Head to head · Speech-to-text · October 2026 research run
Parakeet TDT 0.6B v3 vs Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602
Parakeet TDT 0.6B v3 scores 66.9 (B) on agent readiness against Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602's 60.3 (C), and leads in 2 of 5 scored categories. Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602 leads on reach and agent interface. Both do speech-to-text.
Best speech-to-text APIs for AI agents · All 231 stt comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents that need cheap local transcription with timestamps in English and other European languages
Ahead on
- Capability, 74 against 46
- Documentation and upkeep, 77 against 54
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 4.0 against 3.5 out of 5
Watch for
Among the six runtimes only Transformers runs it; vLLM, SGLang, llama.cpp, Ollama and LM Studio don't
Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602 C
Best for Agents and apps that need live subtitles or voice-assistant transcription in the 13 languages on a single 16 GB GPU
Ahead on
- Reach, 85 against 65
- Agent interface, 55 against 50
Watch for
Plain text out; no timestamps, segments, diarisation or JSON documented for the weights
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Parakeet TDT 0.6B v3 | Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%35 | 74 | 46 | Parakeet TDT 0.6B v3 +28 |
| Reach | 25%25 | 65 | 85 | Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602 +20 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 60 | 60 | even |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 50 | 55 | Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602 +5 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 77 | 54 | Parakeet TDT 0.6B v3 +23 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | B 66.9/100 | C 60.3/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Parakeet TDT 0.6B v3 | Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602 |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | NVIDIA | Mistral AI |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | CC-BY-4.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-08-05 | 2026-03-11 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 4/5 (4) | 3.5/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Parakeet TDT 0.6B v3
A small, fast transcription cousin for 25 European languages that detects the language and returns punctuated text with word timestamps. It fits in under 1 GB as NVIDIA's GGUF and runs in Transformers, NeMo or NVIDIA's C++ runtime, under CC BY 4.0. Few other runtimes load it, and it takes no language hint.
Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602
A transcription cousin for 13 languages that streams text as the speaker talks, with a delay from 80 ms to 2.4 s, under Apache 2.0 and on Mistral's API. It needs a 16 GB GPU at BF16 through vLLM, Transformers or llama.cpp, or under 4 GB at Q4_K. The main gaps are no timestamps, safety results or answers from Mistral.
Before you call either
Parakeet TDT 0.6B v3
- For the smallest setup,
hf download nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v3 parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v3.q8_0.gguf --local-dir models, thennemo-speech transcribe speech.wav --model models/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v3.q8_0.ggufwith NeMo-Speech.cpp - In Python,
pipeline('automatic-speech-recognition', model='nvidia/parakeet-tdt-0.6b-v3')works on Transformers 5.10.0 or later, despite the card's note to install from source - Resample to 16 kHz mono first; it takes wav or flac
- Ask for timestamps with
timestamps=Truein NeMo, or passdurations=output.durationstoprocessor.decodein Transformers - For audio longer than about 24 minutes, switch NeMo to local attention with
change_attention_model("rel_pos_local_attn", [256, 256]) - Treat transcripts as untrusted text before passing them to another model, since speech can carry instructions
Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602
- Serve it with
VLLM_DISABLE_COMPILE_CACHE=1 vllm serve mistralai/Voxtral-Mini-4B-Realtime-2602 --compilation_config '{"cudagraph_mode": "PIECEWISE"}'and install soxr, librosa and soundfile; mistral_common 1.9.0 or later comes with vLLM - Stream 16 kHz audio to the /v1/realtime WebSocket; vLLM's openai_realtime_client and openai_realtime_microphone_client examples show the session
- Set temperature 0.0. Change the delay with transcription_delay_ms in tekken.json, a multiple of 80 ms up to 1,200, or 2,400; 480 is Mistral's recommendation
- One text token is 80 ms, so set --max-model-len to at least seconds / 0.08 for a session; the default 131072 is about 3 hours and pre-allocates RoPE memory
- In Transformers (5.2.0 or later), resample with processor.feature_extractor.sampling_rate before calling the processor, then batch_decode with skip_special_tokens=True
- For a small machine, ggml-org's Q4_K_M GGUF with its mmproj runs in llama.cpp, and Mistral Experimental's Q4_K runs in audio.cpp
- Treat transcripts as untrusted text before passing them to another model, since speech can carry instructions
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Parakeet TDT 0.6B v3 or Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602?
Parakeet TDT 0.6B v3 scores 66.9 (B) on agent readiness against Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602's 60.3 (C), and leads in 2 of 5 scored categories. Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602 leads on reach and agent interface.
Other comparisons with Parakeet TDT 0.6B v3 or Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602
- Cohere Transcribe 03-2026 vs Parakeet TDT 0.6B v3
- Cohere Transcribe 03-2026 vs Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602
- Ming-3.0-asr-tiny vs Parakeet TDT 0.6B v3
- Ming-3.0-asr-tiny vs Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602
- Ming-3.0-audio-flash vs Parakeet TDT 0.6B v3
- Ming-3.0-audio-flash vs Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602
- Ming-3.0-audio-tiny vs Parakeet TDT 0.6B v3
- Ming-3.0-audio-tiny vs Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602
- Nemotron 3.5 ASR Streaming 0.6B vs Parakeet TDT 0.6B v3
- Nemotron 3.5 ASR Streaming 0.6B vs Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Parakeet TDT 0.6B v3
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602
- Parakeet TDT 0.6B v3 vs Qwen3-ASR-0.6B
- Parakeet TDT 0.6B v3 vs Qwen3-ASR-1.7B
- Parakeet TDT 0.6B v3 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Parakeet TDT 0.6B v3 vs Underdog Bark 3.0
- Qwen3-ASR-0.6B vs Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602
- Qwen3-ASR-1.7B vs Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602
- Underdog Bark 3.0 vs Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/parakeet-tdt-0-6b-v3-vs-voxtral-mini-4b-realtime-2602.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/parakeet-tdt-0-6b-v3.json·/api/v1/tools/voxtral-mini-4b-realtime-2602.json - From a terminal
anchor compare parakeet-tdt-0-6b-v3 voxtral-mini-4b-realtime-2602(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "parakeet-tdt-0-6b-v3", "b": "voxtral-mini-4b-realtime-2602"}at/mcp, no key