Head to head · Proactive personal assistants · October 2026 research run

CowAgent vs Skydive

CowAgent scores 58.7 (C) on agent readiness against Skydive's 52.1 (D), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Skydive leads on schema & documentation, security & auth and transparency & trust. Both do proactive personal assistants.

Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 1245 assistants comparisons

Which one, for what

CowAgent C

Best for One technical owner who wants an assistant on WeChat, Feishu, DingTalk, Telegram, Slack or Discord with memory in local files and a choice of Chinese and Western model providers.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 84 against 41
  • Payments & pricing, 60 against 35
  • Maintenance & community, 83 against 56

Also in its favour

  • Open source

Watch for

Source and Docker installs default to full-access, and no mode asks the owner before a shell command, a file send or an MCP call

Skydive D

Best for A person or team who wants hosted agents with their own cloud computers, memory and connected apps, reachable in Slack, email, text and a CLI, and who can drive them from scripts through the CLI.

Ahead on

  • Schema & documentation, 81 against 67
  • Security & auth, 59 against 43
  • Transparency & trust, 75 against 47

Also in its favour

  • A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install

Watch for

The API has no operation for sending an agent a task. That runs through the CLI's chat -p, outside the OpenAPI contract.

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runCowAgentSkydiveEdge
Reliability16%208441CowAgent +43
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.26781Skydive +14
Agent ergonomics13%16.25959even
Security & auth14%17.54359Skydive +16
Payments & pricing10%12.56035CowAgent +25
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.88356CowAgent +27
Transparency & trust7%8.84775Skydive +28
Negative events≤15-5-5
TotalC 58.7/100D 52.1/100

Facts side by side

FactCowAgentSkydive
KindAgent harnessPlatform
VendorzhayujieCreate, Inc.
Hosted endpointno (local only)https://api.skydive.com/v1
TransportsHTTPHTTP
AuthOAuth or keyOAuth or key
PricingFreeFreemium
x402nono
LicenceMITClosed service under the Skydive Terms of Service (Create, Inc.), effective 29 July 2026. The skydive-cli npm package is published under the MIT licence.
Read-only variant documentedyesyes
llms.txtyesyes
Last release2026-09-302026-08-26
Terms last updatedno document linkedcouldn't be read
Privacy policy last updatedno document linkedcouldn't be read
Customer content may train modelscouldn't be read
Terms restrict automated accesscouldn't be read
Terms restrict benchmarkingcouldn't be read
Terms or service can change without noticecouldn't be read
Arbitration or class-action waivercouldn't be read
Popularity47k stars5.5k npm/wk

Verdicts

CowAgent

MIT software with seven releases in 90 days, memory kept as plain files in the owner's workspace and three per-session permission modes. Source and Docker installs default to full-access, no action asks for approval, and an open report of 31 July 2026 says group members could reach the owner's files through the bot.

Skydive

Skydive publishes an OpenAPI 3.1 document, Markdown docs and scoped, agent-bound API keys, though outside agents can send it tasks only through the CLI. Its status page records several major incidents, including a 25-hour Agent Hosting outage, and its home and pricing pages say data is never used for training while the privacy policy turns training on by default.

Before you call either

CowAgent

  1. Set agent_permission_mode to workspace-write or read-only before connecting any channel. Source and Docker installs default to full-access
  2. Keep the bot out of group chats that include other people. Any member who mentions it reaches the same tools as the owner
  3. Set web_password before changing web_host to 0.0.0.0. The password is empty by default
  4. Set external_api_token to enable POST /v1/chat/completions, and send conversation_id to keep one session. The model field does not select a model
  5. Run it in a container for a hard boundary. The docs and the source both say the permission modes are not isolation

Skydive

  1. Send tasks with skydive chat -p "..." --agent <id> --json and pass --conversation <id> from the JSON to keep context. The REST API can't send a task.
  2. Don't retry chat -p or a create blindly after a timeout. There's no idempotency key, so list agents or keys before retrying.
  3. Ask the owner for an agent-bound use key when you only need to read. Account-level edit keys can create agents and mint keys.
  4. Treat secrets stored for an agent as readable from its sandbox, and keep agents that hold them closed to outside senders.
  5. Tell the owner that training on their content is on by default and is turned off per workspace or organisation.

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, CowAgent or Skydive?

CowAgent scores 58.7 (C) on agent readiness against Skydive's 52.1 (D), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Skydive leads on schema & documentation, security & auth and transparency & trust.

Are CowAgent and Skydive open source?

CowAgent is open source (MIT). No open-source release is listed for Skydive.

Other comparisons with CowAgent or Skydive

Disclosure

Skydive competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.