Head to head · Speech-to-text · October 2026 research run
Ming-3.0-audio-flash vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
Ming-3.0-audio-flash and Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 42.5 (E) and 41.8 (E). Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct leads on reach and risk. Both do speech-to-text.
Best speech-to-text APIs for AI agents · All 231 stt comparisons
Best conversational voice-agent APIs · All 388 voice agents comparisons
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Teams with a multi-GPU server who want Chinese and English transcription, audio understanding and spoken replies from one MIT model
Ahead on
- Agent interface, 65 against 60
- Documentation and upkeep, 49 against 26
Watch for
259.3 GB of BF16 files and no quantised build, so it needs a multi-GPU server and doesn't fit 128 GB
Best for Agents on a machine with about 96 GB to spare that need one local model to hear, see and answer by voice
Ahead on
- Reach, 55 against 25
- Risk, 55 against 50
Watch for
Only a 70.5 GB BF16 build, about 85 GB to run, with no quantised build from Alibaba
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Ming-3.0-audio-flash | Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 25 | 55 | Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct +30 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 50 | 55 | Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 65 | 60 | Ming-3.0-audio-flash +5 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 49 | 26 | Ming-3.0-audio-flash +23 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | E 42.5/100 | E 41.8/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Ming-3.0-audio-flash | Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | inclusionAI (Ant Group) | Alibaba (Qwen team) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-20 | 2025-09-22 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 2.3/5 (4) | 2/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Ming-3.0-audio-flash
Ming-3.0-audio-flash is a cousin for Chinese and English transcription, questions about long audio and spoken replies in built-in or cloned voices, under MIT. It needs about 260 GB on a multi-GPU server, with inclusionAI's own runtime branches or Transformers remote code. The main risks are running repository code to load it and no published safety results.
Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
An omni-modal cousin that listens, watches and reads, then answers in text or one of three voices, with tool calls from spoken requests, under plain Apache 2.0. Its only build, BF16, needs about 85 GB, and speech out needs Transformers or vLLM-Omni. The main risk is no answers from Qwen and no safety work for speech-driven actions.
Before you call either
Ming-3.0-audio-flash
- Start it with inclusionAI's recipe,
hf download inclusionAI/Ming-3.0-audio-flash --local-dir inclusionAI/Ming-3.0-audio-flash && export MODEL_PATH="$PWD/inclusionAI/Ming-3.0-audio-flash" && pip install -r requirements-vllm-omni.txt && MING_OUTPUT_MODE=asr ./scripts/serve_vllm_omni.sh "$MODEL_PATH", run from a clone of github.com/inclusionAI/Ming-3.0-audio-flash - The 128K profile uses tensor parallelism over eight 80 GB H800 GPUs, the SGLang profile four and SGLang-Omni's cookbook two. It doesn't fit the 107.4 GB reference machine
- Use
MING_OUTPUT_MODE=asrwith the validated prompt and greedy decoding for transcripts, and split the language label from the text at the tab - Use
MING_OUTPUT_MODE=textfor audio questions and the Talker profile withmodalities=["text", "audio"]for spoken replies - Send audio as a base64 data URL in an
audio_urlitem for vLLM-Omni, or asinput_audiofor SGLang - Pick a voice with
audio.voiceand an id, or clone one withref_audioand its exactprompt_text, never both - Turn thinking on per request with
chat_template_kwargs{"enable_thinking": true}, it's off by default and the reasoning comes back in think tags - Tool calls follow the template's
<tool_call>with<arg_key>and<arg_value>pairs, and no parser is named, so parse them yourself - Review the repository's Python and the talker/ code, .pyc files included, before loading with trust_remote_code
Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- For text answers,
mkdir -p media && vllm serve Qwen/Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct --dtype bfloat16 --max-model-len 32768 --allowed-local-media-path "$(pwd)/media"with vLLM 0.11.1 or later serves the Thinker on an OpenAI-compatible API - The card's command passes
--allowed-local-media-path /, which lets anyone who can reach the server have it read any file on the machine through a file:// URL. Point it at a dedicated folder that holds only the media you mean to send, as above, and give vLLM an absolute path - Send audio as
audio_urland images asimage_urlcontent parts; vLLM serve doesn't take use_audio_in_video, so pass a video's audio separately - For speech out, load Qwen3OmniMoeForConditionalGeneration in Transformers 4.57.0 or later with qwen-omni-utils, pick speaker Ethan, Chelsie or Aiden, and write the returned waveform at 24 kHz
- Call model.disable_talker() or pass return_audio=False when you only need text, which saves about 10 GB and time
- Parse tool calls as JSON inside
<tool_call>tags yourself, since no parser is named, and confirm actions triggered by speech before running them - Keep use_audio_in_video the same across every step of a conversation, the card warns results go wrong otherwise
- Budget memory for video, the card's table rises from 78.85 GB for 15 seconds to 144.81 GB for 120 seconds in BF16
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Ming-3.0-audio-flash or Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct?
Ming-3.0-audio-flash and Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 42.5 (E) and 41.8 (E). Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct leads on reach and risk.
Other comparisons with Ming-3.0-audio-flash or Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Agents-A1-4B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- BigBang-v1 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Hy3 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Inkling vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.6-27B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Cohere Transcribe 03-2026 vs Ming-3.0-audio-flash
- Cohere Transcribe 03-2026 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ming-3.0-asr-tiny vs Ming-3.0-audio-flash
- Ming-3.0-asr-tiny vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ming-3.0-audio-flash vs Ming-3.0-audio-tiny
- Ming-3.0-audio-flash vs Nemotron 3.5 ASR Streaming 0.6B
- Ming-3.0-audio-flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Ming-3.0-audio-flash vs Parakeet TDT 0.6B v3
- Ming-3.0-audio-flash vs Qwen3-ASR-0.6B
- Ming-3.0-audio-flash vs Qwen3-ASR-1.7B
- Ming-3.0-audio-flash vs Underdog Bark 3.0
- Ming-3.0-audio-flash vs Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602
- Ming-3.0-audio-tiny vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3.5 ASR Streaming 0.6B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Parakeet TDT 0.6B v3 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3-ASR-0.6B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3-ASR-1.7B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Underdog Bark 3.0
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/ming-3-0-audio-flash-vs-qwen3-omni-30b-a3b-instruct.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/ming-3-0-audio-flash.json·/api/v1/tools/qwen3-omni-30b-a3b-instruct.json - From a terminal
anchor compare ming-3-0-audio-flash qwen3-omni-30b-a3b-instruct(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "ming-3-0-audio-flash", "b": "qwen3-omni-30b-a3b-instruct"}at/mcp, no key