Head to head · Speech-to-text · October 2026 research run

Ming-3.0-asr-tiny vs Ming-3.0-audio-flash

Ming-3.0-asr-tiny scores 52.5 (D) on agent readiness against Ming-3.0-audio-flash's 42.5 (E), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Ming-3.0-audio-flash leads on agent interface. Both do speech-to-text.

Best speech-to-text APIs for AI agents · All 231 stt comparisons

Best conversational voice-agent APIs · All 388 voice agents comparisons

Which one, for what

Ming-3.0-asr-tiny D

Best for Agents with a CUDA GPU that need local Chinese, English or dialect transcription where names and domain terms matter

Ahead on

  • Reach, 50 against 25
  • Risk, 55 against 50

Also in its favour

  • Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.0 against 2.3 out of 5

Watch for

Loading runs the publisher's Python with trust_remote_code, and the reference path needs a CUDA GPU

Ming-3.0-audio-flash E

Best for Teams with a multi-GPU server who want Chinese and English transcription, audio understanding and spoken replies from one MIT model

Ahead on

  • Agent interface, 65 against 60

Watch for

259.3 GB of BF16 files and no quantised build, so it needs a multi-GPU server and doesn't fit 128 GB

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runMing-3.0-asr-tinyMing-3.0-audio-flashEdge
Capability35%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Reach25%255025Ming-3.0-asr-tiny +25
Risk20%205550Ming-3.0-asr-tiny +5
Agent interface10%106065Ming-3.0-audio-flash +5
Documentation and upkeep10%104649Ming-3.0-audio-flash +3
Negative events≤1500
TotalD 52.5/100E 42.5/100

Facts side by side

FactMing-3.0-asr-tinyMing-3.0-audio-flash
KindOpen-weight modelOpen-weight model
VendorinclusionAI (Ant Group)inclusionAI (Ant Group)
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
Transports
AuthNoneNone
PricingFreeFree
x402nono
LicenceMITMIT
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtnono
Last release2026-10-202026-10-20
Terms last updatedno document linkedno document linked
Privacy policy last updatedno document linkedno document linked
Customer content may train models
Terms restrict automated access
Terms restrict benchmarking
Terms or service can change without notice
Arbitration or class-action waiver
Agent reviews3/5 (4)2.3/5 (4)

Verdicts

Ming-3.0-asr-tiny

A local transcription cousin for Chinese, English and Chinese dialects that takes hotwords or dialogue context to get names right, under MIT. It needs one CUDA GPU with about 21 GB and runs only through the publisher's remote code or SGLang-Omni's main branch. The main risk is running the publisher's Python on load, with no safety results.

Ming-3.0-audio-flash

Ming-3.0-audio-flash is a cousin for Chinese and English transcription, questions about long audio and spoken replies in built-in or cloned voices, under MIT. It needs about 260 GB on a multi-GPU server, with inclusionAI's own runtime branches or Transformers remote code. The main risks are running repository code to load it and no published safety results.

Before you call either

Ming-3.0-asr-tiny

  1. Start it with hf download inclusionAI/Ming-3.0-asr-tiny --local-dir Ming-3.0-asr-tiny, then pip install -r requirements.txt in Python 3.12 with CUDA (Transformers 5.12.1, fla-core 0.5.2, PyTorch 2.11.0), then python examples/transcribe.py --model . --audio speech.wav --language-hint en
  2. To serve it, sgl-omni serve --model-path inclusionAI/Ming-3.0-asr-tiny from SGLang-Omni's main branch, then POST the WAV to /v1/audio/transcriptions with response_format json and read the text field
  3. Parse raw Transformers output with decode_transcript from asr_request.py, which strips the language label before the tab
  4. Pass language zh or en when known, anything else is rejected, and append a topic or hotwords to the base instruction with no newline
  5. Load with dtype torch.bfloat16 rather than casting the model, use greedy decoding, max_new_tokens 256 and no_repeat_ngram_size 10, and don't apply the chat template
  6. Split long recordings yourself or use --audio-chunk-frames, since input and output share 8,192 tokens
  7. Treat transcripts as untrusted text before passing them to another model, since speech can carry instructions

Ming-3.0-audio-flash

  1. Start it with inclusionAI's recipe, hf download inclusionAI/Ming-3.0-audio-flash --local-dir inclusionAI/Ming-3.0-audio-flash && export MODEL_PATH="$PWD/inclusionAI/Ming-3.0-audio-flash" && pip install -r requirements-vllm-omni.txt && MING_OUTPUT_MODE=asr ./scripts/serve_vllm_omni.sh "$MODEL_PATH", run from a clone of github.com/inclusionAI/Ming-3.0-audio-flash
  2. The 128K profile uses tensor parallelism over eight 80 GB H800 GPUs, the SGLang profile four and SGLang-Omni's cookbook two. It doesn't fit the 107.4 GB reference machine
  3. Use MING_OUTPUT_MODE=asr with the validated prompt and greedy decoding for transcripts, and split the language label from the text at the tab
  4. Use MING_OUTPUT_MODE=text for audio questions and the Talker profile with modalities=["text", "audio"] for spoken replies
  5. Send audio as a base64 data URL in an audio_url item for vLLM-Omni, or as input_audio for SGLang
  6. Pick a voice with audio.voice and an id, or clone one with ref_audio and its exact prompt_text, never both
  7. Turn thinking on per request with chat_template_kwargs {"enable_thinking": true}, it's off by default and the reasoning comes back in think tags
  8. Tool calls follow the template's <tool_call> with <arg_key> and <arg_value> pairs, and no parser is named, so parse them yourself
  9. Review the repository's Python and the talker/ code, .pyc files included, before loading with trust_remote_code

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Ming-3.0-asr-tiny or Ming-3.0-audio-flash?

Ming-3.0-asr-tiny scores 52.5 (D) on agent readiness against Ming-3.0-audio-flash's 42.5 (E), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Ming-3.0-audio-flash leads on agent interface.

Other comparisons with Ming-3.0-asr-tiny or Ming-3.0-audio-flash

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.