Granite Speech 5.0 2B vs Ming-3.0-audio-flash

Granite Speech 5.0 2B 95

Memory 30, the smallest build listed that keeps 4 bits is IBM's Q4_K_M GGUF, 1.14 GB with the 1.16 GB audio projector, and 2.30 GB × 1.2 = 2.8 GB, within 16 GB. IBM recommends Q8_0, 3.12 GB with the projector. Runtimes 20, Released Transformers 5.22.2 and vLLM 0.33.0 have the granite_speech model, llama.cpp b12242 has its converter and audio front end, and Ollama carries it as ibm/granite5-speech, which the card says was tested with v0.40.15. Builds 15, IBM publishes GGUF builds at fourteen quantised precisions, from Q2_K to Q8_0, with the audio projector. Terms 15, Apache 2.0 in the metadata and on the card, with nothing added. Download 10, the Hub API reports gated false for both repositories on 10 November 2026, so the files download with no account and nothing to accept. Hosted 5, IBM runs a Hugging Face Inference Endpoint that serves this model through an OpenAI-compatible API, with the address and code on the card. 30 + 20 + 15 + 15 + 10 + 5 = 95.

Ming-3.0-audio-flash 25

Memory earns 0, because the only build is inclusionAI's BF16 release at 259.3 GB, and a fifth on top is 311.2 GB, above the 256 GB band. Runtimes earn 0, since no named runtime runs the audio model from its own released code. Transformers needs the repository's remote code, vLLM and SGLang need inclusionAI's fork branches, vLLM-Omni and SGLang-Omni aren't on the list, and llama.cpp, Ollama and LM Studio don't have it. Builds earn 0 with BF16 only. Terms earn 15 for MIT with nothing added. Download earns 10, since the repository isn't gated. Hosted earns 0, with no inference provider on its Hugging Face page, none on OpenRouter and no inclusionAI API for it.

Granite Speech 5.0 2B 92

Model card 17, Intended use, limitations, the architecture, the size, the 16K positions and two-minute segments, and the languages are on the card. Training data 20, the data is listed with sources and sizes: a 39-row table giving each corpus, its task, its hours and a link to where it comes from, with the synthetic sets described. Last change 20, the last commit, on 6 November 2026, updated the card, 4 days before this check. Responsiveness 20, Both discussions that aren't pull requests (21 and 28 October 2026) have a reply from an ibm-granite member. Version policy 5, granite-speech-4.1-2b stays in its own repository and 5.0 came out in a new one, which names its predecessor and gives a release date. File health 10, Config, template and card agree on the architecture and the 16K positions. 17 + 20 + 20 + 20 + 5 + 10 = 92.

Ming-3.0-audio-flash 49

The model card earns 14, covering five of the seven points and missing limitations and a knowledge cut-off. Training data earns 0, with nothing described. Last change earns 20, with the voice interface, examples and inclusionAI's runtime branch all changed between 18 and 20 October 2026. Responsiveness earns 0, because nobody has asked a question yet in the Hugging Face discussions and GitHub issues couldn't be counted. Version policy earns 5 for a first release in its own repository. File health earns 10, with config, tokenizer, template and card in agreement and no broken-file report waiting.

Granite Speech 5.0 2B 70

File safety 25, safetensors and GGUF only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files and no Python in either repository. Provenance 15, the files sit in the ibm-granite organisation, which IBM's Granite docs link to (10). Safety evaluation 0, no safety results on the card. Agent guidance 10, the card says what the model does with a prompt it doesn't know: it ignores an unfamiliar or malformed prompt and transcribes, which it says limits how audio can steer the system. Licence risk 15, Apache 2.0 with no use policy, no threshold and no right to change the terms. Security programme 5, www.ibm.com/.well-known/security.txt names IBM PSIRT, read for the Granite 4.2 3B listing on 4 November 2026 (5). 25 + 15 + 0 + 10 + 15 + 5 = 70.

Ming-3.0-audio-flash 50

File safety earns 15, safetensors weights with no pickle files, less 10 because loading needs trust_remote_code and speech output imports Python from the model directory, which also ships compiled .pyc files. Provenance earns 15, files in inclusionAI's own organisation, linked from its site, and a checksum on every file. Safety evaluation earns 0, with none published. Agent guidance earns 0, since the only caution is about reviewing code before loading it. Licence risk keeps 15 under plain MIT. The security programme earns 5 for Ant Group's AntSRC reporting centre, read as a company-wide route the way Google's was for Gemma, while advisories handled in public weren't found or couldn't be checked on GitHub.

Granite Speech 5.0 2B 55

Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository (193 characters). Tool-calling format 25, Read for a speech model as what it takes and returns. Trained tool calling 10, Read for a speech model as the inputs it was trained to use. Structured output 0, Read for a speech model as typed outputs. Reasoning control 0, A speech model with no reasoning. Context 0, the language model is extended to 16K positions, per the card and config.json (16,384), below the 32K band, and the card says to send audio in segments of about two minutes. 20 + 25 + 10 + 0 + 0 + 0 = 55.

Ming-3.0-audio-flash 65

This model has a chat interface with function calls as well as speech, so the tool-calling line is read for its tool calls, as for Ming-3.0-audio-tiny, and structured output for what it returns. The chat template earns 20, a Jinja file in the repository. The tool-calling format earns 10, because function tools are declared and returned only as the template says, with no parser named, though inclusionAI's README documents the audio requests and replies for its vLLM-Omni and SGLang servers. Trained tool calling earns 20 from inclusionAI's own tool-calling sample and a template that renders several calls in one turn. Structured output earns 5, since the transcript form and audio format are documented but no timestamps or JSON output are. Reasoning control earns 0, because thinking switches per request but where its text comes back isn't documented. Context earns 10 for 131,072 tokens with no scaling.