Head to head · Assistants that act in your accounts · October 2026 research run
Lobby vs Skydive
Skydive scores 52.1 (D) on agent readiness against Lobby's 11.2 (F), and leads in every scored category. Both do assistants that act in your accounts.
Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 1245 assistants comparisons
Which one, for what
Lobby F
Best for A person who wants mail drafts, follow-ups and scheduling prepared for approval across Google and a few work tools.
Also in its favour
- No incidents deducted, where Skydive loses 5 points for them
Watch for
No API, MCP server or A2A endpoint for an outside agent.
Skydive D
Best for A person or team who wants hosted agents with their own cloud computers, memory and connected apps, reachable in Slack, email, text and a CLI, and who can drive them from scripts through the CLI.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 41 against 15
- Schema & documentation, 81 against 10
- Agent ergonomics, 59 against 0
- Security & auth, 59 against 0
- Payments & pricing, 35 against 20
- Maintenance & community, 56 against 2
- Transparency & trust, 75 against 45
Also in its favour
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
- Free to start without a card
Watch for
The API has no operation for sending an agent a task. That runs through the CLI's chat -p, outside the OpenAPI contract.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Lobby | Skydive | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 15 | 41 | Skydive +26 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 10 | 81 | Skydive +71 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 0 | 59 | Skydive +59 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 0 | 59 | Skydive +59 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 20 | 35 | Skydive +15 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 2 | 56 | Skydive +54 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 45 | 75 | Skydive +30 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -5 | |
| Total | F 11.2/100 | D 52.1/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Lobby | Skydive |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Platform | Platform |
| Vendor | Lobby OS, Inc. | Create, Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | https://api.skydive.com/v1 |
| Transports | HTTP | |
| Auth | OAuth | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Paid | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Closed service under Lobby's Terms of Use (Lobby OS, Inc.), last updated 26 March 2026. | Closed service under the Skydive Terms of Service (Create, Inc.), effective 29 July 2026. The skydive-cli npm package is published under the MIT licence. |
| Read-only variant documented | no | yes |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | none | 2026-08-26 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-03-26 | couldn't be read |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-03-26 | couldn't be read |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Popularity | none | 5.5k npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | 2/5 (4) | none |
Verdicts
Lobby
Lobby is a paid email assistant that prepares replies, follow-ups and scheduling across Gmail, Calendar and work tools, and its terms say nothing is sent until the owner approves. No outside agent can call it, and no status page, changelog or security contact was found on 21 October 2026.
Skydive
Skydive publishes an OpenAPI 3.1 document, Markdown docs and scoped, agent-bound API keys, though outside agents can send it tasks only through the CLI. Its status page records several major incidents, including a 25-hour Agent Hosting outage, and its home and pricing pages say data is never used for training while the privacy policy turns training on by default.
Before you call either
Lobby
- Don't plan to call Lobby from another agent. It works only inside its own app for the signed-in owner.
- Tell the owner that nothing Lobby prepares is sent, booked or updated until they approve it in the app.
- Check whether the 7-day trial takes a card before signing the owner up. The terms don't say.
Skydive
- Send tasks with
skydive chat -p "..." --agent <id> --jsonand pass--conversation <id>from the JSON to keep context. The REST API can't send a task. - Don't retry
chat -por a create blindly after a timeout. There's no idempotency key, so list agents or keys before retrying. - Ask the owner for an agent-bound
usekey when you only need to read. Account-leveleditkeys can create agents and mint keys. - Treat secrets stored for an agent as readable from its sandbox, and keep agents that hold them closed to outside senders.
- Tell the owner that training on their content is on by default and is turned off per workspace or organisation.
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Lobby or Skydive?
Skydive scores 52.1 (D) on agent readiness against Lobby's 11.2 (F), and leads in every scored category.
Other comparisons with Lobby or Skydive
- asaply vs Skydive
- Asmi vs Skydive
- Boba vs Skydive
- Brea vs Skydive
- Del vs Skydive
- HireAlpha vs Skydive
- OpenInstinct vs Skydive
- Orbits vs Skydive
- Orchid vs Skydive
- AstrBot vs Lobby
- AstrBot vs Skydive
- Boski vs Lobby
- Boski vs Skydive
- Caddy vs Lobby
- Caddy vs Skydive
- Claude Duet vs Lobby
- Claude Duet vs Skydive
- CowAgent vs Lobby
- CowAgent vs Skydive
- folk vs Lobby
- folk vs Skydive
- GAIA vs Lobby
- GAIA vs Skydive
- Gemini Spark vs Lobby
- Gemini Spark vs Skydive
- Grok Bot vs Lobby
- Grok Bot vs Skydive
- Haven vs Lobby
- Haven vs Skydive
- Hermes Agent vs Lobby
- Hermes Agent vs Skydive
- Instinct vs Lobby
- Instinct vs Skydive
- IronClaw vs Lobby
- IronClaw vs Skydive
- Leon vs Lobby
- Leon vs Skydive
- Lindy vs Lobby
- Lindy vs Skydive
- Lobby vs PicoClaw
- nanobot vs Skydive
- NanoClaw vs Skydive
- Dots vs Skydive
- OpenClaw vs Skydive
- OpenDuet vs Skydive
- PicoClaw vs Skydive
- Poke vs Skydive
- QwenPaw vs Skydive
- Asmi vs Lobby
- Atticus vs Lobby
- Atticus vs Skydive
- Boba vs Lobby
- DeepTutor vs Lobby
- DeepTutor vs Skydive
- Hark Pro vs Lobby
- Hark Pro vs Skydive
- LearnHarness vs Lobby
- LearnHarness vs Skydive
- Lobby vs Tab
- Lobby vs Talorys
- Skydive vs szn
- Skydive vs Tab
- Skydive vs Talorys
- Skydive vs Tasker AI
- Skydive vs Tomo
- Skydive vs Town
- Skydive vs Wajo (Fo)
- Skydive vs Zapia
- Skydive vs ZeroClaw
- Skydive vs Zo Computer
- asaply vs Lobby
- Brea vs Lobby
- Del vs Lobby
- HireAlpha vs Lobby
- Lobby vs nanobot
- Lobby vs NanoClaw
- Lobby vs Natura tinyNature
- Lobby vs Dots
- Lobby vs OpenClaw
- Lobby vs OpenDuet
- Lobby vs OpenInstinct
- Lobby vs Orbits
- Lobby vs Orchid
- Lobby vs Pally
- Lobby vs Poke
- Lobby vs QwenPaw
- Lobby vs szn
- Lobby vs Tasker AI
- Lobby vs Tomo
- Lobby vs Town
- Lobby vs Wajo (Fo)
- Lobby vs Zapia
- Lobby vs ZeroClaw
- Lobby vs Zo Computer
- Natura tinyNature vs Skydive
- Pally vs Skydive
Disclosure
Lobby competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.
Skydive competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/lobby-os-vs-skydive.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/lobby-os.json·/api/v1/tools/skydive.json - From a terminal
anchor compare lobby-os skydive(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "lobby-os", "b": "skydive"}at/mcp, no key