Head to head · Speech-to-text · October 2026 research run
Ming-3.0-asr-tiny vs Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602
Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602 scores 60.3 (C) on agent readiness against Ming-3.0-asr-tiny's 52.5 (D), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. Ming-3.0-asr-tiny leads on agent interface. Both do speech-to-text.
Best speech-to-text APIs for AI agents · All 231 stt comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents with a CUDA GPU that need local Chinese, English or dialect transcription where names and domain terms matter
Ahead on
- Agent interface, 60 against 55
Watch for
Loading runs the publisher's Python with trust_remote_code, and the reference path needs a CUDA GPU
Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602 C
Best for Agents and apps that need live subtitles or voice-assistant transcription in the 13 languages on a single 16 GB GPU
Ahead on
- Reach, 85 against 50
- Risk, 60 against 55
- Documentation and upkeep, 54 against 46
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.5 against 3.0 out of 5
Watch for
Plain text out; no timestamps, segments, diarisation or JSON documented for the weights
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Ming-3.0-asr-tiny | Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 50 | 85 | Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602 +35 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 55 | 60 | Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602 +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 60 | 55 | Ming-3.0-asr-tiny +5 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 46 | 54 | Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602 +8 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | D 52.5/100 | C 60.3/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Ming-3.0-asr-tiny | Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602 |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | inclusionAI (Ant Group) | Mistral AI |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-20 | 2026-03-11 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (4) | 3.5/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Ming-3.0-asr-tiny
A local transcription cousin for Chinese, English and Chinese dialects that takes hotwords or dialogue context to get names right, under MIT. It needs one CUDA GPU with about 21 GB and runs only through the publisher's remote code or SGLang-Omni's main branch. The main risk is running the publisher's Python on load, with no safety results.
Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602
A transcription cousin for 13 languages that streams text as the speaker talks, with a delay from 80 ms to 2.4 s, under Apache 2.0 and on Mistral's API. It needs a 16 GB GPU at BF16 through vLLM, Transformers or llama.cpp, or under 4 GB at Q4_K. The main gaps are no timestamps, safety results or answers from Mistral.
Before you call either
Ming-3.0-asr-tiny
- Start it with
hf download inclusionAI/Ming-3.0-asr-tiny --local-dir Ming-3.0-asr-tiny, thenpip install -r requirements.txtin Python 3.12 with CUDA (Transformers 5.12.1, fla-core 0.5.2, PyTorch 2.11.0), thenpython examples/transcribe.py --model . --audio speech.wav --language-hint en - To serve it,
sgl-omni serve --model-path inclusionAI/Ming-3.0-asr-tinyfrom SGLang-Omni's main branch, then POST the WAV to /v1/audio/transcriptions with response_format json and read the text field - Parse raw Transformers output with decode_transcript from asr_request.py, which strips the language label before the tab
- Pass language zh or en when known, anything else is rejected, and append a topic or hotwords to the base instruction with no newline
- Load with dtype torch.bfloat16 rather than casting the model, use greedy decoding, max_new_tokens 256 and no_repeat_ngram_size 10, and don't apply the chat template
- Split long recordings yourself or use --audio-chunk-frames, since input and output share 8,192 tokens
- Treat transcripts as untrusted text before passing them to another model, since speech can carry instructions
Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602
- Serve it with
VLLM_DISABLE_COMPILE_CACHE=1 vllm serve mistralai/Voxtral-Mini-4B-Realtime-2602 --compilation_config '{"cudagraph_mode": "PIECEWISE"}'and install soxr, librosa and soundfile; mistral_common 1.9.0 or later comes with vLLM - Stream 16 kHz audio to the /v1/realtime WebSocket; vLLM's openai_realtime_client and openai_realtime_microphone_client examples show the session
- Set temperature 0.0. Change the delay with transcription_delay_ms in tekken.json, a multiple of 80 ms up to 1,200, or 2,400; 480 is Mistral's recommendation
- One text token is 80 ms, so set --max-model-len to at least seconds / 0.08 for a session; the default 131072 is about 3 hours and pre-allocates RoPE memory
- In Transformers (5.2.0 or later), resample with processor.feature_extractor.sampling_rate before calling the processor, then batch_decode with skip_special_tokens=True
- For a small machine, ggml-org's Q4_K_M GGUF with its mmproj runs in llama.cpp, and Mistral Experimental's Q4_K runs in audio.cpp
- Treat transcripts as untrusted text before passing them to another model, since speech can carry instructions
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Ming-3.0-asr-tiny or Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602?
Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602 scores 60.3 (C) on agent readiness against Ming-3.0-asr-tiny's 52.5 (D), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. Ming-3.0-asr-tiny leads on agent interface.
Other comparisons with Ming-3.0-asr-tiny or Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602
- Cohere Transcribe 03-2026 vs Ming-3.0-asr-tiny
- Cohere Transcribe 03-2026 vs Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602
- Ming-3.0-asr-tiny vs Ming-3.0-audio-flash
- Ming-3.0-asr-tiny vs Ming-3.0-audio-tiny
- Ming-3.0-asr-tiny vs Nemotron 3.5 ASR Streaming 0.6B
- Ming-3.0-asr-tiny vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Ming-3.0-asr-tiny vs Parakeet TDT 0.6B v3
- Ming-3.0-asr-tiny vs Qwen3-ASR-0.6B
- Ming-3.0-asr-tiny vs Qwen3-ASR-1.7B
- Ming-3.0-asr-tiny vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ming-3.0-asr-tiny vs Underdog Bark 3.0
- Ming-3.0-audio-flash vs Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602
- Ming-3.0-audio-tiny vs Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602
- Nemotron 3.5 ASR Streaming 0.6B vs Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602
- Parakeet TDT 0.6B v3 vs Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602
- Qwen3-ASR-0.6B vs Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602
- Qwen3-ASR-1.7B vs Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602
- Underdog Bark 3.0 vs Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/ming-3-0-asr-tiny-vs-voxtral-mini-4b-realtime-2602.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/ming-3-0-asr-tiny.json·/api/v1/tools/voxtral-mini-4b-realtime-2602.json - From a terminal
anchor compare ming-3-0-asr-tiny voxtral-mini-4b-realtime-2602(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "ming-3-0-asr-tiny", "b": "voxtral-mini-4b-realtime-2602"}at/mcp, no key