Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run
LFM3-Audio-2B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
LFM3-Audio-2B and Nanbeige4.3-33B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 60.8 (C). Nanbeige4.3-33B leads on risk. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.
Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 4969 open weights comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Voice agents on a laptop or phone that need speech in, speech out and tool calls from one small model
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
Only llama.cpp and Ollama run it in a release, though the card lists vLLM and SGLang
Best for Agents with a 32 GB GPU (INT4) or more, or the 128 GB reference machine at BF16, that want an Apache-tagged 33B model for long coding and tool loops.
Ahead on
- Risk, 60 against 40
Watch for
Independent results so far are Artificial Analysis's alone (Intelligence Index v5.0 20.4, Terminal-Bench 4.0 29.8 per cent); the card's other agentic numbers are Nanbeige's own runs
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Risk Nanbeige4.3-33B +20
LFM3-Audio-2B 40
File safety 15, safetensors only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files (25). Provenance 15, files in the LiquidAI organisation, which Liquid's docs page for the model and its blog post link to (10). Safety evaluation 0, no safety results on the card or in Liquid's blog post for the LFM3 family, neither of which mentions safety testing. Agent guidance 0, Nothing on prompt injection, an instruction hierarchy, what refusals cover or safeguards to add. Licence risk 10, 15 less 5 for the $10M annual revenue threshold on commercial use. Security programme 0, no way to report a flaw found. 15 + 15 + 0 + 0 + 10 + 0 = 40.
Nanbeige4.3-33B 60
File safety earns 25, safetensors only and no repository code, so the card's trust_remote_code has nothing to run. Provenance earns 15, the lab's own organisation as its arXiv report links it, with a hash for every file. Safety evaluation earns 0 and agent guidance 0, since neither card says anything on either. Licence risk keeps all 15 under Apache 2.0. The security programme earns 5 for BOSS Zhipin's security response centre, which isn't linked to the model.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | LFM3-Audio-2B | Nanbeige4.3-33B | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 35%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Reach | 25%25 | 80 | 80 | even |
| Risk | 20%20 | 40 | 60 | Nanbeige4.3-33B +20 |
| Agent interface | 10%10 | 85 | 85 | even |
| Documentation and upkeep | 10%10 | 52 | 56 | Nanbeige4.3-33B +4 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61/100 | C 60.8/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | LFM3-Audio-2B | Nanbeige4.3-33B |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Open-weight model | Open-weight model |
| Vendor | Liquid AI | Nanbeige LLM Lab (BOSS Zhipin) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | LFM Open License v1.0 (free commercial use below $10M annual revenue) | Apache-2.0 (Hub metadata only; the repository has no LICENSE file) |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-11-03 | 2026-10-31 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
How the scores have moved
LFM3-Audio-2B
No score change since it was listed.
Verdicts
LFM3-Audio-2B
A 2B model that listens and speaks on an 8 GB machine, transcribes and translates 19 languages and turns spoken requests into tool calls. Only llama.cpp and Ollama run it in a release. The context is 32K, voice chat is English only, Liquid hasn't answered the repository's questions, and there are no safety results or data sources.
Nanbeige4.3-33B
A dense 33B Llama-architecture cousin for long agentic coding and office tasks, with per-request thinking, XML tool calls that stock vLLM and SGLang parse, and 512K of context. Nanbeige's INT4 build needs about 27 GB. Artificial Analysis's first independent runs give it 20.4 on its Intelligence Index, and there are no safety results, training data notes or licence file.
Before you call either
LFM3-Audio-2B
- Start it with
llama-server -hf LiquidAI/LFM3-Audio-2B-GGUF:Q4_K_M --jinjaorollama run lfm3-audio - llama.cpp ships examples/realtime_client.py for live speech with this model
- Prefill the assistant turn with an open think tag to let it reason before a text reply
- The context is 32K
- Voice chat is English only, while transcription, synthesis and translation cover 19 languages and locales
- Liquid doesn't recommend it for agentic coding or complex multi-step reasoning
Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Serve with
vllm serve Nanbeige/Nanbeige4.3-33B --enable-auto-tool-choice --reasoning-parser qwen3 --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder, as the card says, or SGLang with the same two parsers - On a 32 GB GPU use Nanbeige/Nanbeige4.3-33B-INT4 with the same vLLM or SGLang flags; the INT8 and FP8 builds need about 43 GB
- Keep
tool_call_formatat its defaultxml, since qwen3_coder parses that format; thejsonoption writes Hermes-style JSON calls, which need a different parser such as vLLM's hermes - Pass
chat_template_kwargs{"preserve_thinking": true}for multi-turn tool use and coding, and{"enable_thinking": false}to skip reasoning, as the card recommends - Use temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95 and up to 65,536 new tokens for agent work, and temperature 0.6 for reasoning and chat, per the card
- Send your own system prompt, since without one the template injects a Chinese identity line, or a Chinese tool-expert prompt when tools are passed
- Send one system message at the start only, as the template raises an error for a later one
- In plain Transformers pass
use_cache=Trueto generate, since config.json and generation_config.json set it false; trust_remote_code isn't needed
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, LFM3-Audio-2B or Nanbeige4.3-33B?
LFM3-Audio-2B and Nanbeige4.3-33B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 60.8 (C). Nanbeige4.3-33B leads on risk.
Other comparisons with LFM3-Audio-2B or Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Agents-A1-4B vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Agents-A1-4B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Apertus v1.5 8B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Apodex-1.1-mini vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Arete-27B vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Arete-27B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- BigBang-v1 vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- BigBang-v1 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Carbon-X vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Carbon-X vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Cosmos-Reason2-2B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Darwin-36B-Opus vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Gemma 4 12B IT vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Gemma 4 31B IT vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Gemma 4 E2B IT vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- GLM-4.5-Air vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- GLM-5.3-Flash vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- GLM-5.3 vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- GLM-5.3 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- gpt-oss-120b vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- gpt-oss-120b vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- gpt-oss-20b vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- gpt-oss-20b vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Granite 4.2 30B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Granite 4.2 3B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Granite 4.2 8B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Hy-Memory-30B-A3B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Hy3 vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Hy3 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Inkling-Small vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Inkling-Small vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Inkling vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Inkling vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- InternVL3.5-GPT-OSS-20B-A4B-Preview vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Kimi K3 vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Kimi K3 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Kolibri-1 vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Kolibri-1 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Kronos vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Kronos vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Laguna M.1 vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Laguna M.1 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Laguna S 2.1 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- Laguna XS 2.1 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- LBS-27B vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- LBS-27B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- LFM2.5-2.6B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- LFM3-1.7B vs LFM3-Audio-2B
- LFM3-1.7B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs LFM3-Omni-2B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs LFM3-VL-2B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Ling-3.0-tiny
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Ling-3.1-flash-1019
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs MiniCPM-o 4.5
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs MiniCPM5-2B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs MiniMax-M2.5
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs MiniMax-M2.7
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Mistral Large 4
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Muse Glimmer 30B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs occamy-1.0
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Recursive Flint
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs SmolLM3-3B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- LFM3-Audio-2B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
- LFM3-Omni-2B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- LFM3-VL-2B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Ling-3.0-tiny vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Ling-3.1-flash-1019 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- MiMo-V2.6 Distill Qwen 9B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- MiniCPM-o 4.5 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- MiniCPM5-2B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- MiniMax-M2.5 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- MiniMax-M2.7 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Mistral Large 4 vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Muse Glimmer 30B vs Nanbeige4.3-33B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Bolt E4B 4GB
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 4B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs occamy-1.0
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Olmo 3 7B Think
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Ornith-1.5-122B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Ornith-1.5-397B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Ornith-1.5-9B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.5-0.8B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.5-2B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.5-4B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.5-9B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.6-27B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-VL-2B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-VL-32B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Qwopus3.8-27B-Flash-V2
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Recursive Flint
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Ripple-65B Preview
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs SmolLM3-3B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Spark-X2.6-4B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-27B
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Swift 1.5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs ThinkingCap (Qwen3.8 27B)
- Nanbeige4.3-33B vs Baidu Unlimited-OCR-2
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/lfm3-audio-2b-vs-nanbeige-4-3-33b.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/lfm3-audio-2b.json·/api/v1/tools/nanbeige-4-3-33b.json - From a terminal
anchor compare lfm3-audio-2b nanbeige-4-3-33b(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "lfm3-audio-2b", "b": "nanbeige-4-3-33b"}at/mcp, no key