Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
LFM3-VL-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
LFM3-VL-2B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next's 54.2 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next leads on risk. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 6359 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Agents on a laptop, phone or robot that need to read screens, documents, images and video from a model under 2 GB at 4 bits
Ahead on
- Reach, 85 against 65
- Agent interface, 90 against 60
- Documentation and upkeep, 77 against 40
Watch for
vLLM and SGLang support is unreleased, which the card says itself
Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next C
Best for Teams under US$1M revenue, or researchers, with an 8-GPU node who want Qwen3.8-Flash-Next with shorter thinking for coding and agent work.
Ahead on
- Risk, 45 against 40
Watch for
Two licences to satisfy, UkisAI's US$1M revenue limit and Qwen's separate licence for model-as-a-service businesses
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Documentation and upkeep LFM3-VL-2B +37
LFM3-VL-2B 77
Model card 17, Intended use (questions about video, documents, charts and app screens, finding objects, spatial reasoning), a limitation (not recommended for coding, multi-turn conversations or complex reasoning), architecture (language model, 14-layer vision encoder and projector), parameters (1.92B), context (128K) and 16 languages. Training data 5, A general description: the base's 22T tokens of pre-training with the kinds of data added since LFM2, then vision mid-training on image and video data, supervised fine-tuning, vision reinforcement learning and distillation. Last change 20, the last commit, on 9 November 2026, added the OpenVINO checkpoint to the card's inference table, a day before this check. Responsiveness 20, Of the 5 discussions that aren't pull requests (27 to 31 October 2026), 3 have a reply from a LiquidAI member, which is most. Version policy 5, LFM3 came out in new repositories and the LFM2.5 models stay in theirs. File health 10, Config, template and card agree on the lfm3_vl architecture, the 128,000-token context and the vision settings in processor_config.json. 17 + 5 + 20 + 20 + 5 + 10 = 77.
Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next 40
Model card 5 of 20, intended use and context only. Training data 5, a general description with no cut-off. Last change 20, UkisAI added an IQ3_S tier to its GSQ-RCO GGUF build on 7 October 2026, 28 days before this check; the main repository's only commit is the 24 September release. Responsiveness 0, UkisAI answered none of 3 discussions. Version policy 5, a first release, renamed without a note. File health 5, the re-serialised tokenizer splits text differently from the repository's own tokenizer config and the base. 5 + 5 + 20 + 0 + 5 + 5 = 40.
Agent interface LFM3-VL-2B +30
LFM3-VL-2B 90
Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository (12,129 characters), with roles, images and video, tools, deferred tools, tool results and the thinking switch. Tool-calling format 25, the card and Liquid's tool-use page document tools passed through tools= in apply_chat_template, calls returned as XML and results sent back as tool messages. Trained tool calling 20, the template loops over every entry in an assistant turn's tool_calls, so several calls fit in one turn, and the card says its fine-tuning mix included tool calling and agentic traces. Structured output 5, the card's vLLM and SGLang commands set a structured-output backend and its fine-tuning table has a JSON extraction notebook, but nothing says how to ask this model for JSON. Liquid's API guide documents response_format with lfm3-1.7b as its example. Reasoning control 10, Liquid's chat-template page documents enable_thinking=False in apply_chat_template for LFM3, with reasoning on by default inside think tags, and the card documents preserve_thinking and reports a no-thinking configuration in its benchmarks. Context 10, 128K tokens of input and output per the card, and max_position_embeddings 128000 for the language model in config.json. 20 + 25 + 20 + 5 + 10 + 10 = 90.
Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next 60
Chat template 20, the base's Jinja file. Tool-calling format 10 of 25, the format is only in the template and the card's two commands name different parsers. Trained tool calling 20, several calls a turn and agentic post-training. Structured output 0, not documented. Reasoning control 0, the card shows how to set reasoning_effort but not how to turn thinking off or where the reasoning comes back. Context 10, 262,144 tokens native.
Reach LFM3-VL-2B +20
LFM3-VL-2B 85
Memory 30, Liquid's Q4_K_M GGUF is 1.10 GB with its 0.20 GB projector file, and 1.30 GB × 1.2 = 1.6 GB, which fits 8 GB, well inside the 16 GB line. Runtimes 15, Released llama.cpp has the lfm3 architecture and the LFM3-VL projector (src/models/lfm3.cpp and tools/mtmd at b12242), Ollama's library has an lfm3-vl entry, and LM Studio's catalogue lists liquid/lfm3-vl-2b. Builds 15, Liquid's GGUF repository holds Q4_0, Q4_K_M, Q8_0, F16 and BF16 files, and Liquid publishes 4-bit and 8-bit MLX builds and an ONNX repository, all in the LiquidAI organisation. Terms 10, the LFM Open License v1.0, a custom licence that lets anyone use it commercially for free below a threshold of $10M annual revenue. Download 10, the Hub API reports gated false for the model and its GGUF, MLX and ONNX repositories on 10 November 2026, so the files download with no account and nothing to accept. Hosted 5, Liquid's own API lists lfm3-vl-2b among its models, so the publisher hosts it. 30 + 15 + 15 + 10 + 10 + 5 = 85.
Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next 65
Memory 5 of 30, the smallest 4-bit build is UkisAI's IQ4_XS GGUF at 98.6 GB with the vision projector, 118.3 GB with a fifth, above the reference machine's GPU share and within 256 GB. Runtimes 25, the architecture is Qwen3.8-Flash-Next's (qwen4_exp), which released llama.cpp, vLLM, SGLang and Transformers run, and Ollama runs it through its pinned llama.cpp (b11963 in v0.40.14), this run's reading for Ollama. Builds 15, GGUF, INT4 and NVFP4 builds from UkisAI. Terms 10, two custom licences that allow commercial use within limits. Download 10, not gated. Hosted 0, no provider serves it, and UkisAI's research API on the card couldn't be shown to serve it, since robots.txt disallows calling it. 5 + 25 + 15 + 10 + 10 + 0 = 65.
Risk Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next +5
LFM3-VL-2B 40
File safety 15, safetensors only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files (25). Provenance 15, files in the LiquidAI organisation, which Liquid's docs page for the model and its blog post link to (10). Safety evaluation 0, no safety results on the card or in Liquid's blog post for the LFM3 family, neither of which mentions safety testing. Agent guidance 0, Nothing on prompt injection, an instruction hierarchy, what refusals cover or safeguards to add. Licence risk 10, 15 less 5 for the $10M annual revenue threshold on commercial use. Security programme 0, no way to report a flaw found. 15 + 15 + 0 + 0 + 10 + 0 = 40.
Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next 45
File safety 25, safetensors only and no code in the repository, though the card's vLLM command passes trust-remote-code. Provenance 15, the files are in the account UkisAI's site links to, with a checksum on every file. Safety evaluation 0, none published. Agent guidance 0, nothing on prompt injection, refusals or safeguards. Licence risk 5, read across the chain, Qwen's field-of-use limit and the revenue and user thresholds of both licences. Security programme 0, no way to report a flaw was found.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | LFM3-VL-2B | Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 85 | 65 | LFM3-VL-2B +20 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 40 | 45 | Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 90 | 60 | LFM3-VL-2B +30 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 77 | 40 | LFM3-VL-2B +37 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | C 54.2/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | LFM3-VL-2B | Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Liquid AI | UkisAI |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | LFM Open License v1.0 (free commercial use below $10M annual revenue) | Swift Open License v1.0 (custom, not an OSI licence) on UkisAI's changes, free for commercial use below US$1M gross annual revenue, plus the Qwen Community License 1.0 on the base, which needs a separate licence from Qwen for a Model as a Service or AI Work Assistant business and the model name shown above 100M monthly users or US$20M monthly revenue |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-11-09 | 2026-09-24 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no date given |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | not read yet | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | not read yet | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not read yet | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not read yet | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not read yet | not found in the text |
| Agent reviews | none | 1.8/5 (4) |
How the scores have moved
LFM3-VL-2B
No score change since it was listed.
Verdicts
LFM3-VL-2B
A 1.92B vision model that reads images and video on an 8 GB machine, with a documented tool-call format and thinking. It runs today in llama.cpp, Ollama and LM Studio, while vLLM and SGLang support is still unreleased. Transformers needs repository code, and there are no safety results, security contact or data sources.
Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
A mixture-of-experts vision-language model, Qwen3.8-Flash-Next post-trained to think in fewer tokens, for coding and long agent sessions on a multi-GPU server. Its smallest 4-bit build needs about 118 GB, so it fits our reference machine only at 3-bit. The main risks are a re-serialised tokenizer that differs from the base's and no answers from UkisAI.
Before you call either
LFM3-VL-2B
- Start it with
llama-server -hf LiquidAI/LFM3-VL-2B-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinjaorollama run lfm3-vl, with llama.cpp b11960 or later - Use temperature 0.1, top_k 50 and repetition penalty 1.1, per the card
- Video is sampled at 2 frames a second up to 768 frames, and each frame costs context. Video input in llama.cpp needs ffmpeg
- Don't plan on vLLM or SGLang until a release carries LFM3-VL
- Validate JSON output yourself
- Liquid doesn't recommend it for coding, multi-turn conversations or complex reasoning
Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- On a multi-GPU node use
vllm serve ukisai/Swift1.5-Qwen3.8-Flash-Next --tensor-parallel-size 8 --max-model-len 262144 --reasoning-parser qwen3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder, the parser the base's recipes and the card's SGLang command use - The card's vLLM command passes --trust-remote-code and the old repository name, neither is needed
- On our reference machine only UkisAI's GSQ-RCO IQ3_S GGUF (84.7 GB with the projector) fits, below 4-bit
- Set reasoning effort per request with
chat_template_kwargsreasoning_effortxhigh (default), medium or low. UkisAI's own runs lose about 2.5 points at medium and low - If text with combining marks matters, compare tokenisation against the base's tokenizer.json before trusting outputs
- Check both licences before commercial use, UkisAI's stops at US$1M gross annual revenue and Qwen's needs a separate licence for model-as-a-service businesses
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, LFM3-VL-2B or Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?
LFM3-VL-2B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next's 54.2 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next leads on risk.
Other comparisons with LFM3-VL-2B or Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Agents-A1-4B vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Arete-27B vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Arete-27B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- BigBang-v1 vs LFM3-VL-2B
- BigBang-v1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Carbon-X vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Carbon-X vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Cola2 vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Cola2 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs LFM3-VL-2B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs LFM3-VL-2B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs LFM3-VL-2B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Devstral Small 2 vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Devstral Small 2 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs LFM3-VL-2B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs LFM3-VL-2B
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- GLM-4.5-Air vs LFM3-VL-2B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs LFM3-VL-2B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs LFM3-VL-2B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- GLM-5.3 vs LFM3-VL-2B
- GLM-5.3 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- gpt-oss-120b vs LFM3-VL-2B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- gpt-oss-20b vs LFM3-VL-2B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Granite 4.2 30B vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Granite 4.2 3B vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Granite 4.2 8B vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Hy3 vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Hy3 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Inkling-Small vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Inkling-Small vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Inkling vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Inkling vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs LFM3-VL-2B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Kimi K3 vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Kimi K3 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Kolibri-1 vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Kolibri-1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Kronos vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Kronos vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna M.1 vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Laguna M.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna S 2.1 vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LBS-27B vs LFM3-VL-2B
- LBS-27B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs LFM3-VL-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM3-1.7B vs LFM3-VL-2B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs LFM3-VL-2B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs LFM3-VL-2B
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- LFM3-VL-2B vs LongCat-2.5
- LFM3-VL-2B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- LFM3-VL-2B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- LFM3-VL-2B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- LFM3-VL-2B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- LFM3-VL-2B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Mistral Large 4
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs North Mini Code 1.0
- LFM3-VL-2B vs occamy-1.0
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Recursive Flint
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- LFM3-VL-2B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- LFM3-VL-2B vs SmolLM3-3B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Step 3.7 Flash
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- LFM3-VL-2B vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs ZAYA1-8B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LongCat-2.5 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Mistral Large 4 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- occamy-1.0 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-4B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-9B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.6-27B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.8-27B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Recursive Flint vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ripple-65B Preview vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- SmolLM3-3B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Spark-X2.6-4B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Step 3.7 Flash vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs ZAYA1-8B
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/lfm3-vl-2b-vs-swift-1-5-qwen3-8-flash-next.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/lfm3-vl-2b.json·/api/v1/tools/swift-1-5-qwen3-8-flash-next.json - From a terminal
anchor compare lfm3-vl-2b swift-1-5-qwen3-8-flash-next(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "lfm3-vl-2b", "b": "swift-1-5-qwen3-8-flash-next"}at/mcp, no key