Head to head · Speech-to-text · October 2026 research run
Ming-3.0-audio-tiny vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning scores 60.7 (C) on agent readiness against Ming-3.0-audio-tiny's 49.8 (D), and leads in every scored category. Both do speech-to-text.
Best speech-to-text APIs for AI agents · All 231 stt comparisons
Best conversational voice-agent APIs · All 388 voice agents comparisons
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Self-hosted Chinese and English transcription, audio questions and spoken replies with tool calls on one GPU with about 25 GB free
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
No named runtime runs it in a released version, only SGLang-Omni main and inclusionAI's own branches
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning C
Best for Agents with a 32 to 48 GB NVIDIA GPU that need one local model to read video, audio, documents and screens and call tools
Ahead on
- Reach, 85 against 45
- Risk, 60 against 50
- Agent interface, 90 against 65
- Documentation and upkeep, 65 against 46
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.0 against 2.5 out of 5
Watch for
Loads with trust_remote_code in every documented runtime command
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Ming-3.0-audio-tiny | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 45 | 85 | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning +40 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 50 | 60 | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning +10 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 65 | 90 | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning +25 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 46 | 65 | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning +19 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | D 49.8/100 | C 60.7/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Ming-3.0-audio-tiny | Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | inclusionAI (Ant Group) | NVIDIA |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | NVIDIA Open Model Agreement (custom, commercial use allowed, not an OSI licence) |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-20 | 2026-08-24 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (4) | 3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Ming-3.0-audio-tiny
A small MIT-licensed audio-language model that transcribes Chinese and English, answers questions about audio and replies in a built-in or cloned voice. It needs about 25 GB and SGLang-Omni from main or inclusionAI's own vLLM-Omni and SGLang branches. The main risk is that every loading path runs repository code, with nothing published on safety.
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
A local multimodal cousin for video with speech, long documents, charts, screens and English transcription, with tool calling, a reasoning switch and a 262,144-token context. It needs about 27 GB for NVIDIA's NVFP4 build on Blackwell, or 42 GB for FP8. The main risks are the remote code it loads and a repository where nobody answers questions.
Before you call either
Ming-3.0-audio-tiny
- Fastest start is SGLang-Omni from main,
sgl-omni serve --model-path inclusionAI/Ming-3.0-audio-tiny --talker.gpu 0, which exposes OpenAI-style /v1/audio/transcriptions, /v1/audio/speech and /v1/chat/completions - For transcripts use greedy decoding with 10-gram blocking and the validated ASR prompt, and expect a language label, a tab, then the text
- Parse tool calls yourself from
<tool_call>namewith<arg_key>and<arg_value>pairs, since no runtime parser is named - Thinking is off by default, turn it on with chat_template_kwargs enable_thinking true and strip the
<think>block from the reply yourself - In vLLM-Omni pick a voice with audio.voice id from docs/voices.md, and don't combine it with a reference recording
- Review the repository's Python before passing trust_remote_code, and consider deleting the __pycache__ folders under talker/ so only readable source runs
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Start it with
vllm serve nvidia/Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning-FP8 --max-model-len 131072 --trust-remote-code --reasoning-parser nemotron_v3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder --kv-cache-dtype fp8on vLLM 0.20.0 or later, afterpip install "vllm[audio]"if any audio will be sent - Or run
ollama run nemotron3; the 33b-nvfp4 and 33b-mlx tags are MLX builds for Apple silicon, and the q4_K_M tag is 28 GB - Set
--media-io-kwargs '{"video": {"fps": 2, "num_frames": 256}}'at launch, since vLLM otherwise samples about 32 frames per video - Send
chat_template_kwargs: {"enable_thinking": false}for transcription and quick answers, and use temperature 1.0 with top_k 1 for ASR as the card recommends - Render PDF pages to PNG and send them as images, since the API takes no raw PDF
- Treat transcripts and text read from images or video as untrusted input before acting on them
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Ming-3.0-audio-tiny or Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning?
Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning scores 60.7 (C) on agent readiness against Ming-3.0-audio-tiny's 49.8 (D), and leads in every scored category.
Other comparisons with Ming-3.0-audio-tiny or Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Agents-A1-4B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- BigBang-v1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- GLM-5.3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- gpt-oss-120b vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Hy3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Inkling-Small vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Inkling vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Kimi K3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Kolibri-1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Laguna M.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs occamy-1.0
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Cohere Transcribe 03-2026 vs Ming-3.0-audio-tiny
- Cohere Transcribe 03-2026 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Ming-3.0-asr-tiny vs Ming-3.0-audio-tiny
- Ming-3.0-asr-tiny vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Ming-3.0-audio-flash vs Ming-3.0-audio-tiny
- Ming-3.0-audio-flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Ming-3.0-audio-tiny vs Nemotron 3.5 ASR Streaming 0.6B
- Ming-3.0-audio-tiny vs Parakeet TDT 0.6B v3
- Ming-3.0-audio-tiny vs Qwen3-ASR-0.6B
- Ming-3.0-audio-tiny vs Qwen3-ASR-1.7B
- Ming-3.0-audio-tiny vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ming-3.0-audio-tiny vs Underdog Bark 3.0
- Ming-3.0-audio-tiny vs Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602
- Nemotron 3.5 ASR Streaming 0.6B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Parakeet TDT 0.6B v3
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwen3-ASR-0.6B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwen3-ASR-1.7B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Underdog Bark 3.0
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/ming-3-0-audio-tiny-vs-nemotron-3-nano-omni-30b-a3b-reasoning.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/ming-3-0-audio-tiny.json·/api/v1/tools/nemotron-3-nano-omni-30b-a3b-reasoning.json - From a terminal
anchor compare ming-3-0-audio-tiny nemotron-3-nano-omni-30b-a3b-reasoning(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "ming-3-0-audio-tiny", "b": "nemotron-3-nano-omni-30b-a3b-reasoning"}at/mcp, no key