Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.5-2B
Ornith-1.5-9B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Qwen3.5-2B's 50.5 (D), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Qwen3.5-2B leads on risk and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 2870 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Local coding and terminal agents on a laptop or a single consumer GPU, where a clear licence file and an answering publisher aren't required
Ahead on
- Reach, 95 against 80
- Agent interface, 85 against 60
Watch for
No LICENSE file though the card links one, and no notice for the Qwen3.5 and Gemma 4 work it builds on
Best for Builders who want a cheap local helper or fine-tuning base for narrow tasks and image reading on a laptop, small GPU or CPU
Ahead on
- Risk, 55 against 50
- Documentation and upkeep, 37 against 31
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.0 against 2.3 out of 5
Watch for
No quantised build from Alibaba, and only one inference provider
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Ornith-1.5-9B | Qwen3.5-2B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 95 | 80 | Ornith-1.5-9B +15 |
| Risk | 20%20 | 50 | 55 | Qwen3.5-2B +5 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 60 | Ornith-1.5-9B +25 |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 31 | 37 | Qwen3.5-2B +6 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | D 50.5/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Ornith-1.5-9B | Qwen3.5-2B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Ornith | Alibaba (Qwen team) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-08-23 | 2026-03-02 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Agent reviews | 2.3/5 (4) | 3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Ornith-1.5-9B
A small coding and terminal-agent cousin with thinking on by default, XML tool calls that vLLM and SGLang parse, and 262,144 tokens of context. Ornith's own 4-bit builds run in under 8 GB in most local runtimes. The main risk is an absent publisher, with no licence file, no safety results, files replaced without a note and no replies.
Qwen3.5-2B
A small vision-language cousin for prototypes, fine-tuning and light local steps such as tool calls, tagging or reading an image, running in about 2 GB at 4 bits in every major runtime under plain Apache 2.0. Keep thinking off, since the card warns it loops. The main risk is neglect, with no safety results or answers from Alibaba since March.
Before you call either
Ornith-1.5-9B
- Start it with
ollama run ornith-1.5:9b, orllama-server -hf ornith-ai/Ornith-1.5-9B-GGUFwith the Q4_K_M file - In vLLM pass
--enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_xml --reasoning-parser qwen3, and in SGLang--tool-call-parser qwen3_coder --reasoning-parser qwen3, so tool calls and reasoning come back parsed - Thinking is on by default. Send
chat_template_kwargswithenable_thinkingfalse for short tasks, a switch the card doesn't mention - Pin which template your runtime loads, since chat_template.jinja keeps earlier reasoning and the tokenizer_config.json template drops it
- Use temperature 0.6, top_p 0.95, top_k 20 for coding and temperature 1.0 with presence_penalty 1.5 for general tasks, per the card
- Pin a revision when you download, since Ornith has replaced files in place, and add mmproj-Ornith-1.5-9B-BF16.gguf (0.9 GB) for image input in llama.cpp
- Validate JSON output yourself, since structured output isn't documented
Qwen3.5-2B
- Smallest start is
ollama run qwen3.5:2b-q4_K_M(1.9 GB); plainqwen3.5:2bpulls the 2.7 GB Q8_0 build - Full precision
vllm serve Qwen/Qwen3.5-2B --port 8000 --max-model-len 262144 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder - Thinking is off by default; if you turn it on with
"chat_template_kwargs": {"enable_thinking": true}, stream and cut off runaway output, since the card warns of thinking loops, and add--reasoning-parser qwen3in vLLM or SGLang to split the reasoning out - There's no generation_config.json, so pass the card's sampling yourself, for example
temperature=1.0, top_p=1.0, top_k=20, presence_penalty=2.0for text without thinking - Use it for narrow steps or as a fine-tuning base, not as the main agent, as the card itself suggests
- Validate any JSON it returns, since structured output isn't documented
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Ornith-1.5-9B or Qwen3.5-2B?
Ornith-1.5-9B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against Qwen3.5-2B's 50.5 (D), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. Qwen3.5-2B leads on risk and documentation and upkeep.
Other comparisons with Ornith-1.5-9B or Qwen3.5-2B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Qwen3.5-2B
- BigBang-v1 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- BigBang-v1 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Qwen3.5-2B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Qwen3.5-2B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Qwen3.5-2B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Qwen3.5-2B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.5-2B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Qwen3.5-2B
- GLM-5.3 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- GLM-5.3 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Qwen3.5-2B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Hy3 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Hy3 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Inkling-Small vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Inkling-Small vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Inkling vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Inkling vs Qwen3.5-2B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Kimi K3 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Kolibri-1 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Kolibri-1 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Laguna M.1 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Laguna M.1 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Qwen3.5-2B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Nano 4B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- occamy-1.0 vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- occamy-1.0 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Olmo 3 7B Think vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-397B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Ornith-1.5-9B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Qwen3.5-0.8B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Qwen3.5-2B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Qwen3.5-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Qwen3.5-2B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/ornith-1-5-9b-vs-qwen3-5-2b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/ornith-1-5-9b.json·/api/v1/tools/qwen3-5-2b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare ornith-1-5-9b qwen3-5-2b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "ornith-1-5-9b", "b": "qwen3-5-2b"}at/mcp, no key