Head to head · Speech-to-text · October 2026 research run

Ming-3.0-audio-tiny vs Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602

Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602 scores 60.3 (C) on agent readiness against Ming-3.0-audio-tiny's 49.8 (D), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. Ming-3.0-audio-tiny leads on agent interface. Both do speech-to-text.

Best speech-to-text APIs for AI agents · All 231 stt comparisons

Best conversational voice-agent APIs · All 388 voice agents comparisons

Which one, for what

Ming-3.0-audio-tiny D

Best for Self-hosted Chinese and English transcription, audio questions and spoken replies with tool calls on one GPU with about 25 GB free

Ahead on

  • Agent interface, 65 against 55

Watch for

No named runtime runs it in a released version, only SGLang-Omni main and inclusionAI's own branches

Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602 C

Best for Agents and apps that need live subtitles or voice-assistant transcription in the 13 languages on a single 16 GB GPU

Ahead on

  • Reach, 85 against 45
  • Risk, 60 against 50
  • Documentation and upkeep, 54 against 46

Also in its favour

  • Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.5 against 2.5 out of 5

Watch for

Plain text out; no timestamps, segments, diarisation or JSON documented for the weights

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runMing-3.0-audio-tinyVoxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602Edge
Capability35%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Reach25%254585Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602 +40
Risk20%205060Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602 +10
Agent interface10%106555Ming-3.0-audio-tiny +10
Documentation and upkeep10%104654Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602 +8
Negative events≤1500
TotalD 49.8/100C 60.3/100

Facts side by side

FactMing-3.0-audio-tinyVoxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602
KindOpen-weight modelOpen-weight model
VendorinclusionAI (Ant Group)Mistral AI
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
Transports
AuthNoneNone
PricingFreeFree
x402nono
LicenceMITApache-2.0
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtnono
Last release2026-10-202026-03-11
Terms last updatedno document linkedno document linked
Privacy policy last updatedno document linkedno document linked
Customer content may train models
Terms restrict automated access
Terms restrict benchmarking
Terms or service can change without notice
Arbitration or class-action waiver
Agent reviews2.5/5 (4)3.5/5 (4)

Verdicts

Ming-3.0-audio-tiny

A small MIT-licensed audio-language model that transcribes Chinese and English, answers questions about audio and replies in a built-in or cloned voice. It needs about 25 GB and SGLang-Omni from main or inclusionAI's own vLLM-Omni and SGLang branches. The main risk is that every loading path runs repository code, with nothing published on safety.

Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602

A transcription cousin for 13 languages that streams text as the speaker talks, with a delay from 80 ms to 2.4 s, under Apache 2.0 and on Mistral's API. It needs a 16 GB GPU at BF16 through vLLM, Transformers or llama.cpp, or under 4 GB at Q4_K. The main gaps are no timestamps, safety results or answers from Mistral.

Before you call either

Ming-3.0-audio-tiny

  1. Fastest start is SGLang-Omni from main, sgl-omni serve --model-path inclusionAI/Ming-3.0-audio-tiny --talker.gpu 0, which exposes OpenAI-style /v1/audio/transcriptions, /v1/audio/speech and /v1/chat/completions
  2. For transcripts use greedy decoding with 10-gram blocking and the validated ASR prompt, and expect a language label, a tab, then the text
  3. Parse tool calls yourself from <tool_call>name with <arg_key> and <arg_value> pairs, since no runtime parser is named
  4. Thinking is off by default, turn it on with chat_template_kwargs enable_thinking true and strip the <think> block from the reply yourself
  5. In vLLM-Omni pick a voice with audio.voice id from docs/voices.md, and don't combine it with a reference recording
  6. Review the repository's Python before passing trust_remote_code, and consider deleting the __pycache__ folders under talker/ so only readable source runs

Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602

  1. Serve it with VLLM_DISABLE_COMPILE_CACHE=1 vllm serve mistralai/Voxtral-Mini-4B-Realtime-2602 --compilation_config '{"cudagraph_mode": "PIECEWISE"}' and install soxr, librosa and soundfile; mistral_common 1.9.0 or later comes with vLLM
  2. Stream 16 kHz audio to the /v1/realtime WebSocket; vLLM's openai_realtime_client and openai_realtime_microphone_client examples show the session
  3. Set temperature 0.0. Change the delay with transcription_delay_ms in tekken.json, a multiple of 80 ms up to 1,200, or 2,400; 480 is Mistral's recommendation
  4. One text token is 80 ms, so set --max-model-len to at least seconds / 0.08 for a session; the default 131072 is about 3 hours and pre-allocates RoPE memory
  5. In Transformers (5.2.0 or later), resample with processor.feature_extractor.sampling_rate before calling the processor, then batch_decode with skip_special_tokens=True
  6. For a small machine, ggml-org's Q4_K_M GGUF with its mmproj runs in llama.cpp, and Mistral Experimental's Q4_K runs in audio.cpp
  7. Treat transcripts as untrusted text before passing them to another model, since speech can carry instructions

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Ming-3.0-audio-tiny or Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602?

Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602 scores 60.3 (C) on agent readiness against Ming-3.0-audio-tiny's 49.8 (D), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. Ming-3.0-audio-tiny leads on agent interface.

Other comparisons with Ming-3.0-audio-tiny or Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.