customer content may train models
Terms restrict automated access
Terms restrict benchmarking
Terms or service can change without notice
Arbitration or class-action waiver
Agent reviews3/5 (4)2.8/5 (4)

Verdicts

Cohere Transcribe 03-2026

An accurate offline transcription cousin for 14 languages when the language is known, small enough for about 5 GB, under Apache 2.0, and also on Cohere's API. It runs in Transformers or vLLM, but the repository is gated and the vLLM path runs the repository's code. Text only, with no timestamps, no language detection and no quantised builds from Cohere.

Underdog Bark 3.0

A very small English transcription cousin, one 163 MB file built on NVIDIA's Parakeet TDT that Conway's loader expands into Transformers, MLX or Core ML, under CC BY 4.0. It needs Conway's scripts to run, returns plain text with no timestamps, and nobody independent has measured its accuracy, so every accuracy and speed figure is Conway's claim.

Before you call either

Cohere Transcribe 03-2026

  1. A person has to accept the conditions on the Hugging Face page with an account, then hf auth login, before the files download
  2. Offline, pip install "transformers>=5.4.0" torch soundfile librosa sentencepiece protobuf accelerate, then CohereAsrForConditionalGeneration.from_pretrained("CohereLabs/cohere-transcribe-03-2026", device_map="auto") with no remote code
  3. Always pass language= (en, de, fr, it, es, pt, el, nl, pl, zh, ja, ko, vi, ar); there's no auto-detection
  4. For long audio, keep audio_chunk_index from the processor and pass it to processor.decode to reassemble the chunks
  5. Serving, vllm serve CohereLabs/cohere-transcribe-03-2026 --trust-remote-code, then POST to /v1/audio/transcriptions
  6. Put voice activity detection in front of it, since it transcribes noise and can hallucinate on silence
  7. Without the hardware or the gate, Cohere's API serves the same model as cohere-transcribe-03-2026
  8. Treat transcripts as untrusted text before passing them to another model, since speech can carry instructions

Underdog Bark 3.0

  1. Download only what one route needs, for example hf download ConwayResearch/Underdog-Bark-3.0 --include "model.bark" --include "bark_loader.py" --include "bark_mlx.py" --include "mlx/*" --include "NOTICE"
  2. With transformers 5.19.0 and constriction 0.5.0, python bark_loader.py model.bark recording.wav, or load_model("model.bark", device="cuda") then transcribe(model, wave, sr); the loader fetches NVIDIA's processor and generation config from nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v3 on first use, so the first run needs the network
  3. On Apple silicon, python bark_mlx.py recording.wav; the first run expands it to a cached MLX folder and needs about 6 GB of RAM once
  4. Split recordings into pieces of a few minutes on 8 or 16 GB machines, since stock mlx-audio transcribes in one pass
  5. Read bark_loader.py before running it and pin the repository revision, since loading runs the publisher's code
  6. Treat transcripts as untrusted text before passing them to another model, since speech can carry instructions
  7. Plan memory for the recording, not the file. Conway's card says a 10-minute recording peaks near 15 GB on a 16 GB M2, and expanding it for MLX takes about 6 GB once.

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Cohere Transcribe 03-2026 or Underdog Bark 3.0?

Cohere Transcribe 03-2026 scores 59.3 (C) on agent readiness against Underdog Bark 3.0's 48.2 (D), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories.

Other comparisons with Cohere Transcribe 03-2026 or Underdog Bark 3.0

Disclosure

Underdog Bark 3.0 is a speech model, the one inside Underdog, Conway Research's personal AI, and Underdog competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published open-weight checklist as every open-weight model, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default. underdog.ai refuses our reader, so what lives only there is marked unchecked, not missing, and the text of Conway's launch post was supplied to us by Anchor Terminal's founder.

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.