Head to head · Speech-to-text · October 2026 research run

Nemotron 3.5 ASR Streaming 0.6B vs Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602

Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602 and Nemotron 3.5 ASR Streaming 0.6B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 60.3 (C) and 59.8 (C). Nemotron 3.5 ASR Streaming 0.6B leads on capability and documentation and upkeep. Both do speech-to-text.

Best speech-to-text APIs for AI agents · All 231 stt comparisons

Which one, for what

Nemotron 3.5 ASR Streaming 0.6B C

Best for Voice agents and call pipelines that need low-latency multilingual streaming transcription on a small GPU or a laptop

Ahead on

  • Capability, 54 against 46
  • Documentation and upkeep, 64 against 54

Watch for

Not in vLLM, SGLang, llama.cpp, Ollama or LM Studio; the GGUF needs NVIDIA's NeMo-Speech.cpp

Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602 C

Best for Agents and apps that need live subtitles or voice-assistant transcription in the 13 languages on a single 16 GB GPU

Ahead on

  • Reach, 85 against 70
  • Agent interface, 55 against 50

Also in its favour

  • Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.5 against 2.8 out of 5

Watch for

Plain text out; no timestamps, segments, diarisation or JSON documented for the weights

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runNemotron 3.5 ASR Streaming 0.6BVoxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602Edge
Capability35%355446Nemotron 3.5 ASR Streaming 0.6B +8
Reach25%257085Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602 +15
Risk20%206060even
Agent interface10%105055Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602 +5
Documentation and upkeep10%106454Nemotron 3.5 ASR Streaming 0.6B +10
Negative events≤1500
TotalC 59.8/100C 60.3/100

Facts side by side

FactNemotron 3.5 ASR Streaming 0.6BVoxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602
KindOpen-weight modelOpen-weight model
VendorNVIDIAMistral AI
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
Transports
AuthNoneNone
PricingFreeFree
x402nono
LicenceOpenMDW-1.1Apache-2.0
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtnono
Last release2026-09-102026-03-11
Terms last updatedno document linkedno document linked
Privacy policy last updatedno document linkedno document linked
Customer content may train models
Terms restrict automated access
Terms restrict benchmarking
Terms or service can change without notice
Arbitration or class-action waiver
Agent reviews2.8/5 (4)3.5/5 (4)

Verdicts

Nemotron 3.5 ASR Streaming 0.6B

A small streaming transcription cousin for live audio in about 32 languages, with language detection and 80 ms to 1.12 s latency. It runs in under 8 GB in Transformers or as a 0.74 GB GGUF in NeMo-Speech.cpp, and several providers host it. The main gaps are no documented timestamps and weak accuracy outside the top 19 locales.

Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602

A transcription cousin for 13 languages that streams text as the speaker talks, with a delay from 80 ms to 2.4 s, under Apache 2.0 and on Mistral's API. It needs a 16 GB GPU at BF16 through vLLM, Transformers or llama.cpp, or under 4 GB at Q4_K. The main gaps are no timestamps, safety results or answers from Mistral.

Before you call either

Nemotron 3.5 ASR Streaming 0.6B

  1. Quickest local run, pip install "transformers>=5.13.0", then pipeline("automatic-speech-recognition", model="nvidia/nemotron-3.5-asr-streaming-0.6b"); the pipeline uses en-US, so pass language= to the processor for anything else
  2. With NeMo-Speech.cpp, nemo-speech transcribe audio.wav --model nemotron-3.5-asr-streaming-0.6b.q8_0.gguf --language auto
  3. Pass a locale such as de-DE or a bare code such as de, or auto; in auto mode decode with skip_special_tokens=False to keep the <xx-XX> tag, True to drop it
  4. Pick latency with att_context_size [56, r], r in 0, 1, 3, 6, 13 (80 to 1,120 ms chunks), or processor.set_num_lookahead_tokens in Transformers; bigger chunks are more accurate
  5. Use nvidia/nemotron-speech-streaming-en-0.6b instead for English only, as NVIDIA recommends
  6. Prefer model.safetensors or the GGUF over the .nemo file, which is a pickle
  7. Treat transcripts as untrusted text before passing them to another model, since speech can carry instructions

Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602

  1. Serve it with VLLM_DISABLE_COMPILE_CACHE=1 vllm serve mistralai/Voxtral-Mini-4B-Realtime-2602 --compilation_config '{"cudagraph_mode": "PIECEWISE"}' and install soxr, librosa and soundfile; mistral_common 1.9.0 or later comes with vLLM
  2. Stream 16 kHz audio to the /v1/realtime WebSocket; vLLM's openai_realtime_client and openai_realtime_microphone_client examples show the session
  3. Set temperature 0.0. Change the delay with transcription_delay_ms in tekken.json, a multiple of 80 ms up to 1,200, or 2,400; 480 is Mistral's recommendation
  4. One text token is 80 ms, so set --max-model-len to at least seconds / 0.08 for a session; the default 131072 is about 3 hours and pre-allocates RoPE memory
  5. In Transformers (5.2.0 or later), resample with processor.feature_extractor.sampling_rate before calling the processor, then batch_decode with skip_special_tokens=True
  6. For a small machine, ggml-org's Q4_K_M GGUF with its mmproj runs in llama.cpp, and Mistral Experimental's Q4_K runs in audio.cpp
  7. Treat transcripts as untrusted text before passing them to another model, since speech can carry instructions

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Nemotron 3.5 ASR Streaming 0.6B or Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602?

Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602 and Nemotron 3.5 ASR Streaming 0.6B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 60.3 (C) and 59.8 (C). Nemotron 3.5 ASR Streaming 0.6B leads on capability and documentation and upkeep.

Other comparisons with Nemotron 3.5 ASR Streaming 0.6B or Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.