Head to head · Assistants reached by message · October 2026 research run
Orbits vs Skydive
Skydive scores 52.1 (D) on agent readiness against Orbits's 15.7 (F), and leads in every scored category. Both do assistants reached by message.
Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 1245 assistants comparisons
Which one, for what
Orbits F
Best for Families who want one shared assistant for calendars, lists, meals, chores and household email.
Also in its favour
- No incidents deducted, where Skydive loses 5 points for them
Watch for
No public agent API, as llms.txt states.
Skydive D
Best for A person or team who wants hosted agents with their own cloud computers, memory and connected apps, reachable in Slack, email, text and a CLI, and who can drive them from scripts through the CLI.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 41 against 15
- Schema & documentation, 81 against 10
- Agent ergonomics, 59 against 0
- Security & auth, 59 against 0
- Payments & pricing, 35 against 20
- Transparency & trust, 75 against 44
Also in its favour
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
- Free to start without a card
Watch for
The API has no operation for sending an agent a task. That runs through the CLI's chat -p, outside the OpenAPI contract.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Orbits | Skydive | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 15 | 41 | Skydive +26 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 10 | 81 | Skydive +71 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 0 | 59 | Skydive +59 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 0 | 59 | Skydive +59 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 20 | 35 | Skydive +15 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 54 | 56 | Skydive +2 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 44 | 75 | Skydive +31 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -5 | |
| Total | F 15.7/100 | D 52.1/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Orbits | Skydive |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Platform | Platform |
| Vendor | Nemus AI, Inc. | Create, Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | https://api.skydive.com/v1 |
| Transports | HTTP | |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Paid | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Closed service under the Orbits Terms of Service (Nemus AI, Inc.). | Closed service under the Skydive Terms of Service (Create, Inc.), effective 29 July 2026. The skydive-cli npm package is published under the MIT licence. |
| Read-only variant documented | no | yes |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-13 | 2026-08-26 |
| Terms last updated | no date given | couldn't be read |
| Privacy policy last updated | no date given | couldn't be read |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Popularity | none | 5.5k npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | 1.5/5 (4) | none |
Verdicts
Orbits
Orbits is a family household app whose assistant, Bit, runs shared calendars, lists and meals, reads household email and places restaurant calls after approval, with iOS releases every week or two. No outside agent can call it, prices appear only as App Store in-app purchases, and no status page, security contact or named subprocessors were found.
Skydive
Skydive publishes an OpenAPI 3.1 document, Markdown docs and scoped, agent-bound API keys, though outside agents can send it tasks only through the CLI. Its status page records several major incidents, including a 25-hour Agent Hosting outage, and its home and pricing pages say data is never used for training while the privacy policy turns training on by default.
Before you call either
Orbits
- Don't plan to call Orbits from another agent. llms.txt says no public agent API is offered.
- Tell the owner the assistant needs an Orbits subscription bought in the app, and that any trial appears only at purchase.
Skydive
- Send tasks with
skydive chat -p "..." --agent <id> --jsonand pass--conversation <id>from the JSON to keep context. The REST API can't send a task. - Don't retry
chat -por a create blindly after a timeout. There's no idempotency key, so list agents or keys before retrying. - Ask the owner for an agent-bound
usekey when you only need to read. Account-leveleditkeys can create agents and mint keys. - Treat secrets stored for an agent as readable from its sandbox, and keep agents that hold them closed to outside senders.
- Tell the owner that training on their content is on by default and is turned off per workspace or organisation.
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Orbits or Skydive?
Skydive scores 52.1 (D) on agent readiness against Orbits's 15.7 (F), and leads in every scored category.
Other comparisons with Orbits or Skydive
- asaply vs Orbits
- asaply vs Skydive
- Asmi vs Orbits
- Asmi vs Skydive
- AstrBot vs Orbits
- Boba vs Orbits
- Boba vs Skydive
- Boski vs Orbits
- Brea vs Orbits
- Brea vs Skydive
- Caddy vs Orbits
- CowAgent vs Orbits
- Del vs Orbits
- Del vs Skydive
- folk vs Orbits
- GAIA vs Orbits
- Grok Bot vs Orbits
- Haven vs Orbits
- Hermes Agent vs Orbits
- HireAlpha vs Orbits
- HireAlpha vs Skydive
- Instinct vs Orbits
- IronClaw vs Orbits
- Lindy vs Orbits
- nanobot vs Orbits
- NanoClaw vs Orbits
- Dots vs Orbits
- OpenClaw vs Orbits
- OpenDuet vs Orbits
- OpenInstinct vs Orbits
- OpenInstinct vs Skydive
- Orbits vs Orchid
- Orbits vs Pally
- Orbits vs PicoClaw
- Orbits vs Poke
- Orbits vs QwenPaw
- Orbits vs szn
- Orbits vs Tab
- Orbits vs Tasker AI
- Orbits vs Tomo
- Orbits vs Town
- Orbits vs Zapia
- Orbits vs ZeroClaw
- Orbits vs Zo Computer
- Orchid vs Skydive
- AstrBot vs Skydive
- Boski vs Skydive
- Caddy vs Skydive
- Claude Duet vs Skydive
- CowAgent vs Skydive
- folk vs Skydive
- GAIA vs Skydive
- Gemini Spark vs Skydive
- Grok Bot vs Skydive
- Haven vs Skydive
- Hermes Agent vs Skydive
- Instinct vs Skydive
- IronClaw vs Skydive
- Leon vs Skydive
- Lindy vs Skydive
- nanobot vs Skydive
- NanoClaw vs Skydive
- Dots vs Skydive
- OpenClaw vs Skydive
- OpenDuet vs Skydive
- PicoClaw vs Skydive
- Poke vs Skydive
- QwenPaw vs Skydive
- Atticus vs Orbits
- Atticus vs Skydive
- DeepTutor vs Orbits
- DeepTutor vs Skydive
- Hark Pro vs Orbits
- Hark Pro vs Skydive
- LearnHarness vs Orbits
- LearnHarness vs Skydive
- Orbits vs Talorys
- Skydive vs szn
- Skydive vs Tab
- Skydive vs Talorys
- Skydive vs Tasker AI
- Skydive vs Tomo
- Skydive vs Town
- Skydive vs Wajo (Fo)
- Skydive vs Zapia
- Skydive vs ZeroClaw
- Skydive vs Zo Computer
- Claude Duet vs Orbits
- Gemini Spark vs Orbits
- Leon vs Orbits
- Lobby vs Orbits
- Lobby vs Skydive
- Natura tinyNature vs Orbits
- Natura tinyNature vs Skydive
- Orbits vs Wajo (Fo)
- Pally vs Skydive
Disclosure
Orbits competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.
Skydive competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/orbits-vs-skydive.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/orbits.json·/api/v1/tools/skydive.json - From a terminal
anchor compare orbits skydive(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "orbits", "b": "skydive"}at/mcp, no key