# Hy3 vs Laguna XS 2.1 (slim)

> Hy3 scores 62.6 (B) to Laguna XS 2.1's 61 (C) for open-weight models you run yourself. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy3-vs-laguna-xs-2-1.md (~5,750 tokens) · this version ~430 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy3-vs-laguna-xs-2-1.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hy3-vs-laguna-xs-2-1
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-10-21
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Hy3 scores 62.6 (B) on agent readiness against Laguna XS 2.1's 61 (C), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Laguna XS 2.1 leads on reach and agent interface. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- Hy3: B 62.6, rank #27 of 100 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/hy3.min.md
- Laguna XS 2.1: C 61, rank #40 of 100 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/laguna-xs-2-1.min.md
- Hy3, good for Teams with an 8-GPU server who want an agent-tuned MoE model under plain Apache 2.0 Ahead on Risk, 60 against 55; Documentation and upkeep, 56 against 46.
- Laguna XS 2.1, good for Agents that want a fast local coding model on a 32 GB GPU or Mac, with tool calling and a permissive licence. Ahead on Reach, 85 against 70; Agent interface, 85 against 75.

| Category | Hy3 | Laguna XS 2.1 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | pending | pending |
| Reach (25%) | 70 | 85 |
| Risk (20%) | 60 | 55 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 75 | 85 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 56 | 46 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Hy3 | Laguna XS 2.1 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Tencent (Hy team) | Poolside |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | OpenMDW-1.1 |
| Last release | 2026-07-20 | 2026-08-19 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked |  |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked |  |