Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Hy3 vs Laguna XS 2.1
Hy3 scores 62.6 (B) on agent readiness against Laguna XS 2.1's 61 (C), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Laguna XS 2.1 leads on reach and agent interface. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Hy3 B
Best for Teams with an 8-GPU server who want an agent-tuned MoE model under plain Apache 2.0
Ahead on
- Risk, 60 against 55
- Documentation and upkeep, 56 against 46
Watch for
597.6 GB in BF16, 299.9 GB in FP8 and 168.5 GB at the smallest 4-bit build
Best for Agents that want a fast local coding model on a 32 GB GPU or Mac, with tool calling and a permissive licence.
Ahead on
- Reach, 85 against 70
- Agent interface, 85 against 75
Watch for
No reply from Poolside to any discussion, including reports about the tokenizer and remote code
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Hy3 | Laguna XS 2.1 | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 70 | 85 | Laguna XS 2.1 +15 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 60 | 55 | Hy3 +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 75 | 85 | Laguna XS 2.1 +10 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 56 | 46 | Hy3 +10 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | B 62.6/100 | C 61/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Hy3 | Laguna XS 2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Tencent (Hy team) | Poolside |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | OpenMDW-1.1 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-07-20 | 2026-08-19 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 2.8/5 (4) | 2.8/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Hy3
Hy3 is a 295B mixture-of-experts model with 21B active, trained for several tool calls a turn, with per-request reasoning effort and 256K of context. It needs an 8-GPU server for FP8 or about 200 GB for a 4-bit build. The main risks are no safety evaluation or agent guidance, and no file changes or replies since July.
Laguna XS 2.1
A small coding and agent cousin with 3B active parameters, so it's quick on modest hardware. Poolside's 4-bit GGUF, also Ollama's default, needs about 24 GB, and every major runtime runs it. The main risks are that nobody at Poolside answers its discussions, there are no safety results, and the SGLang route runs repository code.
Before you call either
Hy3
- Start it with vLLM on 8 GPUs, vllm serve tencent/Hy3-FP8 --tensor-parallel-size 8 --tool-call-parser hy_v3 --reasoning-parser hy_v3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --served-model-name hy3
- In SGLang use --tool-call-parser hunyuan --reasoning-parser hunyuan, as the card shows
- Pass reasoning_effort (no_think, low or high) in chat_template_kwargs; the default is no_think, and any other value raises a template error
- With the vLLM reasoning parser the chain of thought comes back in message.reasoning and the answer in message.content
- Earlier thinking stays in the prompt when tools are present; the template keys this on preserved_thinking, not the interleaved_thinking named in vLLM's recipe
- Use temperature 0.9 and top_p 1.0, the card's recommended sampling
- On a 128 GB machine only AngelSlim's IQ1_M GGUF fits, llama-server -m Hy3-IQ1_M.gguf -ctk q8_0 -ctv q8_0 -fa on -c 65536, with llama.cpp b11768 or later; at 89.4 GB × 1.2 it sits right at the 107.4 GB ceiling, so shorten the context if it fails to load, and expect a 1-bit build to fall short of Tencent's numbers
- Without the hardware, call it through Featherless AI or DeepInfra via Hugging Face's inference providers
Laguna XS 2.1
- Quickest start is
ollama run laguna-xs-2.1, 20 GB of files, the same Q4_K_M as Poolside's GGUF - On our reference machine use
llama-server -hf poolside/Laguna-XS-2.1-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinja -c 131072, from a llama.cpp release with the laguna architecture (b11772 has it), or BF16 with vLLM (66.9 GB) - With vLLM use
--tool-call-parser poolside_v1 --reasoning-parser poolside_v1 --enable-auto-tool-choice, on a build with vllm-project/vllm#47311, or--tool-call-parser glm47on older builds - Thinking is off in the template unless you pass
enable_thinkingtrue or start the server with--default-chat-template-kwargs '{"enable_thinking": true}', which Poolside recommends for agentic coding - Pass earlier reasoning back as
reasoning_contentin the history, since the card says reasoning may stop in later steps if it's dropped - Sampling per the card is temperature 1.0 and top_k 20
- The card warns that Ollama on Apple Silicon may return empty output until llama.cpp#25389 ships
- Validate JSON output yourself or use the runtime's guided decoding, since structured output isn't documented
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Hy3 or Laguna XS 2.1?
Hy3 scores 62.6 (B) on agent readiness against Laguna XS 2.1's 61 (C), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Laguna XS 2.1 leads on reach and agent interface.
Other comparisons with Hy3 or Laguna XS 2.1
- Agents-A1-4B vs Hy3
- Agents-A1-4B vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Hy3
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Hy3
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Laguna XS 2.1
- BigBang-v1 vs Hy3
- BigBang-v1 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Hy3
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Hy3
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Laguna XS 2.1
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Hy3
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Hy3
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Laguna XS 2.1
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Hy3
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Hy3
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Hy3
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Hy3
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Hy3
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Hy3
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Hy3
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Laguna XS 2.1
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Hy3
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Laguna XS 2.1
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Hy3
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Laguna XS 2.1
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Hy3
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Laguna XS 2.1
- GLM-5.3 vs Hy3
- GLM-5.3 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- gpt-oss-120b vs Hy3
- gpt-oss-120b vs Laguna XS 2.1
- gpt-oss-20b vs Hy3
- gpt-oss-20b vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Hy3
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Hy3 vs Inkling
- Hy3 vs Inkling-Small
- Hy3 vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- Hy3 vs Kimi K3
- Hy3 vs Kolibri-1
- Hy3 vs Laguna M.1
- Hy3 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Hy3 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Hy3 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Hy3 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Hy3 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Hy3 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Hy3 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Hy3 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Hy3 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Hy3 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Hy3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Hy3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Hy3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Hy3 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Hy3 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Hy3 vs occamy-1.0
- Hy3 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Hy3 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Hy3 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Hy3 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Hy3 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Hy3 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Hy3 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Hy3 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Hy3 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Hy3 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Hy3 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Hy3 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Hy3 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Hy3 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Hy3 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Hy3 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Hy3 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Hy3 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Hy3 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Hy3 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Hy3 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Hy3 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Hy3 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Hy3 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Hy3 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Hy3 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Hy3 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Hy3 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Hy3 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Hy3 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Inkling-Small vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Inkling vs Laguna XS 2.1
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Kimi K3 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Kolibri-1 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Laguna M.1 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs occamy-1.0
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/hy3-vs-laguna-xs-2-1.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/hy3.json·/api/v1/tools/laguna-xs-2-1.json - From a terminal
anchor compare hy3 laguna-xs-2-1(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "hy3", "b": "laguna-xs-2-1"}at/mcp, no key