Sign in

Mistral Large 4

by Mistral AI Open-weight model in Open-weight models

Mistral AI · mistral.ai since 2019 · who's behind it

Mistral Large 4 ("Le Chonk") is Mistral AI's open-weight mixture-of-experts model of about 1T parameters with 52B active, taking text and images, with three reasoning efforts and a 1M-token context, published in FP8 and NVFP4.

Best for Operators with an 8-GPU Blackwell or H200 node who want a frontier-sized open model for coding agents and defensive security, with a hosted twin on Mistral's API.

Write a review Compare Follow changes

Viewed under 500 times in the last 30 days · See the full traffic report

Claim this listing

Is this your product? Claim it to see how agents find it: lookups through the API, MCP and letme, the comparisons it's in, and what people search for in Open weights. Free, and it never changes the grade. Or verify it, or log in if it's already claimed.

More from Mistral AI Mistral Embed and Codestral Embed (Embeddings) · Mistral Moderation API (Guardrails) · Mistral Voxtral Transcribe (STT) · Voxtral Mini 4B Realtime 2602 (STT) · Mistral OCR API (Documents) · Mistral Vibe CLI (Harnesses)

The same model, listed separately Mistral AI API (Model API)

Trained by Mistral AI, in the Mistral Large 4 family all its cousins, older versions

Assessment. A frontier-sized open cousin for coding agents and defensive security, with strict JSON Schema output, parallel tool calls and three reasoning efforts. It needs a multi-GPU server, about 732 GB for the smallest 4-bit build, and vLLM and SGLang run it only from special images. The main risk is a licence that bars Model-as-a-Service businesses without a separate deal.

Facts

Access how an agent reaches and pays for it
Auth
None
Pricing
Free · Free
x402
No
Licence
Mistral Ecosystem Open-Weight License (modified MIT)
Capabilities
model.open-weights
Where it lives packages, source, docs and releases
Packages
huggingface mistralai/Mistral-Large-4-1T-A52B
huggingface mistralai/Mistral-Large-4-1T-A52B-NVFP4
llms.txt
not found
Last release
From our research 10 facts checked against the vendor's pages
Surface graded
The open weights at huggingface.co/mistralai/Mistral-Large-4-1T-A52B (FP8) and Mistral-Large-4-1T-A52B-NVFP4, read from the model cards, the files and their metadata, the chat template, the licence, Mistral's announcements and docs, and the runtimes' own code on 30 October 2026. Nothing was downloaded or run. The hosted model is the mistral-api listing
Model
A granular mixture of experts, 72 layers with 128 routed experts (4 active per token) and 1 shared, a dense first layer, multi-head latent attention with a sparse attention indexer, and a Pixtral-style vision encoder of 1.6B. About 1T parameters in all (1.05T in Mistral's docs) and 49B active per token, 52B with embeddings and output layers. Text and images in, text out. An embedded DSpark draft head of 3 dense layers proposes 3 tokens at a time for speculative decoding
Files
54 safetensors shards in block-scaled FP8 (1,060.6 GB) and 32 in the NVFP4 repository (610.0 GB, NVFP4 experts with FP8 linears), each with chat_template.jinja, params.json, tekken.json and tokenizer.json. No pickle and no Python files. Hugging Face lists a SHA-256 for every shard. No BF16 repository
Licence
Mistral Ecosystem Open-Weight License, a modified MIT licence. Use, modification, distribution and commercial use are free, except that a licensee whose group operates a Model-as-a-Service business (giving third parties inference or post-training access with meaningful control over inputs, parameters or training data) must take a separate commercial licence before any commercial use. Internal use and use through Mistral's own products are exempt. The card adds a line forbidding use that violates third parties' rights
Runtimes
Model code in released Transformers (mistral_large4 in v5.22.0) and llama.cpp (LLM_ARCH_MISTRAL_LARGE4 at release b12017), with GGUFs from ggml-org. vLLM and SGLang serve it only from Docker images tagged mistral-large-4; no release of either has the model. Ollama lists it as a cloud model only, and LM Studio has no entry
Context
1,048,576 tokens in config.json, reached with YaRN (factor 2048 over an original 512 positions) and NoPE on every fourth layer. Mistral says the checkpoint supports a 1M window and doesn't say what length it was trained at
Tools and reasoning
The template declares tools in [AVAILABLE_TOOLS] and renders calls as [TOOL_CALLS]name[ARGS]arguments, several per turn, with results in [TOOL_RESULTS]. The card names vLLM's mistral tool and reasoning parsers and SGLang's auto parsers, and shows OpenAI-style tool calls and strict JSON Schema output through response_format, which the template passes to the model in [MODEL_SETTINGS]. reasoning_effort is low, medium or high (default) per request and can't be turned off; the reasoning comes back in message.reasoning
Hardware
The card's commands use 8 GPUs with tensor parallelism and says NVFP4 targets Blackwell GPUs. vLLM's recipe validates GB300, B300, B200 and H200 (FP8 at about 128 GiB of weights per GPU on 8 GPUs, NVFP4 about 76 GiB) and AMD MI350X. Nothing fits a 128 GB machine; the smallest 4-bit build needs about 732 GB
Recommended settings
temperature 1.0 and top_p 0.95 at every effort, high effort for agentic use and complex prompts, low for quick replies, a system prompt that sets the environment, and as few tools as the task needs, per the card
Training data
Not described on the card. Mistral's preview post says it was trained from scratch on 3,800 Grace Blackwell GPUs in Mistral's own European datacentres, that a significant share of the data spans more than 160 languages, and that post-training used SFT and reinforcement learning in the same environments Mistral Forge sells to customers. No sources, sizes or cut-off. A technical report is described as coming soon

Facts verified 30 October 2026 from vendor docs, repositories and package registries. JSON · Markdown

Strengths

  • Safetensors only, loaded by Transformers' own code with a Jinja template, in Mistral's verified organisation with a hash on every file
  • Tool calling documented end to end with a named parser, several calls a turn and strict JSON Schema output
  • Reasoning effort budgeted per request, low, medium or high, with the reasoning returned apart from the answer
  • FP8 and NVFP4 builds from Mistral, and Mistral's own API serves the same model for agents without the hardware
  • First among open-weight models on Cognition's FrontierCode 2.0 leaderboard, run in Mistral's own harness

Weaknesses

  • The smallest 4-bit build needs about 732 GB, so nothing fits a single workstation or a 128 GB machine
  • No vLLM or SGLang release supports it yet, only Docker images tagged mistral-large-4
  • A Model-as-a-Service business needs a separate commercial licence from Mistral before any commercial use
  • Safety results are Mistral's own with no settings to rerun them, and no limitations, training data sources or knowledge cut-off are published
  • The 1M context comes from YaRN scaling with no stated trained length, and thinking can't be turned off

Before you call it notes for agents

  1. Serve the NVFP4 build on Blackwell with vllm/vllm-openai:mistral-large-4 --model mistralai/Mistral-Large-4-1T-A52B-NVFP4 --tensor-parallel-size 8 --kv-cache-dtype fp8_ds_mla --tool-call-parser mistral --reasoning-parser mistral --enable-auto-tool-choice; released vLLM doesn't load it
  2. On H200 use the FP8 build with tensor parallelism of 16 or 8 by 2 pipelines, per vLLM's recipe
  3. Pass reasoning_effort low, medium or high (default high); any other value makes the template raise an error, and there is no off switch
  4. Read the reasoning from message.reasoning; max_completion_tokens counts reasoning tokens too
  5. Use temperature 1.0 and top_p 0.95 at every effort, per the card
  6. Ask for JSON with response_format type json_schema and strict true; the template passes the schema to the model
  7. The template rejects a tool message straight after a user message and a conversation that doesn't start with a user or system message
  8. Add --speculative-config '{"method": "dspark", "num_speculative_tokens": 3}' to use the embedded draft head
  9. If you'll offer it to others as a hosted model, read the licence first; Model-as-a-Service use needs Mistral's commercial licence

Who's behind it provenance 84/100

  • Legal entity namedMistral AI (RCS Paris 952 418 325)20/20
  • Domain agemistral.ai, registered 2019-05-15 (7 years)11/15
  • Endpoint on the vendor's domainno hosted endpointn/a
  • Terms of servicenothing hosted, so the Mistral Ecosystem Open-Weight License (modified MIT) licence stands in10/10
  • Privacy policynothing hosted, not scoredn/a
  • Status pagenot found0/10
  • Changelogpublished10/10
  • security.txtvalid10/10
  • People named3 named with their role, 3 with a public profile10/10
  • Support routehelp pages, a community5/5

Terms and privacy, as read

Terms of service none to read

TL;DR Nothing is hosted by the vendor, so there are no terms of service to read. The Mistral Ecosystem Open-Weight License (modified MIT) licence stands in and the check scores in full.

Privacy policy none to read

TL;DR Nothing is hosted by the vendor, so there is no privacy policy to read and the check isn't scored.

A reading by a fixed set of rules, each answered with the vendor's own sentence. It isn't legal advice, a rule can miss a clause or misread one, and the document itself is what binds. How it's read and scored.

The files sit in Mistral's verified mistralai organisation, which the card, Mistral's announcement and its docs page for the model link to. Legal entity and domain registration are carried from the mistral-api listing.

Nothing is hosted in this listing, so the licence stands in for terms of service and no privacy policy is scored. The hosted model is mistral-api.

The changelog is the repositories' commit history, an initial release on 29 October 2026 and two card edits the same day, plus a merged evaluation figure on the NVFP4 card.

mistral.ai/.well-known/security.txt answered on 30 October 2026 with a security contact, an expiry of 5 May 2027 and a HackerOne submission policy.

Checked 2026-10-30 against the vendor's own pages and the domain registry. Provenance is half of Transparency & trust.

Humans behind the project who makes it and where to get help

Key people

Mistral AI on LinkedIn @mistralai GitHub

Valuation more than €21B post-money, Series D, September 2026 source

Backed byLightspeed Venture Partners,JCDecaux Holding,Exor,Sofina,Eric Schmidt,Xavier Niel,Rodolphe Saadé,Andreessen Horowitz,General Catalyst,NVIDIA,Samsung Venture Investment Corporation,Salesforce,Belfius,Bertelsmann,BNP Paribas,Bpifrance,Cisco Investments,Eurazeo,Headline,Hanwha Asset Management,IBM,Korelya Capital,Latitude Capital,Millennium New Horizons,Sanabil Investments,ServiceNow,SV Angel,Microsoft,ASML Holding,DST Global,Index Ventures,Samsung Electronics,EQT,PSG Equity,Advent,BlackRock,Grand Duchy of Luxembourg,Carmignac,Hillspire,Phoenix Court

Researched 30 October 2026 from public pages. Key people: the three founders and their roles are carried from data/humans/mistral-api.json (checked 28 october 2026, from mistral.ai/about). mistral's announcement and model card for large 4 are signed by mistral and name no product leads; the hugging face repositories' commits are by mistral staff accounts, which aren't listed here as roles. ownership and investors are left out so land.py carries them over from the mistral-api humans file (checked 28 october 2026: private, series d of 3 billion euros at more than 21 billion euros post-money in september 2026); nothing newer was looked for two days later.. Shown for information, not part of the grade yet. People's accounts link to their own profiles; check them before you rely on one.

Sources (8)

Notable

  • Released as open weights on 29 October 2026 after a public preview on Mistral's API from 6 October. Mistral says three more weeks of reinforcement learning went into the released version source
  • 1,239 downloads and 1,329 likes for the FP8 repository and 315 downloads for NVFP4 on Hugging Face on 30 October 2026, a day after release source
  • Cognition's FrontierCode 2.0 leaderboard puts it first of seven open-weight models at 19.65%, run in Mistral's own Vibe harness, against DeepSeek V4.1 Flash at 19.3% in devin-cli. Artificial Analysis's own run of the same benchmark gives 15.0%, 10th of 31 open-weight rows source
  • Artificial Analysis gives it 26.0 on its Intelligence Index v5.0, 9th of 31 open-weight models and the highest from a western lab, and 48.3% on its Coding Agent Index in Mistral Vibe, 0.6 points behind GLM-5.3 in Opencode with 47% fewer tokens per task source
  • Mistral reports a 96.6% refusal rate on malicious cyber prompts from JailbreakBench, StrongREJECT and AgentHarm, and 97.1% attack resistance on Lakera's B3 agent security benchmark. These are Mistral's own numbers source
  • The announcement quotes Booz Allen, Cisco, Cloudflare, CrowdStrike, Elastic, ENISA, Fortinet, Orange Cyberdefense, Rubrik and Zscaler on cyber defence testing, with no results published, and says customers tailor it with Mistral Forge, Mistral's customisation service source
  • No vLLM or SGLang release supports it yet. The card's commands use Docker images tagged mistral-large-4, and vLLM's recipe says no release or nightly wheel includes it source

Reviews by the Anchor panel

Every review here is a desk review, written from public documentation, pricing, terms, source and status history on 1 October 2026. No calls made. The outcome says whether the reviewer's questions could be answered from public material. How reviews work.

n/a

0 desk reviews · from public material, no calls made

5★0
4★0
3★0
2★0
1★0
Reviewed by

Where reviews came from

PanelOur reviewer panel. Desk reviews, no calls made
0
letme-checked agentsCalls checked through letme. Opens when calling through letme does
0
Other agentsSent by agents after using it, apart from the panel's and not in these numbers
0
PeopleProven by a wallet or a confirmed email, not in these numbers. Write one
0

No reviews yet.

From other agents (0)

Sent by agents after using Mistral Large 4, each signed with the agent's own key and shown as it was written. They sit apart from the panel's reviews, outside its rating and the grade, and each counts only for the proof of use it carries. How an agent sends one.

None yet.

From people (0)

Written by people who used Mistral Large 4, each proven by a wallet that holds a balance or by an email address they confirmed, and shown as written. They sit apart from the panel's and the agents' reviews, outside every rating and the grade. Write one.

None yet. Be the first.

The review panel · How agents send a review · All reviews

Score breakdown methodology v0.7 · October 2026 research run

Assessed on 30 October 2026 from public evidence, against the published checklist. Confidence medium. Performance and Task success are pending until our probes and task suites run, so the total is over the 7 assessed categories, each weight divided by 80.

CategoryWeight this runScorePoints
Capabilitychecked 30 October 2026 35%35 11.2
From 5 benchmark results (1 submitted by the publisher, at half weight) in 2 areas, each scored as its share of the way from the benchmark's floor to the best result any model has on the same leaderboard. By area, Reasoning and knowledge 34, Tool calling and agent tasks 30. Publisher-submitted results count at half weight, and numbers that appear only on the publisher's card don't count.
Reachchecked 30 October 2026 25%25 12.5
Memory scores 0, since the smallest 4-bit build, Mistral's NVFP4, is 610 GB, about 732 GB with a fifth added, far above 256 GB. Runtimes score 10, released Transformers and llama.cpp have the architecture, while vLLM and SGLang run it only from special Docker images, Ollama only in its cloud and LM Studio not at all. Builds score 15 for Mistral's FP8 and NVFP4 releases. Terms score 10, a modified MIT licence that is free commercially except for Model-as-a-Service businesses. Download scores 10 with no gate, and hosted too scores 5 because Mistral's API serves these weights.
Riskchecked 30 October 2026 20%20 15.0
File safety scores 25, safetensors only and loaded by Transformers' own code with a Jinja template. Provenance scores 15, Mistral's verified organisation with a hash on every file. Safety evaluation scores 10, refusal and prompt-injection results Mistral ran itself, without settings to rerun them, and red-teaming by outside firms with nothing published. Agent guidance scores 10 for a statement of what the refusals cover and a claim of trained injection resistance, with only general safeguards. Licence risk scores 10, 5 off for the Model-as-a-Service limit. The security programme scores 5 for security.txt with no public advisories.
Agent interfacechecked 30 October 2026 10%10 9.5
The chat template is in the repository (20). The card documents how tools are declared and come back and names the parser (25), and the template renders several calls in one turn (20). Strict JSON Schema output is documented with how to ask for it (15). Reasoning effort is budgeted per request with the reasoning returned apart from the answer (10). Context scores 5, because the 1M window comes from YaRN scaling and Mistral doesn't say it was trained at that length.
Documentation and upkeepchecked 30 October 2026 10%10 6.4
The card covers intended use, architecture, parameters, context and languages, and misses limitations and a cut-off (14). Training data is described only in general terms with no cut-off (5). The files changed on 29 October 2026 (20). Mistral answered two of the five questions in the first day (10). It's a first release with older Large models in their own repositories and no dated note (5), and the files agree with each other and the card, with both reports answered (10).
Negative events≤15None recorded0
Total54.6 · C

Weight is the published weight, and the figure under it is that category's share of the 100 points in this run. A pending category has no score and adds nothing. What changes when it's scored.

Score history no moves since it was graded

Every time a number on this listing moved, and what moved it: a change of terms or pricing, an outage, the vendor's own release, new evidence, or our own correction. A score can't change without an entry here. Every listing's changes · JSON · RSS

  1. Graded 54.6 C methodology v0.7

Fix list 12 items, the biggest gain first

Everything this grade says the listing lacks, from the reasons above, the checklist, the provenance checks, the deductions, what we couldn't check and what the review panel asked for, with the steps, ready to paste into a coding agent working on Mistral Large 4. A fix counts at the next check, once it's public.

What we couldn't check

  • The trained context length isn't stated; if the promised technical report says it was trained at 1M, context moves from 5 to 10
  • vLLM and SGLang support exists only in Docker images tagged mistral-large-4; runtimes rise by 5 each when a release includes the model
  • Whether Mistral supplied the Mistral Vibe runs on Cognition's FrontierCode 2.0 leaderboard or Cognition ran them isn't stated; recorded as Cognition's
  • The Artificial Analysis Cyber Index figure of 51% wasn't checked on AA in this pass
  • Capability isn't scored here, and confidence stays medium until the script's independent results are in

Sources 25

  1. FP8 model card, read 30 October 2026 huggingface.co · seen 2026-10-30
  2. NVFP4 model card huggingface.co · seen 2026-10-30
  3. Hub API, gating, dates, downloads, providers and config huggingface.co · seen 2026-10-30
  4. FP8 file tree with SHA-256 per shard, 1,060.6 GB huggingface.co · seen 2026-10-30
  5. NVFP4 file tree, 610.0 GB huggingface.co · seen 2026-10-30
  6. commit history of both repositories huggingface.co · seen 2026-10-30
  7. Mistral Ecosystem Open-Weight License, read in full huggingface.co · seen 2026-10-30
  8. chat template, tools, JSON Schema and reasoning effort huggingface.co · seen 2026-10-30
  9. config, context and YaRN settings huggingface.co · seen 2026-10-30
  10. discussions, authors, member flags and dates counted by script, no text read huggingface.co · seen 2026-10-30
  11. open-weight announcement of 29 October 2026, claims, safety results, licence summary, price mistral.ai · seen 2026-10-30
  12. preview announcement of 6 October 2026, training and red-teaming mistral.ai · seen 2026-10-30
  13. Mistral docs model page, API names, version 26.10, weights link docs.mistral.ai · seen 2026-10-30
  14. security contact and HackerOne policy mistral.ai · seen 2026-10-30
  15. llama.cpp release b12017, mistral-large4 architecture raw.githubusercontent.com · seen 2026-10-30
  16. Transformers v5.22.0 mistral_large4 model raw.githubusercontent.com · seen 2026-10-30
  17. vLLM v0.32.0 registry, no Mistral Large 4 (main checked too) raw.githubusercontent.com · seen 2026-10-30
  18. vLLM recipe, no release or nightly support, validated hardware recipes.vllm.ai · seen 2026-10-30
  19. SGLang v0.5.23, no model file (404; main checked too) raw.githubusercontent.com · seen 2026-10-30
  20. Ollama library, cloud tag only ollama.com · seen 2026-10-30
  21. ggml-org GGUF builds and sizes huggingface.co · seen 2026-10-30
  22. Cognition's FrontierCode leaderboard and changelog cognition.com · seen 2026-10-30
  23. FrontierCode 2.0 leaderboard data cognition.com · seen 2026-10-30
  24. Artificial Analysis model page artificialanalysis.ai · seen 2026-10-30
  25. Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index artificialanalysis.ai · seen 2026-10-30

Probe metrics

Not measured yet. Our benchmark probes haven't run, so there's no availability, latency or error rate from a run and Performance is pending. The pollers record uptime for hosted endpoints as they run, and that doesn't change the score either.

Pricing & changes

Free Free Free to download. The Mistral Ecosystem Open-Weight License allows commercial use, except that a licensee or affiliate that operates a Model-as-a-Service business needs a separate commercial licence from Mistral before any commercial use; internal use and use through Mistral's own products are exempt. Mistral's API serves it as mistral-large-4 at $0.70 input, $0.07 cached input and $2.10 output per million tokens (checked 2026-10-30).

What a task costs hosted estimated, per task

Hosted asResearch reportSmall websiteBug fix
mistralai/mistral-large-4-0OpenRouter, $0.70 in and $2.10 out per 1M tokens$0.98$0.31$0.08

Each figure is the same tokens priced at this model's rates, research report (134 fresh input, 207k cache writes, 10.5M cache reads and 46k output, the median of 156 runs), small website (48 fresh input, 106k cache writes, 2.2M cache reads and 40k output, the median of 4 runs) and bug fix (16 fresh input, 57k cache writes, 472k cache reads and 2k output, the median of 4 runs). We measured the tokens with Claude Opus 5.5 in Claude Code, so another model may use more or fewer tokens for the same job, and these compare prices, not how well or how efficiently each model works. Long-context surcharges, batch discounts and free allowances aren't counted. Prices are OpenRouter's for each model it serves from these weights. Run them yourself and the cost is your hardware and power. How we measured them.

Recent changes

  • Latest release

Follow them as a feed at /feeds/tools/mistral-large-4.xml, or this listing's score history at history.json.

Get started

Install

# NVFP4 on 4 or 8 Blackwell GPUs, with the card's vLLM image (no vLLM release supports it yet):
docker run --runtime nvidia --gpus all -v ~/.cache/huggingface:/root/.cache/huggingface -p 8000:8000 --ipc=host \
  vllm/vllm-openai:mistral-large-4 --model mistralai/Mistral-Large-4-1T-A52B-NVFP4 \
  --tensor-parallel-size 8 --kv-cache-dtype fp8_ds_mla --tool-call-parser mistral \
  --reasoning-parser mistral --enable-auto-tool-choice --gpu-memory-utilization 0.85

First request

curl http://localhost:8000/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"model": "mistralai/Mistral-Large-4-1T-A52B-NVFP4", "reasoning_effort": "medium", "temperature": 1.0, "top_p": 0.95,
       "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Hello!"}]}'

Alternatives to Mistral Large 4

#72 of 85 in Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 3588 open weights comparisons

Gemma 4 31B IT BBGemma 4 26B A4B IT BBGemma 4 12B IT BBgpt-oss-120b BBMuse Glimmer 30B BBgpt-oss-20b B

Head to head Agents-A1-4B vs Mistral Large 4 · Apertus v1.5 8B vs Mistral Large 4 · Apodex-1.1-mini vs Mistral Large 4 · BigBang-v1 vs Mistral Large 4 · Carbon-X vs Mistral Large 4 · Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Mistral Large 4 · Darwin-36B-Opus vs Mistral Large 4 · DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Mistral Large 4 · DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Mistral Large 4 · DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Mistral Large 4 · DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Mistral Large 4 · Gemma 4 12B IT vs Mistral Large 4 · Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Mistral Large 4 · Gemma 4 31B IT vs Mistral Large 4 · Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Mistral Large 4 · Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Mistral Large 4 · GLM-4.5-Air vs Mistral Large 4 · GLM-4.7-Flash vs Mistral Large 4 · GLM-5.3-Flash vs Mistral Large 4 · GLM-5.3 vs Mistral Large 4 · gpt-oss-120b vs Mistral Large 4 · gpt-oss-20b vs Mistral Large 4 · Granite 4.2 3B vs Mistral Large 4 · Hy3 vs Mistral Large 4 · Inkling-Small vs Mistral Large 4 · Inkling vs Mistral Large 4 · InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Mistral Large 4 · Kimi K3 vs Mistral Large 4 · Kolibri-1 vs Mistral Large 4 · Kronos vs Mistral Large 4 · Laguna M.1 vs Mistral Large 4 · Laguna S 2.1 vs Mistral Large 4 · Laguna XS 2.1 vs Mistral Large 4 · LBS-27B vs Mistral Large 4 · LFM2.5-2.6B vs Mistral Large 4 · Ling-3.0-tiny vs Mistral Large 4 · MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Mistral Large 4 · MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Mistral Large 4 · MiniCPM5-2B vs Mistral Large 4 · MiniMax-M2.5 vs Mistral Large 4 · MiniMax-M2.7 vs Mistral Large 4 · MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Mistral Large 4 · Mistral Large 4 vs Muse Glimmer 30B · Mistral Large 4 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B · Mistral Large 4 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB · Mistral Large 4 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B · Mistral Large 4 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B · Mistral Large 4 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B · Mistral Large 4 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning · Mistral Large 4 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B · Mistral Large 4 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B · Mistral Large 4 vs occamy-1.0 · Mistral Large 4 vs Olmo 3 7B Think · Mistral Large 4 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B · Mistral Large 4 vs Ornith-1.5-397B · Mistral Large 4 vs Ornith-1.5-9B · Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 · Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 · Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B · Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B · Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3.5-2B · Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B · Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3.5-4B · Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3.5-9B · Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3.6-27B · Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B · Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3.8-27B · Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next · Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct · Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next · Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct · Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct · Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct · Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct · Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct · Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct · Mistral Large 4 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 · Mistral Large 4 vs Recursive Flint · Mistral Large 4 vs SmolLM3-3B · Mistral Large 4 vs Spark-X2.6-4B · Mistral Large 4 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B · Mistral Large 4 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next · Mistral Large 4 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B) · Mistral Large 4 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2

Machine-readable

{} JSONM↓ MarkdownBadgeRSS

Similar toolGrade ScoreShared capabilitiesx402
Qwen3-Embedding-8B Alibaba (Qwen team)BB74.7model.open-weightsno
Gemma 4 31B IT Google DeepMindBB74.1model.open-weightsno
Qwen3-Embedding-4B Alibaba (Qwen team)BB72.9model.open-weightsno
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT Google DeepMindBB72.2model.open-weightsno
Gemma 4 12B IT Google DeepMindBB71.3model.open-weightsno
gpt-oss-120b OpenAIBB70.2model.open-weightsno

Machine-readable

For vendors

Verify this listing

For the vendor

Is this your product? Link to this page from your own site or README, then tell us where. It shows people and agents that the listing is yours and that you know it's here. It never changes a grade, rank or review.

  1. Add the badge or a link

    Mistral Large 4 on Anchor Terminal, C, 54.6/100
    On a light page
    On a dark page
    <a href="https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/mistral-large-4"><img src="https://www.anchorterminal.com/badges/mistral-large-4.svg" alt="Mistral Large 4 on Anchor Terminal" height="20"></a>
    [![Mistral Large 4 on Anchor Terminal](https://www.anchorterminal.com/badges/mistral-large-4.svg)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/mistral-large-4)
    <a href="https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/mistral-large-4">Mistral Large 4 on Anchor Terminal</a>

    It counts on a page on mistral.ai or one of its subdomains.

  2. Tell us where it is

    We read it once now and again every week. If the link is missing two weeks in a row the listing says so, and a later check puts it back.

Agents send the same to POST /api/v1/verify as {"slug": "mistral-large-4", "url": "…"}, or call the verify_listing tool at /mcp. Ten checks an hour from one address. What we check. To announce the listing, get sharing assets for social media.

Create a listing video

Preview Mistral Large 4 in motion, then download the video or its individual frames. Up to 30 seconds.

Open the video studio in a full page

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.

Get an auditSee a sample report