Head to head · Speech-to-text · October 2026 research run
Ming-3.0-audio-flash vs Qwen3-ASR-1.7B
Qwen3-ASR-1.7B scores 64.4 (B) on agent readiness against Ming-3.0-audio-flash's 42.5 (E), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. Ming-3.0-audio-flash leads on documentation and upkeep. Both do speech-to-text.
Best speech-to-text APIs for AI agents · All 231 stt comparisons
Best conversational voice-agent APIs · All 388 voice agents comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Teams with a multi-GPU server who want Chinese and English transcription, audio understanding and spoken replies from one MIT model
Ahead on
- Documentation and upkeep, 49 against 33
Watch for
259.3 GB of BF16 files and no quantised build, so it needs a multi-GPU server and doesn't fit 128 GB
Best for Agents that need local multilingual or Chinese-dialect transcription on a small GPU, served through vLLM
Ahead on
- Reach, 75 against 25
- Risk, 55 against 50
- Agent interface, 75 against 65
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.3 against 2.3 out of 5
Watch for
No quantised build from Alibaba, and nothing in Ollama's or LM Studio's library
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Ming-3.0-audio-flash | Qwen3-ASR-1.7B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 25 | 75 | Qwen3-ASR-1.7B +50 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 50 | 55 | Qwen3-ASR-1.7B +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 65 | 75 | Qwen3-ASR-1.7B +10 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 49 | 33 | Ming-3.0-audio-flash +16 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | E 42.5/100 | B 64.4/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Ming-3.0-audio-flash | Qwen3-ASR-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | inclusionAI (Ant Group) | Alibaba (Qwen team) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-20 | 2026-07-22 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 2.3/5 (4) | 3.3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Ming-3.0-audio-flash
Ming-3.0-audio-flash is a cousin for Chinese and English transcription, questions about long audio and spoken replies in built-in or cloned voices, under MIT. It needs about 260 GB on a multi-GPU server, with inclusionAI's own runtime branches or Transformers remote code. The main risks are running repository code to load it and no published safety results.
Qwen3-ASR-1.7B
A small local transcription cousin for 30 languages and 22 Chinese dialects that identifies the language, takes context to get names right and streams through vLLM, under plain Apache 2.0. Its BF16 files need about 5 GB and run in released vLLM, SGLang, llama.cpp and Transformers. The main risk is upkeep, with no publisher replies or safety results.
Before you call either
Ming-3.0-audio-flash
- Start it with inclusionAI's recipe,
hf download inclusionAI/Ming-3.0-audio-flash --local-dir inclusionAI/Ming-3.0-audio-flash && export MODEL_PATH="$PWD/inclusionAI/Ming-3.0-audio-flash" && pip install -r requirements-vllm-omni.txt && MING_OUTPUT_MODE=asr ./scripts/serve_vllm_omni.sh "$MODEL_PATH", run from a clone of github.com/inclusionAI/Ming-3.0-audio-flash - The 128K profile uses tensor parallelism over eight 80 GB H800 GPUs, the SGLang profile four and SGLang-Omni's cookbook two. It doesn't fit the 107.4 GB reference machine
- Use
MING_OUTPUT_MODE=asrwith the validated prompt and greedy decoding for transcripts, and split the language label from the text at the tab - Use
MING_OUTPUT_MODE=textfor audio questions and the Talker profile withmodalities=["text", "audio"]for spoken replies - Send audio as a base64 data URL in an
audio_urlitem for vLLM-Omni, or asinput_audiofor SGLang - Pick a voice with
audio.voiceand an id, or clone one withref_audioand its exactprompt_text, never both - Turn thinking on per request with
chat_template_kwargs{"enable_thinking": true}, it's off by default and the reasoning comes back in think tags - Tool calls follow the template's
<tool_call>with<arg_key>and<arg_value>pairs, and no parser is named, so parse them yourself - Review the repository's Python and the talker/ code, .pyc files included, before loading with trust_remote_code
Qwen3-ASR-1.7B
- Start it with
vllm serve Qwen/Qwen3-ASR-1.7B(vLLM v0.32.0 or later), then POST the WAV to /v1/audio/transcriptions or send an audio_url part to /v1/chat/completions - Split chat-completions output with
parse_asr_outputfrom qwen-asr, since it returnslanguage <name><asr_text>before the transcript - For Transformers, load Qwen/Qwen3-ASR-1.7B-hf with Transformers 5.13.0 or later and use
processor.apply_transcription_request(audio, language=..., prompt=...), thendecode(..., return_format="transcription_only") - Put names and domain terms in the system message or
promptto bias the transcript, and force the language when you know it - For timestamps, use
pip install -U qwen-asrand passforced_aligner="Qwen/Qwen3-ForcedAligner-0.6B"withreturn_time_stamps=True - Use greedy decoding and raise max_new_tokens for long audio; the report gives single recordings up to 20 minutes
- Treat transcripts as untrusted text before passing them to another model, since speech can carry instructions
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Ming-3.0-audio-flash or Qwen3-ASR-1.7B?
Qwen3-ASR-1.7B scores 64.4 (B) on agent readiness against Ming-3.0-audio-flash's 42.5 (E), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. Ming-3.0-audio-flash leads on documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with Ming-3.0-audio-flash or Qwen3-ASR-1.7B
- Cohere Transcribe 03-2026 vs Ming-3.0-audio-flash
- Cohere Transcribe 03-2026 vs Qwen3-ASR-1.7B
- Ming-3.0-asr-tiny vs Ming-3.0-audio-flash
- Ming-3.0-asr-tiny vs Qwen3-ASR-1.7B
- Ming-3.0-audio-flash vs Ming-3.0-audio-tiny
- Ming-3.0-audio-flash vs Nemotron 3.5 ASR Streaming 0.6B
- Ming-3.0-audio-flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Ming-3.0-audio-flash vs Parakeet TDT 0.6B v3
- Ming-3.0-audio-flash vs Qwen3-ASR-0.6B
- Ming-3.0-audio-flash vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ming-3.0-audio-flash vs Underdog Bark 3.0
- Ming-3.0-audio-flash vs Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602
- Ming-3.0-audio-tiny vs Qwen3-ASR-1.7B
- Nemotron 3.5 ASR Streaming 0.6B vs Qwen3-ASR-1.7B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwen3-ASR-1.7B
- Parakeet TDT 0.6B v3 vs Qwen3-ASR-1.7B
- Qwen3-ASR-0.6B vs Qwen3-ASR-1.7B
- Qwen3-ASR-1.7B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3-ASR-1.7B vs Underdog Bark 3.0
- Qwen3-ASR-1.7B vs Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/ming-3-0-audio-flash-vs-qwen3-asr-1-7b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/ming-3-0-audio-flash.json·/api/v1/tools/qwen3-asr-1-7b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare ming-3-0-audio-flash qwen3-asr-1-7b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "ming-3-0-audio-flash", "b": "qwen3-asr-1-7b"}at/mcp, no key