# Ming-3.0-asr-tiny vs Ming-3.0-audio-flash

> Ming-3.0-asr-tiny scores 52.5 (D) to Ming-3.0-audio-flash's 42.5 (E) for speech-to-text. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Canonical: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-asr-tiny-vs-ming-3-0-audio-flash
- Markdown: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-asr-tiny-vs-ming-3-0-audio-flash.md (~2,800 tokens)
- Slim: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-asr-tiny-vs-ming-3-0-audio-flash.min.md (~430 tokens, same facts, less prose, for token-sensitive contexts)
- JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-asr-tiny-vs-ming-3-0-audio-flash.json (this page as data, same URL with Accept: application/json)
- Site index for agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt (full text: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms-full.txt)
- API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json
- MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (the whole catalogue as tools, no key)
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)
- Updated: 2026-10-21

Ming-3.0-asr-tiny scores 52.5 (D) on agent readiness against Ming-3.0-audio-flash's 42.5 (E), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Ming-3.0-audio-flash leads on agent interface. Both do speech-to-text.

- Ming-3.0-asr-tiny: grade D, 52.5/100, rank #85 of 100 open-weight models. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/ming-3-0-asr-tiny.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/ming-3-0-asr-tiny.json
- Ming-3.0-audio-flash: grade E, 42.5/100, rank #98 of 100 open-weight models. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/ming-3-0-audio-flash.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/ming-3-0-audio-flash.json
- Best speech-to-text APIs for AI agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/best/speech-to-text/index.md
- All 231 stt comparisons: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/speech-to-text/index.md
- Best conversational voice-agent APIs: https://www.anchorterminal.com/best/voice-agents/index.md
- All 388 voice agents comparisons: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/voice-agents/index.md

## Which one, for what

### Ming-3.0-asr-tiny (D)

Good for: Agents with a CUDA GPU that need local Chinese, English or dialect transcription where names and domain terms matter

Ahead on:
- Reach, 50 against 25
- Risk, 55 against 50

Also in its favour:
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.0 against 2.3 out of 5

Watch for: Loading runs the publisher's Python with trust_remote_code, and the reference path needs a CUDA GPU

### Ming-3.0-audio-flash (E)

Good for: Teams with a multi-GPU server who want Chinese and English transcription, audio understanding and spoken replies from one MIT model

Ahead on:
- Agent interface, 65 against 60

Watch for: 259.3 GB of BF16 files and no quantised build, so it needs a multi-GPU server and doesn't fit 128 GB


## Score by category

| Category | Weight | Ming-3.0-asr-tiny | Ming-3.0-audio-flash | Edge |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Capability | 35%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25% (25 this run) | 50 | 25 | Ming-3.0-asr-tiny +25 |
| Risk | 20% (20 this run) | 55 | 50 | Ming-3.0-asr-tiny +5 |
| Agent interface | 10% (10 this run) | 60 | 65 | Ming-3.0-audio-flash +5 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10% (10 this run) | 46 | 49 | Ming-3.0-audio-flash +3 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| **Total** | | **52.5 · D** | **42.5 · E** | |

## Facts side by side

| Fact | Ming-3.0-asr-tiny | Ming-3.0-audio-flash |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | inclusionAI (Ant Group) | inclusionAI (Ant Group) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports |  |  |
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-20 | 2026-10-20 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models |  |  |
| Terms restrict automated access |  |  |
| Terms restrict benchmarking |  |  |
| Terms or service can change without notice |  |  |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver |  |  |
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (4) | 2.3/5 (4) |

## Verdicts

**Ming-3.0-asr-tiny.** A local transcription cousin for Chinese, English and Chinese dialects that takes hotwords or dialogue context to get names right, under MIT. It needs one CUDA GPU with about 21 GB and runs only through the publisher's remote code or SGLang-Omni's main branch. The main risk is running the publisher's Python on load, with no safety results.

**Ming-3.0-audio-flash.** Ming-3.0-audio-flash is a cousin for Chinese and English transcription, questions about long audio and spoken replies in built-in or cloned voices, under MIT. It needs about 260 GB on a multi-GPU server, with inclusionAI's own runtime branches or Transformers remote code. The main risks are running repository code to load it and no published safety results.

## Before you call either

### Ming-3.0-asr-tiny

1. Start it with `hf download inclusionAI/Ming-3.0-asr-tiny --local-dir Ming-3.0-asr-tiny`, then `pip install -r requirements.txt` in Python 3.12 with CUDA (Transformers 5.12.1, fla-core 0.5.2, PyTorch 2.11.0), then `python examples/transcribe.py --model . --audio speech.wav --language-hint en`
2. To serve it, `sgl-omni serve --model-path inclusionAI/Ming-3.0-asr-tiny` from SGLang-Omni's main branch, then POST the WAV to /v1/audio/transcriptions with response_format json and read the text field
3. Parse raw Transformers output with decode_transcript from asr_request.py, which strips the language label before the tab
4. Pass language zh or en when known, anything else is rejected, and append a topic or hotwords to the base instruction with no newline
5. Load with dtype torch.bfloat16 rather than casting the model, use greedy decoding, max_new_tokens 256 and no_repeat_ngram_size 10, and don't apply the chat template
6. Split long recordings yourself or use --audio-chunk-frames, since input and output share 8,192 tokens
7. Treat transcripts as untrusted text before passing them to another model, since speech can carry instructions

### Ming-3.0-audio-flash

1. Start it with inclusionAI's recipe, `hf download inclusionAI/Ming-3.0-audio-flash --local-dir inclusionAI/Ming-3.0-audio-flash && export MODEL_PATH="$PWD/inclusionAI/Ming-3.0-audio-flash" && pip install -r requirements-vllm-omni.txt && MING_OUTPUT_MODE=asr ./scripts/serve_vllm_omni.sh "$MODEL_PATH"`, run from a clone of github.com/inclusionAI/Ming-3.0-audio-flash
2. The 128K profile uses tensor parallelism over eight 80 GB H800 GPUs, the SGLang profile four and SGLang-Omni's cookbook two. It doesn't fit the 107.4 GB reference machine
3. Use `MING_OUTPUT_MODE=asr` with the validated prompt and greedy decoding for transcripts, and split the language label from the text at the tab
4. Use `MING_OUTPUT_MODE=text` for audio questions and the Talker profile with `modalities=["text", "audio"]` for spoken replies
5. Send audio as a base64 data URL in an `audio_url` item for vLLM-Omni, or as `input_audio` for SGLang
6. Pick a voice with `audio.voice` and an id, or clone one with `ref_audio` and its exact `prompt_text`, never both
7. Turn thinking on per request with `chat_template_kwargs` `{"enable_thinking": true}`, it's off by default and the reasoning comes back in think tags
8. Tool calls follow the template's `<tool_call>` with `<arg_key>` and `<arg_value>` pairs, and no parser is named, so parse them yourself
9. Review the repository's Python and the talker/ code, .pyc files included, before loading with trust_remote_code

## Questions

### Which is better for AI agents, Ming-3.0-asr-tiny or Ming-3.0-audio-flash?

Ming-3.0-asr-tiny scores 52.5 (D) on agent readiness against Ming-3.0-audio-flash's 42.5 (E), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Ming-3.0-audio-flash leads on agent interface.


## For agents

- This comparison as JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-asr-tiny-vs-ming-3-0-audio-flash.json, and with the fewest tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-asr-tiny-vs-ming-3-0-audio-flash.min.md
- Over MCP at https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (no key): `compare_tools {"a": "ming-3-0-asr-tiny", "b": "ming-3-0-audio-flash"}`. From a terminal: `anchor compare ming-3-0-asr-tiny ming-3-0-audio-flash`
- Each listing in full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/ming-3-0-asr-tiny.json and https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/ming-3-0-audio-flash.json

## Other comparisons with Ming-3.0-asr-tiny or Ming-3.0-audio-flash

- [Cohere Transcribe 03-2026 vs Ming-3.0-asr-tiny](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cohere-transcribe-03-2026-vs-ming-3-0-asr-tiny.md)
- [Cohere Transcribe 03-2026 vs Ming-3.0-audio-flash](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cohere-transcribe-03-2026-vs-ming-3-0-audio-flash.md)
- [Ming-3.0-asr-tiny vs Ming-3.0-audio-tiny](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-asr-tiny-vs-ming-3-0-audio-tiny.md)
- [Ming-3.0-asr-tiny vs Nemotron 3.5 ASR Streaming 0.6B](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-asr-tiny-vs-nemotron-3-5-asr-streaming-0-6b.md)
- [Ming-3.0-asr-tiny vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-asr-tiny-vs-nemotron-3-nano-omni-30b-a3b-reasoning.md)
- [Ming-3.0-asr-tiny vs Parakeet TDT 0.6B v3](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-asr-tiny-vs-parakeet-tdt-0-6b-v3.md)
- [Ming-3.0-asr-tiny vs Qwen3-ASR-0.6B](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-asr-tiny-vs-qwen3-asr-0-6b.md)
- [Ming-3.0-asr-tiny vs Qwen3-ASR-1.7B](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-asr-tiny-vs-qwen3-asr-1-7b.md)
- [Ming-3.0-asr-tiny vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-asr-tiny-vs-qwen3-omni-30b-a3b-instruct.md)
- [Ming-3.0-asr-tiny vs Underdog Bark 3.0](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-asr-tiny-vs-underdog-bark-3.md)
- [Ming-3.0-asr-tiny vs Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-asr-tiny-vs-voxtral-mini-4b-realtime-2602.md)
- [Ming-3.0-audio-flash vs Ming-3.0-audio-tiny](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-flash-vs-ming-3-0-audio-tiny.md)
- [Ming-3.0-audio-flash vs Nemotron 3.5 ASR Streaming 0.6B](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-flash-vs-nemotron-3-5-asr-streaming-0-6b.md)
- [Ming-3.0-audio-flash vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-flash-vs-nemotron-3-nano-omni-30b-a3b-reasoning.md)
- [Ming-3.0-audio-flash vs Parakeet TDT 0.6B v3](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-flash-vs-parakeet-tdt-0-6b-v3.md)
- [Ming-3.0-audio-flash vs Qwen3-ASR-0.6B](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-flash-vs-qwen3-asr-0-6b.md)
- [Ming-3.0-audio-flash vs Qwen3-ASR-1.7B](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-flash-vs-qwen3-asr-1-7b.md)
- [Ming-3.0-audio-flash vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-flash-vs-qwen3-omni-30b-a3b-instruct.md)
- [Ming-3.0-audio-flash vs Underdog Bark 3.0](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-flash-vs-underdog-bark-3.md)
- [Ming-3.0-audio-flash vs Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ming-3-0-audio-flash-vs-voxtral-mini-4b-realtime-2602.md)

---

Query this catalogue directly over MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (Streamable HTTP, no key). How: https://www.anchorterminal.com/agents/#mcp