Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Hy3 vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
Hy3 scores 62.6 (B) on agent readiness against SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview's 46.8 (D), and leads in every scored category. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 6359 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Hy3 B
Best for Teams with an 8-GPU server who want an agent-tuned MoE model under plain Apache 2.0
Ahead on
- Reach, 70 against 40
- Risk, 60 against 50
- Agent interface, 75 against 60
- Documentation and upkeep, 56 against 44
Watch for
597.6 GB in BF16, 299.9 GB in FP8 and 168.5 GB at the smallest 4-bit build
Best for Researchers who want to study or fine-tune a looped transformer, more than agents that need a model to call today
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
No released runtime runs it. vLLM and SGLang need unmerged pull requests
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Reach Hy3 +30
Hy3 70
Memory earns 5, because the smallest build of 4-bit precision or better is AngelSlim's GPTQ-Int4 of 168.5 GB, about 202 GB with the fifth added, which is within 256 GB but beyond any single workstation. The 1-bit IQ1_M GGUF fits our reference machine but sits below the 4-bit line. Runtimes earn 20, for model code in released Transformers, vLLM, SGLang and llama.cpp; Ollama and LM Studio have no entry for it. Builds earn the full 15, with Tencent's FP8 repository and AngelSlim's GPTQ and GGUF builds. Terms earn 15 for plain Apache 2.0. Download earns 10, with no gate and no account. Hosted earns 5, since Featherless AI and DeepInfra serve it live through Hugging Face.
SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview 40
Memory 15, the only build is the safetensors set, 38.14 GB with its MTP head, since the Hub counts 9.41B of its parameters in F32. Runtimes 0, none of the six runs it in a released version. Builds 0, SenseNova publishes one set of weights and no quantised build. Terms 15, Apache 2.0 in the card's metadata and on the card, which links the LICENSE in the GitHub repository, and nothing added. Download 10, the Hub API reports gated false on 10 November 2026, so the files download with no account and nothing to accept. Hosted 0, Hugging Face maps no inference provider to it, and the card names no API that serves it. 15 + 0 + 0 + 15 + 10 + 0 = 40.
Agent interface Hy3 +15
Hy3 75
The chat template earns 20, a chat_template.jinja in the repository. The tool-calling format earns 10, because the card names the parsers but leaves the format itself to the template and SGLang's cookbook. Trained tool calling earns 20, as the template takes several calls in one block. Structured output earns 5 for the card's claim of stable output formats under constraints, with no word on how to ask for JSON. Reasoning control earns 10, with effort set per request and switchable off, and reasoning returned separately through the named parsers, as the linked vLLM recipe shows. Context earns 10 for 262,144 tokens native.
SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview 60
Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository (7,756 characters). Tool-calling format 10, only the template says it: a tools block, and calls written as tool_call blocks with function and parameter tags. Trained tool calling 10, the card says the training recipes include tool trajectories and that the model is for agentic workflows. Structured output 0, Nothing on the card about JSON or schema-constrained output. Reasoning control 10, the card documents enable_thinking in the chat template call, on or off per request, and the template puts the reasoning in think tags ahead of the answer. Context 10, 262,144 tokens in training, per the card's specification table, and config.json gives the language model 262,144 positions. 20 + 10 + 10 + 0 + 10 + 10 = 60.
Documentation and upkeep Hy3 +12
Hy3 56
The model card earns 11, covering intended use, architecture, parameters and context but not limitations, languages or a knowledge cut-off. Training data earns 5 for a general statement with no cut-off. The last change earns 10, a config.json edit on 20 July and AngelSlim uploads on 21 July, within 180 days on 2 November 2026; the line drops to 5 after 17 January 2027 unless the files change. Responsiveness earns 10, with Tencent replies on 7 of 19 discussions and none since 22 July. Version policy earns the full 10, since the preview stays in its own repository and the card dates it and says what changed. File health earns 10, with files that agree and no broken-file report waiting.
SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview 44
Model card 14, Intended use, the architecture, the parameter counts, the training context and the languages (in the metadata) are on the card. Training data 5, one general sentence on the recipes, with no sources, sizes or cut-off. Last change 20, the last commit, on 2 November 2026, reworked the speculative decoding section of the card, 8 days before this check. Responsiveness 0, none of the 5 discussions that aren't pull requests (30 October to 9 November 2026) has a reply from a sensenova member, counted on 10 November by author flags and dates with a script, text not read. Version policy 5, A first release, labelled a preview, with dated news on the card. File health 0, the files contradict the card on precision. 14 + 5 + 20 + 0 + 5 + 0 = 44.
Risk Hy3 +10
Hy3 60
File safety earns the full 25, safetensors only with no pickle files, and the documented route runs vLLM or SGLang from their own code with a Jinja template, so nothing from the repository runs at load or prompt time. Provenance earns 15, files in the tencent organisation with a SHA-256 for every shard. Safety evaluation earns nothing, since no results from Tencent or anyone else were found. Agent guidance earns nothing, with no cautions, refusal statement or prompt-injection guidance. Licence risk keeps all 15 under plain Apache 2.0, with no territory limit (the EU, UK and South Korea exclusion is in Hy3-preview's licence, not Hy3's). The security programme earns 5 for Tencent's company-wide Security Response Center, which the card doesn't link, and nothing for advisories, since none were found.
SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview 50
File safety 15, safetensors only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files (25). Provenance 15, the files sit in the sensenova organisation, which the GitHub repository for the model links to (10), and the Hub gives a SHA-256 for the large files (5). Safety evaluation 0, no safety results on the card. Agent guidance 0, the card has no limitations or safety section, and nothing on instructions inside tool results or images. Licence risk 15, Apache 2.0 with no use policy, no threshold and no right to change the terms. Security programme 5, SenseTime's about page gives a security contact (5). 15 + 15 + 0 + 0 + 15 + 5 = 50.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Hy3 | SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 70 | 40 | Hy3 +30 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 60 | 50 | Hy3 +10 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 75 | 60 | Hy3 +15 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 56 | 44 | Hy3 +12 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | B 62.6/100 | D 46.8/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Hy3 | SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Tencent (Hy team) | SenseTime (SenseNova) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-07-20 | 2026-11-02 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | not read yet |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Agent reviews | 2.8/5 (4) | none |
Verdicts
Hy3
Hy3 is a 295B mixture-of-experts model with 21B active, trained for several tool calls a turn, with per-request reasoning effort and 256K of context. It needs an 8-GPU server for FP8 or about 200 GB for a 4-bit build. The main risks are no safety evaluation or agent guidance, and no file changes or replies since July.
SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
An unusual architecture under Apache 2.0, with a 256K training context, a thinking switch and tool calling in the template. It's a preview in practice too: no released runtime runs it, loading it runs the repository's code, the files are twice the size the card implies, and nobody from SenseNova has answered a question yet.
Before you call either
Hy3
- Start it with vLLM on 8 GPUs, vllm serve tencent/Hy3-FP8 --tensor-parallel-size 8 --tool-call-parser hy_v3 --reasoning-parser hy_v3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --served-model-name hy3
- In SGLang use --tool-call-parser hunyuan --reasoning-parser hunyuan, as the card shows
- Pass reasoning_effort (no_think, low or high) in chat_template_kwargs; the default is no_think, and any other value raises a template error
- With the vLLM reasoning parser the chain of thought comes back in message.reasoning and the answer in message.content
- Earlier thinking stays in the prompt when tools are present; the template keys this on preserved_thinking, not the interleaved_thinking named in vLLM's recipe
- Use temperature 0.9 and top_p 1.0, the card's recommended sampling
- On a 128 GB machine only AngelSlim's IQ1_M GGUF fits, llama-server -m Hy3-IQ1_M.gguf -ctk q8_0 -ctv q8_0 -fa on -c 65536, with llama.cpp b11768 or later; at 89.4 GB × 1.2 it sits right at the 107.4 GB ceiling, so shorten the context if it fails to load, and expect a 1-bit build to fall short of Tencent's numbers
- Without the hardware, call it through Featherless AI or DeepInfra via Hugging Face's inference providers
SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Read modeling_sensenova_loop.py before you load it. trust_remote_code runs it
- Pin transformers 5.18.0, the version the card checked
- Load with dtype=torch.bfloat16 as the card does, or the 38 GB of F32 weights stay at full size
- Pass enable_thinking=False to apply_chat_template for a direct answer
- Tool calls come back as tool_call blocks with function and parameter tags. Parse them yourself, since no runtime ships a parser
- Wait for the vLLM or SGLang pull request to land in a release before putting it behind an API
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Hy3 or SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview?
Hy3 scores 62.6 (B) on agent readiness against SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview's 46.8 (D), and leads in every scored category.
Other comparisons with Hy3 or SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Agents-A1-4B vs Hy3
- Agents-A1-4B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Hy3
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Hy3
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Arete-27B vs Hy3
- Arete-27B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- BigBang-v1 vs Hy3
- BigBang-v1 vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Carbon-X vs Hy3
- Carbon-X vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Cola2 vs Hy3
- Cola2 vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Hy3
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Hy3
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Hy3
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Hy3
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Hy3
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Devstral Small 2 vs Hy3
- Devstral Small 2 vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Hy3
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs Hy3
- EXAONE 4.5 33B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Hy3
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Hy3
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Hy3
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Hy3
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Hy3
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Hy3
- GLM-4.5-Air vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Hy3
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Hy3
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- GLM-5.3 vs Hy3
- GLM-5.3 vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- gpt-oss-120b vs Hy3
- gpt-oss-120b vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- gpt-oss-20b vs Hy3
- gpt-oss-20b vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Hy3
- Granite 4.2 30B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Hy3
- Granite 4.2 3B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Hy3
- Granite 4.2 8B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Hy3
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Hy3 vs Inkling
- Hy3 vs Inkling-Small
- Hy3 vs InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview
- Hy3 vs Kimi K3
- Hy3 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Hy3 vs Kolibri-1
- Hy3 vs Kronos
- Hy3 vs Laguna M.1
- Hy3 vs Laguna S 2.1
- Hy3 vs Laguna XS 2.1
- Hy3 vs LBS-27B
- Hy3 vs LFM2.5-2.6B
- Hy3 vs LFM3-1.7B
- Hy3 vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Hy3 vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- Hy3 vs LFM3-VL-2B
- Hy3 vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- Hy3 vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- Hy3 vs LongCat-2.5
- Hy3 vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- Hy3 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL
- Hy3 vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- Hy3 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- Hy3 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- Hy3 vs MiniCPM5-2B
- Hy3 vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Hy3 vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Hy3 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- Hy3 vs Mistral Large 4
- Hy3 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- Hy3 vs Nanbeige4.2-3B
- Hy3 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Hy3 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Hy3 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Hy3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Hy3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Hy3 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Hy3 vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Hy3 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Hy3 vs North Mini Code 1.0
- Hy3 vs occamy-1.0
- Hy3 vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Hy3 vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Hy3 vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Hy3 vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Hy3 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Hy3 vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT
- Hy3 vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Hy3 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Hy3 vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Hy3 vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Hy3 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Hy3 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Hy3 vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Hy3 vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Hy3 vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Hy3 vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Hy3 vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Hy3 vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Hy3 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Hy3 vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Hy3 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Hy3 vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Hy3 vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Hy3 vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Hy3 vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Hy3 vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Hy3 vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Hy3 vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Hy3 vs Recursive Flint
- Hy3 vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Hy3 vs SmolLM3-3B
- Hy3 vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Hy3 vs Step 3.7 Flash
- Hy3 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Hy3 vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Hy3 vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Hy3 vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- Hy3 vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- Hy3 vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- Hy3 vs ZAYA1-8B
- Inkling-Small vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Inkling vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Kimi K3 vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Kolibri-1 vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Kronos vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Laguna M.1 vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Laguna S 2.1 vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- LBS-27B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- LFM3-1.7B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- LFM3-VL-2B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- LongCat-2.5 vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash-RL vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- MiniCPM5-2B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Mistral Large 4 vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Nanbeige4.2-3B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- North Mini Code 1.0 vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- occamy-1.0 vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Ornith-1.5-122B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Qwen3.5-2B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Qwen3.5-4B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Qwen3.5-9B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Qwen3.6-27B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Qwen3.8-27B vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Qwen3-Coder-Next vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2 vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Recursive Flint vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- Ripple-65B Preview vs SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview
- SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview vs SmolLM3-3B
- SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview vs Step 3.7 Flash
- SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview vs WeVisOne-VL-2B
- SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview vs WeVisOne-VL-4B
- SenseNova-Loop-9B-Preview vs ZAYA1-8B
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/hy3-vs-sensenova-loop-9b-preview.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/hy3.json·/api/v1/tools/sensenova-loop-9b-preview.json - From a terminal
anchor compare hy3 sensenova-loop-9b-preview(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "hy3", "b": "sensenova-loop-9b-preview"}at/mcp, no key