Head to head · Speech-to-text · October 2026 research run
Nemotron 3.5 ASR Streaming 0.6B vs Qwen3-ASR-1.7B
Qwen3-ASR-1.7B scores 64.4 (B) on agent readiness against Nemotron 3.5 ASR Streaming 0.6B's 59.8 (C), and leads in 3 of 5 scored categories. Nemotron 3.5 ASR Streaming 0.6B leads on risk and documentation and upkeep. Both do speech-to-text.
Best speech-to-text APIs for AI agents · All 231 stt comparisons
Which one, for what
Nemotron 3.5 ASR Streaming 0.6B C
Best for Voice agents and call pipelines that need low-latency multilingual streaming transcription on a small GPU or a laptop
Ahead on
- Risk, 60 against 55
- Documentation and upkeep, 64 against 33
Watch for
Not in vLLM, SGLang, llama.cpp, Ollama or LM Studio; the GGUF needs NVIDIA's NeMo-Speech.cpp
Best for Agents that need local multilingual or Chinese-dialect transcription on a small GPU, served through vLLM
Ahead on
- Capability, 68 against 54
- Reach, 75 against 70
- Agent interface, 75 against 50
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.3 against 2.8 out of 5
Watch for
No quantised build from Alibaba, and nothing in Ollama's or LM Studio's library
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Nemotron 3.5 ASR Streaming 0.6B | Qwen3-ASR-1.7B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%35 | 54 | 68 | Qwen3-ASR-1.7B +14 |
| Reach | 25%25 | 70 | 75 | Qwen3-ASR-1.7B +5 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 60 | 55 | Nemotron 3.5 ASR Streaming 0.6B +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 50 | 75 | Qwen3-ASR-1.7B +25 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 64 | 33 | Nemotron 3.5 ASR Streaming 0.6B +31 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 59.8/100 | B 64.4/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Nemotron 3.5 ASR Streaming 0.6B | Qwen3-ASR-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | NVIDIA | Alibaba (Qwen team) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | OpenMDW-1.1 | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-09-10 | 2026-07-22 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 2.8/5 (4) | 3.3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Nemotron 3.5 ASR Streaming 0.6B
A small streaming transcription cousin for live audio in about 32 languages, with language detection and 80 ms to 1.12 s latency. It runs in under 8 GB in Transformers or as a 0.74 GB GGUF in NeMo-Speech.cpp, and several providers host it. The main gaps are no documented timestamps and weak accuracy outside the top 19 locales.
Qwen3-ASR-1.7B
A small local transcription cousin for 30 languages and 22 Chinese dialects that identifies the language, takes context to get names right and streams through vLLM, under plain Apache 2.0. Its BF16 files need about 5 GB and run in released vLLM, SGLang, llama.cpp and Transformers. The main risk is upkeep, with no publisher replies or safety results.
Before you call either
Nemotron 3.5 ASR Streaming 0.6B
- Quickest local run,
pip install "transformers>=5.13.0", thenpipeline("automatic-speech-recognition", model="nvidia/nemotron-3.5-asr-streaming-0.6b"); the pipeline uses en-US, so pass language= to the processor for anything else - With NeMo-Speech.cpp,
nemo-speech transcribe audio.wav --model nemotron-3.5-asr-streaming-0.6b.q8_0.gguf --language auto - Pass a locale such as de-DE or a bare code such as de, or auto; in auto mode decode with skip_special_tokens=False to keep the <xx-XX> tag, True to drop it
- Pick latency with att_context_size [56, r], r in 0, 1, 3, 6, 13 (80 to 1,120 ms chunks), or processor.set_num_lookahead_tokens in Transformers; bigger chunks are more accurate
- Use nvidia/nemotron-speech-streaming-en-0.6b instead for English only, as NVIDIA recommends
- Prefer model.safetensors or the GGUF over the .nemo file, which is a pickle
- Treat transcripts as untrusted text before passing them to another model, since speech can carry instructions
Qwen3-ASR-1.7B
- Start it with
vllm serve Qwen/Qwen3-ASR-1.7B(vLLM v0.32.0 or later), then POST the WAV to /v1/audio/transcriptions or send an audio_url part to /v1/chat/completions - Split chat-completions output with
parse_asr_outputfrom qwen-asr, since it returnslanguage <name><asr_text>before the transcript - For Transformers, load Qwen/Qwen3-ASR-1.7B-hf with Transformers 5.13.0 or later and use
processor.apply_transcription_request(audio, language=..., prompt=...), thendecode(..., return_format="transcription_only") - Put names and domain terms in the system message or
promptto bias the transcript, and force the language when you know it - For timestamps, use
pip install -U qwen-asrand passforced_aligner="Qwen/Qwen3-ForcedAligner-0.6B"withreturn_time_stamps=True - Use greedy decoding and raise max_new_tokens for long audio; the report gives single recordings up to 20 minutes
- Treat transcripts as untrusted text before passing them to another model, since speech can carry instructions
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Nemotron 3.5 ASR Streaming 0.6B or Qwen3-ASR-1.7B?
Qwen3-ASR-1.7B scores 64.4 (B) on agent readiness against Nemotron 3.5 ASR Streaming 0.6B's 59.8 (C), and leads in 3 of 5 scored categories. Nemotron 3.5 ASR Streaming 0.6B leads on risk and documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with Nemotron 3.5 ASR Streaming 0.6B or Qwen3-ASR-1.7B
- Cohere Transcribe 03-2026 vs Nemotron 3.5 ASR Streaming 0.6B
- Cohere Transcribe 03-2026 vs Qwen3-ASR-1.7B
- Ming-3.0-asr-tiny vs Nemotron 3.5 ASR Streaming 0.6B
- Ming-3.0-asr-tiny vs Qwen3-ASR-1.7B
- Ming-3.0-audio-flash vs Nemotron 3.5 ASR Streaming 0.6B
- Ming-3.0-audio-flash vs Qwen3-ASR-1.7B
- Ming-3.0-audio-tiny vs Nemotron 3.5 ASR Streaming 0.6B
- Ming-3.0-audio-tiny vs Qwen3-ASR-1.7B
- Nemotron 3.5 ASR Streaming 0.6B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Nemotron 3.5 ASR Streaming 0.6B vs Parakeet TDT 0.6B v3
- Nemotron 3.5 ASR Streaming 0.6B vs Qwen3-ASR-0.6B
- Nemotron 3.5 ASR Streaming 0.6B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3.5 ASR Streaming 0.6B vs Underdog Bark 3.0
- Nemotron 3.5 ASR Streaming 0.6B vs Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwen3-ASR-1.7B
- Parakeet TDT 0.6B v3 vs Qwen3-ASR-1.7B
- Qwen3-ASR-0.6B vs Qwen3-ASR-1.7B
- Qwen3-ASR-1.7B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3-ASR-1.7B vs Underdog Bark 3.0
- Qwen3-ASR-1.7B vs Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/nemotron-3-5-asr-streaming-0-6b-vs-qwen3-asr-1-7b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/nemotron-3-5-asr-streaming-0-6b.json·/api/v1/tools/qwen3-asr-1-7b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare nemotron-3-5-asr-streaming-0-6b qwen3-asr-1-7b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "nemotron-3-5-asr-streaming-0-6b", "b": "qwen3-asr-1-7b"}at/mcp, no key