Sign in

Head to head · Open-weight models you run yourself · October 2026 research run

MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B vs Qwen3.6-27B

Qwen3.6-27B scores 66.7 (B) on agent readiness against MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B's 61 (C), and leads in 0 of 4 scored categories. MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B leads on reach and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

Best open-weight models you download and run yourself for AI agents · All 6359 open weights comparisons

MiniCPM-V 4.7 1BOpenBMB · Open-weight model C61/100#76 of 160 open-weight models Qwen3.6-27BAlibaba (Qwen team) · Open-weight model B66.7/100#16 of 160 open-weight models

Which one, for what

MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B C

Best for Agents that need a cheap local model to read screenshots, photos and short video on a phone, a laptop or beside a bigger model

Ahead on

  • Reach, 95 against 90
  • Documentation and upkeep, 48 against 31

Watch for

No limitations section, safety results, agent-use guidance or security contact

Qwen3.6-27B B

Best for Agents that want an open coding and tool-calling model with vision on one 24 to 32 GB GPU or Mac, with plain licence terms.

No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.

Watch for

No safety results, prompt-injection guidance or security contact

Why the edge

Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.

Documentation and upkeep MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B +17

MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B 48

Model card 8, Intended use (image, multi-image and video understanding on device), architecture (early visual-token compression inside the vision encoder) and parameters (1B) are there. Training data 0, no description of the training data on the card. Last change 20, the last commit, on 30 October 2026, updated the card and removed an unused asset folder, eleven days before this check. Responsiveness 0, the repository has no discussions that aren't pull requests (two pull requests in all), so nobody has asked anything yet and the line reads as none answered, as settled in calibration. Version policy 10, MiniCPM-V 4.5 and 4.6 stay in their own repositories and the GitHub README dates each release. File health 10, Config, template and card agree on the architecture and the thinking switch, and no report waits without a reply, since there are no discussions. 8 + 0 + 20 + 0 + 10 + 10 = 48.

Qwen3.6-27B 31

Model card 11 of 20, intended use, architecture, parameters and context are there, but limitations, languages and a knowledge cut-off aren't. Training data 5, only a general family description without a cut-off, in the GitHub README. Last change 5, the files last changed on 24 April 2026, 191 days before this check, and Qwen's GitHub repository holds only a README and licence, so no reference code of Alibaba's changed later. Responsiveness 0, Qwen answered none of the 40 most recent questions and reports, recounted on 1 November. Version policy 5, earlier and later 27B models stay in their own repositories without dated notes. File health 5, the files agree with the card but template and tool-calling reports wait without a reply.

Reach MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B +5

MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B 95

Memory 30, OpenBMB's own IQ4_XS GGUF is 0.64 GB, 1.54 GB with the 0.90 GB vision projector, and 1.54 GB × 1.2 = 1.9 GB, which fits 16 GB with room to spare. Runtimes 25, MiniCPMV4_7ForConditionalGeneration in vLLM's registry at v0.33.0, the minicpmv4_7 model type in SGLang's minicpmv.py at v0.5.23, the minicpmv4_7 model in Transformers at v5.22.2, a MiniCPM-V 4.7 guide and conversion code in llama.cpp at b12242, and an openbmb/minicpm-v4.7:1b tag in OpenBMB's namespace on Ollama, read as the 35B-A3B listing's is. Builds 15, OpenBMB publishes AWQ, GPTQ and int4 safetensors builds and a GGUF repository from IQ3_XS to F16, so quantised builds at two precisions or more. Terms 15, Apache 2.0 in the card's metadata and as the LICENSE of OpenBMB's MiniCPM-V repository, an OSI licence. Download 10, gated is false on the main repository and on the GGUF, AWQ, GPTQ and int4 repositories, so the files download with no account or terms. Hosted 0, Hugging Face lists no inference provider for the model (an empty provider mapping on 10 November 2026), and no provider's own list was read. 30 + 25 + 15 + 15 + 10 + 0 = 95.

Qwen3.6-27B 90

Memory 25 of 30, Ollama's text-only 4-bit build is 17 GB and the vision build 18 GB, about 20 to 22 GB with a fifth added, which fits 24 GB. Runtimes 25, released versions of llama.cpp, Ollama, vLLM, SGLang, LM Studio and Transformers all run the qwen3_5 architecture. Builds 10 of 15, Alibaba's only quantised build is FP8. Terms 15, Apache 2.0 with nothing added. Download 10, neither repository is gated. Hosted 5, three inference providers are live on Hugging Face and Alibaba's Model Studio serves it per the card.

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runMiniCPM-V 4.7 1BQwen3.6-27BEdge
Capability35%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Reach25%259590MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B +5
Risk20%205555even
Agent interface10%107070even
Documentation and upkeep10%104831MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B +17
Negative events≤1500
TotalC 61/100B 66.7/100

Facts side by side

FactMiniCPM-V 4.7 1BQwen3.6-27B
KindOpen-weight modelOpen-weight model
VendorOpenBMBAlibaba (Qwen team)
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
Transports
AuthNoneNone
PricingFreeFree
x402nono
LicenceApache-2.0Apache-2.0
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtnono
Last release2026-10-302026-04-22
Terms last updatedno document linkedno document linked
Privacy policy last updatedno document linkedno document linked
Agent reviewsnone3/5 (4)

How the scores have moved

MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B

No score change since it was listed.

Qwen3.6-27B

Verdicts

MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B

A vision-language cousin small enough for a phone, under plain Apache 2.0, that every runtime we count can load. The projector is bigger than the language model, so plan for about 2 GB. The card says nothing about limits or training data and doesn't show how a tool call comes back.

Qwen3.6-27B

A capable dense cousin for agentic coding and tool calls with images and video in, running in every major runtime. Ollama's 4-bit build needs about 22 GB, and three providers host it. The main risk is silence, with no safety results, no agent guidance, no answers in its repository and Qwen3.8-27B now ahead of it.

Before you call either

MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B

  1. Start it with llama-server -hf openbmb/MiniCPM-V-4.7-1B-gguf:Q4_K_M --jinja, or ollama run openbmb/minicpm-v4.7:1b
  2. For image input in llama.cpp add mmproj-model-f16.gguf, or the smaller 4x projector
  3. The GGUF files at the repository root have thinking off. Use the files in thinking/ when you want the trace
  4. Use temperature 0.7, top_p 0.95 and top_k 100 in instruct mode, as the card recommends
  5. Check tool calls in your runtime first, since the card names no parser
  6. Validate JSON output yourself, since structured output isn't documented

Qwen3.6-27B

  1. Quickest start is ollama run qwen3.6:27b, about 18 GB of files with the vision projector
  2. Alibaba's FP8 build with the card's parsers is vllm serve Qwen/Qwen3.6-27B-FP8 --max-model-len 262144 --reasoning-parser qwen3 --enable-auto-tool-choice --tool-call-parser qwen3_coder, vllm 0.19.0 or later
  3. Use the qwen3_coder tool parser, the template writes calls as function and parameter blocks inside tool_call
  4. Thinking is on by default, pass "chat_template_kwargs": {"enable_thinking": false} for short tasks, and /think and /nothink aren't supported
  5. "preserve_thinking": true in chat_template_kwargs keeps earlier reasoning in context, which helps long agent sessions but grows the prompt
  6. Sampling per the card is temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95, top_k 20 when thinking, and temperature 0.7, top_p 0.8, presence_penalty 1.5 without
  7. Keep at least 128K of context if you rely on thinking, and turn on YaRN only beyond 262,144 tokens
  8. Validate any JSON it returns or use the runtime's guided decoding, since structured output isn't documented
  9. Qwen3.8-27B (listed as qwen3-8-27b) is the newer model at this size on the same runtimes

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B or Qwen3.6-27B?

Qwen3.6-27B scores 66.7 (B) on agent readiness against MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B's 61 (C), and leads in 0 of 4 scored categories. MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B leads on reach and documentation and upkeep.

Other comparisons with MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B or Qwen3.6-27B

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.

Get an auditSee a sample report