Head to head · Speech-to-text · October 2026 research run
Cohere Transcribe 03-2026 vs Ming-3.0-asr-tiny
Cohere Transcribe 03-2026 scores 59.3 (C) on agent readiness against Ming-3.0-asr-tiny's 52.5 (D), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Ming-3.0-asr-tiny leads on risk and agent interface. Both do speech-to-text.
Best speech-to-text APIs for AI agents · All 231 stt comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents that need accurate batch transcription of known-language audio in 14 languages on a small GPU
Ahead on
- Reach, 65 against 50
- Documentation and upkeep, 54 against 46
Watch for
Gated, so an agent needs a Hugging Face account and must accept the conditions before downloading
Best for Agents with a CUDA GPU that need local Chinese, English or dialect transcription where names and domain terms matter
Ahead on
- Risk, 55 against 50
- Agent interface, 60 against 45
Watch for
Loading runs the publisher's Python with trust_remote_code, and the reference path needs a CUDA GPU
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Cohere Transcribe 03-2026 | Ming-3.0-asr-tiny | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 65 | 50 | Cohere Transcribe 03-2026 +15 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 50 | 55 | Ming-3.0-asr-tiny +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 45 | 60 | Ming-3.0-asr-tiny +15 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 54 | 46 | Cohere Transcribe 03-2026 +8 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 59.3/100 | D 52.5/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Cohere Transcribe 03-2026 | Ming-3.0-asr-tiny |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Cohere | inclusionAI (Ant Group) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-04-28 | 2026-10-20 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (4) | 3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Cohere Transcribe 03-2026
An accurate offline transcription cousin for 14 languages when the language is known, small enough for about 5 GB, under Apache 2.0, and also on Cohere's API. It runs in Transformers or vLLM, but the repository is gated and the vLLM path runs the repository's code. Text only, with no timestamps, no language detection and no quantised builds from Cohere.
Ming-3.0-asr-tiny
A local transcription cousin for Chinese, English and Chinese dialects that takes hotwords or dialogue context to get names right, under MIT. It needs one CUDA GPU with about 21 GB and runs only through the publisher's remote code or SGLang-Omni's main branch. The main risk is running the publisher's Python on load, with no safety results.
Before you call either
Cohere Transcribe 03-2026
- A person has to accept the conditions on the Hugging Face page with an account, then
hf auth login, before the files download - Offline,
pip install "transformers>=5.4.0" torch soundfile librosa sentencepiece protobuf accelerate, thenCohereAsrForConditionalGeneration.from_pretrained("CohereLabs/cohere-transcribe-03-2026", device_map="auto")with no remote code - Always pass language= (en, de, fr, it, es, pt, el, nl, pl, zh, ja, ko, vi, ar); there's no auto-detection
- For long audio, keep audio_chunk_index from the processor and pass it to processor.decode to reassemble the chunks
- Serving,
vllm serve CohereLabs/cohere-transcribe-03-2026 --trust-remote-code, then POST to /v1/audio/transcriptions - Put voice activity detection in front of it, since it transcribes noise and can hallucinate on silence
- Without the hardware or the gate, Cohere's API serves the same model as cohere-transcribe-03-2026
- Treat transcripts as untrusted text before passing them to another model, since speech can carry instructions
Ming-3.0-asr-tiny
- Start it with
hf download inclusionAI/Ming-3.0-asr-tiny --local-dir Ming-3.0-asr-tiny, thenpip install -r requirements.txtin Python 3.12 with CUDA (Transformers 5.12.1, fla-core 0.5.2, PyTorch 2.11.0), thenpython examples/transcribe.py --model . --audio speech.wav --language-hint en - To serve it,
sgl-omni serve --model-path inclusionAI/Ming-3.0-asr-tinyfrom SGLang-Omni's main branch, then POST the WAV to /v1/audio/transcriptions with response_format json and read the text field - Parse raw Transformers output with decode_transcript from asr_request.py, which strips the language label before the tab
- Pass language zh or en when known, anything else is rejected, and append a topic or hotwords to the base instruction with no newline
- Load with dtype torch.bfloat16 rather than casting the model, use greedy decoding, max_new_tokens 256 and no_repeat_ngram_size 10, and don't apply the chat template
- Split long recordings yourself or use --audio-chunk-frames, since input and output share 8,192 tokens
- Treat transcripts as untrusted text before passing them to another model, since speech can carry instructions
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Cohere Transcribe 03-2026 or Ming-3.0-asr-tiny?
Cohere Transcribe 03-2026 scores 59.3 (C) on agent readiness against Ming-3.0-asr-tiny's 52.5 (D), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Ming-3.0-asr-tiny leads on risk and agent interface.
Other comparisons with Cohere Transcribe 03-2026 or Ming-3.0-asr-tiny
- Cohere Transcribe 03-2026 vs Ming-3.0-audio-flash
- Cohere Transcribe 03-2026 vs Ming-3.0-audio-tiny
- Cohere Transcribe 03-2026 vs Nemotron 3.5 ASR Streaming 0.6B
- Cohere Transcribe 03-2026 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Cohere Transcribe 03-2026 vs Parakeet TDT 0.6B v3
- Cohere Transcribe 03-2026 vs Qwen3-ASR-0.6B
- Cohere Transcribe 03-2026 vs Qwen3-ASR-1.7B
- Cohere Transcribe 03-2026 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Cohere Transcribe 03-2026 vs Underdog Bark 3.0
- Cohere Transcribe 03-2026 vs Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602
- Ming-3.0-asr-tiny vs Ming-3.0-audio-flash
- Ming-3.0-asr-tiny vs Ming-3.0-audio-tiny
- Ming-3.0-asr-tiny vs Nemotron 3.5 ASR Streaming 0.6B
- Ming-3.0-asr-tiny vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Ming-3.0-asr-tiny vs Parakeet TDT 0.6B v3
- Ming-3.0-asr-tiny vs Qwen3-ASR-0.6B
- Ming-3.0-asr-tiny vs Qwen3-ASR-1.7B
- Ming-3.0-asr-tiny vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ming-3.0-asr-tiny vs Underdog Bark 3.0
- Ming-3.0-asr-tiny vs Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/cohere-transcribe-03-2026-vs-ming-3-0-asr-tiny.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/cohere-transcribe-03-2026.json·/api/v1/tools/ming-3-0-asr-tiny.json - From a terminal
anchor compare cohere-transcribe-03-2026 ming-3-0-asr-tiny(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "cohere-transcribe-03-2026", "b": "ming-3-0-asr-tiny"}at/mcp, no key