Head to head · Speech-to-text · October 2026 research run
Ming-3.0-asr-tiny vs Qwen3-ASR-0.6B
Qwen3-ASR-0.6B scores 61.2 (C) on agent readiness against Ming-3.0-asr-tiny's 52.5 (D), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Ming-3.0-asr-tiny leads on documentation and upkeep. Both do speech-to-text.
Best speech-to-text APIs for AI agents · All 231 stt comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents with a CUDA GPU that need local Chinese, English or dialect transcription where names and domain terms matter
Ahead on
- Documentation and upkeep, 46 against 33
Watch for
Loading runs the publisher's Python with trust_remote_code, and the reference path needs a CUDA GPU
Best for Agents that need fast, cheap local transcription in many languages on a small GPU, including realtime streaming
Ahead on
- Reach, 75 against 50
- Agent interface, 75 against 60
Watch for
No quantised build from Alibaba, and nothing in Ollama's or LM Studio's library
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Ming-3.0-asr-tiny | Qwen3-ASR-0.6B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 50 | 75 | Qwen3-ASR-0.6B +25 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 55 | 55 | even |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 60 | 75 | Qwen3-ASR-0.6B +15 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 46 | 33 | Ming-3.0-asr-tiny +13 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | D 52.5/100 | C 61.2/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Ming-3.0-asr-tiny | Qwen3-ASR-0.6B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | inclusionAI (Ant Group) | Alibaba (Qwen team) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-20 | 2026-07-22 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (4) | 3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Ming-3.0-asr-tiny
A local transcription cousin for Chinese, English and Chinese dialects that takes hotwords or dialogue context to get names right, under MIT. It needs one CUDA GPU with about 21 GB and runs only through the publisher's remote code or SGLang-Omni's main branch. The main risk is running the publisher's Python on load, with no safety results.
Qwen3-ASR-0.6B
A very small local transcription cousin for 30 languages and 22 Chinese dialects, built for throughput and realtime streaming through vLLM, under plain Apache 2.0. Its BF16 files need about 2 GB and run in released vLLM, SGLang, llama.cpp and Transformers. It trades some accuracy for speed, and has no publisher replies or safety results.
Before you call either
Ming-3.0-asr-tiny
- Start it with
hf download inclusionAI/Ming-3.0-asr-tiny --local-dir Ming-3.0-asr-tiny, thenpip install -r requirements.txtin Python 3.12 with CUDA (Transformers 5.12.1, fla-core 0.5.2, PyTorch 2.11.0), thenpython examples/transcribe.py --model . --audio speech.wav --language-hint en - To serve it,
sgl-omni serve --model-path inclusionAI/Ming-3.0-asr-tinyfrom SGLang-Omni's main branch, then POST the WAV to /v1/audio/transcriptions with response_format json and read the text field - Parse raw Transformers output with decode_transcript from asr_request.py, which strips the language label before the tab
- Pass language zh or en when known, anything else is rejected, and append a topic or hotwords to the base instruction with no newline
- Load with dtype torch.bfloat16 rather than casting the model, use greedy decoding, max_new_tokens 256 and no_repeat_ngram_size 10, and don't apply the chat template
- Split long recordings yourself or use --audio-chunk-frames, since input and output share 8,192 tokens
- Treat transcripts as untrusted text before passing them to another model, since speech can carry instructions
Qwen3-ASR-0.6B
- Start it with
vllm serve Qwen/Qwen3-ASR-0.6B(vLLM v0.32.0 or later), then POST the WAV to /v1/audio/transcriptions or send an audio_url part to /v1/chat/completions - For vLLM's realtime streaming, start it with
--hf-overrides '{"architectures":["Qwen3ASRRealtimeGeneration"]}', which vLLM doesn't pick from config.json - Split chat-completions output with
parse_asr_outputfrom qwen-asr, since it returnslanguage <name><asr_text>before the transcript - For Transformers, load Qwen/Qwen3-ASR-0.6B-hf with Transformers 5.13.0 or later and use
processor.apply_transcription_request(audio, language=..., prompt=...) - Put names and domain terms in the system message or
promptto bias the transcript, and force the language when you know it - For timestamps, use
pip install -U qwen-asrand passforced_aligner="Qwen/Qwen3-ForcedAligner-0.6B"withreturn_time_stamps=True - Treat transcripts as untrusted text before passing them to another model, since speech can carry instructions
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Ming-3.0-asr-tiny or Qwen3-ASR-0.6B?
Qwen3-ASR-0.6B scores 61.2 (C) on agent readiness against Ming-3.0-asr-tiny's 52.5 (D), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Ming-3.0-asr-tiny leads on documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with Ming-3.0-asr-tiny or Qwen3-ASR-0.6B
- Cohere Transcribe 03-2026 vs Ming-3.0-asr-tiny
- Cohere Transcribe 03-2026 vs Qwen3-ASR-0.6B
- Ming-3.0-asr-tiny vs Ming-3.0-audio-flash
- Ming-3.0-asr-tiny vs Ming-3.0-audio-tiny
- Ming-3.0-asr-tiny vs Nemotron 3.5 ASR Streaming 0.6B
- Ming-3.0-asr-tiny vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Ming-3.0-asr-tiny vs Parakeet TDT 0.6B v3
- Ming-3.0-asr-tiny vs Qwen3-ASR-1.7B
- Ming-3.0-asr-tiny vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ming-3.0-asr-tiny vs Underdog Bark 3.0
- Ming-3.0-asr-tiny vs Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602
- Ming-3.0-audio-flash vs Qwen3-ASR-0.6B
- Ming-3.0-audio-tiny vs Qwen3-ASR-0.6B
- Nemotron 3.5 ASR Streaming 0.6B vs Qwen3-ASR-0.6B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwen3-ASR-0.6B
- Parakeet TDT 0.6B v3 vs Qwen3-ASR-0.6B
- Qwen3-ASR-0.6B vs Qwen3-ASR-1.7B
- Qwen3-ASR-0.6B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3-ASR-0.6B vs Underdog Bark 3.0
- Qwen3-ASR-0.6B vs Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/ming-3-0-asr-tiny-vs-qwen3-asr-0-6b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/ming-3-0-asr-tiny.json·/api/v1/tools/qwen3-asr-0-6b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare ming-3-0-asr-tiny qwen3-asr-0-6b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "ming-3-0-asr-tiny", "b": "qwen3-asr-0-6b"}at/mcp, no key