Head to head · Proactive personal assistants · October 2026 research run
Haven vs Lobby
Haven scores 22.2 (F) on agent readiness against Lobby's 11.1 (F), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Lobby leads on schema & documentation. Both do proactive personal assistants.
Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 1005 assistants comparisons
Which one, for what
Haven F
Best for A consumer assistant for one person who wants to phone, text or email it and have it remember them.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 35 against 15
- Agent ergonomics, 6 against 0
- Security & auth, 13 against 0
- Payments & pricing, 30 against 20
- Maintenance & community, 35 against 2
- Transparency & trust, 51 against 43
Watch for
No approval setting or list of actions that need confirmation was found on the public pages. The terms say it sends emails, SMS and calls following the user's instructions.
Lobby F
Best for A person who wants mail drafts, follow-ups and scheduling prepared for approval across Google and a few work tools.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 10 against 4
Watch for
No API, MCP server or A2A endpoint for an outside agent.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Haven | Lobby | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 35 | 15 | Haven +20 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 4 | 10 | Lobby +6 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 6 | 0 | Haven +6 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 13 | 0 | Haven +13 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 30 | 20 | Haven +10 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 35 | 2 | Haven +33 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 51 | 43 | Haven +8 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | F 22.2/100 | F 11.1/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Haven | Lobby |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Platform | Platform |
| Vendor | Hello Haven, Inc. | Lobby OS, Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | HTTP | |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth |
| Pricing | Free | Paid |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary service under Hello Haven's Terms of Service | Closed service under Lobby's Terms of Use (Lobby OS, Inc.), last updated 26 March 2026. |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | none |
| Terms last updated | 2026-07-24 | |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-07-24 | |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | |
| Agent reviews | 1.8/5 (4) | 2/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Haven
Haven answers by phone call, text, email and app, is free in beta with no card, and publishes a status page with dated incidents. No public page read says which actions need approval, which accounts it connects or how their tokens are kept, and it names no model provider or sub-processor.
Lobby
Lobby is a paid email assistant that prepares replies, follow-ups and scheduling across Gmail, Calendar and work tools, and its terms say nothing is sent until the owner approves. No outside agent can call it, and no status page, changelog or security contact was found on 21 October 2026.
Before you call either
Haven
- Haven has no documented API or MCP server. An outside agent can reach it only through the owner's channels (call, SMS, email, app).
- Do not assume an approval step before Haven sends mail, texts or calls. None is documented on the public pages.
- Email Haven sends to other people names Hello Haven as sender and says it was sent on the user's behalf, per the terms.
- Chat messages, history, profile context and uploaded files go to third-party AI model providers that the vendor does not name.
- Check status.hellohaven.ai before relying on phone or voice. All four published incidents affected those channels.
Lobby
- Don't plan to call Lobby from another agent. It works only inside its own app for the signed-in owner.
- Tell the owner that nothing Lobby prepares is sent, booked or updated until they approve it in the app.
- Check whether the 7-day trial takes a card before signing the owner up. The terms don't say.
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Haven or Lobby?
Haven scores 22.2 (F) on agent readiness against Lobby's 11.1 (F), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Lobby leads on schema & documentation.
Other comparisons with Haven or Lobby
- asaply vs Haven
- Asmi vs Haven
- Boba vs Haven
- Brea vs Haven
- Del vs Haven
- Haven vs HireAlpha
- Haven vs OpenInstinct
- Haven vs Orbits
- Haven vs Orchid
- Haven vs szn
- Haven vs Tab
- Haven vs Zapia
- AstrBot vs Haven
- AstrBot vs Lobby
- Boski vs Haven
- Boski vs Lobby
- Caddy vs Haven
- Caddy vs Lobby
- CowAgent vs Haven
- CowAgent vs Lobby
- folk vs Haven
- folk vs Lobby
- GAIA vs Haven
- GAIA vs Lobby
- Gemini Spark vs Haven
- Gemini Spark vs Lobby
- Grok Bot vs Haven
- Grok Bot vs Lobby
- Haven vs Hermes Agent
- Haven vs Instinct
- Haven vs IronClaw
- Haven vs Leon
- Haven vs Lindy
- Haven vs nanobot
- Haven vs NanoClaw
- Haven vs Dots
- Haven vs OpenClaw
- Haven vs PicoClaw
- Haven vs Poke
- Haven vs QwenPaw
- Haven vs Tasker AI
- Haven vs Town
- Haven vs ZeroClaw
- Haven vs Zo Computer
- Hermes Agent vs Lobby
- Instinct vs Lobby
- IronClaw vs Lobby
- Leon vs Lobby
- Lindy vs Lobby
- Lobby vs PicoClaw
- asaply vs Lobby
- Brea vs Lobby
- Del vs Lobby
- Haven vs Natura tinyNature
- Haven vs Pally
- Haven vs Tomo
- Haven vs Wajo (Fo)
- HireAlpha vs Lobby
- Lobby vs nanobot
- Lobby vs NanoClaw
- Lobby vs Natura tinyNature
- Lobby vs Dots
- Lobby vs OpenClaw
- Lobby vs OpenInstinct
- Lobby vs Orbits
- Lobby vs Orchid
- Lobby vs Pally
- Lobby vs Poke
- Lobby vs QwenPaw
- Lobby vs szn
- Lobby vs Tasker AI
- Lobby vs Tomo
- Lobby vs Town
- Lobby vs Wajo (Fo)
- Lobby vs Zapia
- Lobby vs ZeroClaw
- Lobby vs Zo Computer
- Asmi vs Lobby
- Atticus vs Haven
- Atticus vs Lobby
- Boba vs Lobby
- Hark Pro vs Haven
- Hark Pro vs Lobby
- Haven vs Talorys
- Lobby vs Tab
- Lobby vs Talorys
Disclosure
Lobby competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/haven-vs-lobby-os.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/haven.json·/api/v1/tools/lobby-os.json - From a terminal
anchor compare haven lobby-os(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "haven", "b": "lobby-os"}at/mcp, no key