Head to head · Assistants reached by message · October 2026 research run

nanobot vs Orbits

nanobot scores 62.4 (B) on agent readiness against Orbits's 15.6 (F), and leads in every scored category. Both do assistants reached by message.

Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 834 assistants comparisons

Which one, for what

nanobot B

Best for A technical owner who wants an assistant on their own machine across many chat apps, with file-based memory and a free choice of model.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 70 against 15
  • Schema & documentation, 77 against 10
  • Agent ergonomics, 74 against 0
  • Security & auth, 63 against 0
  • Payments & pricing, 60 against 20
  • Maintenance & community, 82 against 54
  • Transparency & trust, 48 against 43

Also in its favour

  • No key needed to call it
  • Open source

Watch for

No per-action approval was found in the docs or source. The agent sends messages, runs shell commands and edits files without asking

Orbits F

Best for Families who want one shared assistant for calendars, lists, meals, chores and household email.

Also in its favour

  • No incidents deducted, where nanobot loses 6 points for them

Watch for

No public agent API, as llms.txt states.

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runnanobotOrbitsEdge
Reliability16%207015nanobot +55
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.27710nanobot +67
Agent ergonomics13%16.2740nanobot +74
Security & auth14%17.5630nanobot +63
Payments & pricing10%12.56020nanobot +40
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.88254nanobot +28
Transparency & trust7%8.84843nanobot +5
Negative events≤15-60
TotalB 62.4/100F 15.6/100

Facts side by side

FactnanobotOrbits
KindAgent harnessPlatform
VendorHKUDSNemus AI, Inc.
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
Transports
AuthNoneOAuth or key
PricingFreePaid
x402nono
LicenceMITClosed service under the Orbits Terms of Service (Nemus AI, Inc.).
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesyes
Last release2026-09-152026-10-13
Terms last updatedno document linked
Privacy policy last updatedno document linked
Customer content may train models
Terms restrict automated access
Terms restrict benchmarking
Terms or service can change without notice
Arbitration or class-action waiver
Popularity49k starsnone

Verdicts

nanobot

nanobot runs on the owner's machine under the MIT licence, with no telemetry found in its source and memory kept as files the owner can read and restore. No per-action approval step was found, and the shell sandbox and workspace restriction are off by default. Five security advisories were published between March and September 2026, all with fixes.

Orbits

Orbits is a family household app whose assistant, Bit, runs shared calendars, lists and meals, reads household email and places restaurant calls after approval, with iOS releases every week or two. No outside agent can call it, prices appear only as App Store in-app purchases, and no status page, security contact or named subprocessors were found.

Before you call either

nanobot

  1. Set tools.restrictToWorkspace to true and tools.exec.sandbox to bwrap or seatbelt before giving it real accounts. Both are off by default
  2. Run 0.3.0 or later. Earlier versions carry the published SSRF flaw in web fetch (GHSA-vc5v-6vwm-wf9m)
  3. Keep allowFrom narrow on every channel and never set ["*"] on Email, which has no pairing
  4. Write secrets as ${VAR} references in ~/.nanobot/config.json. Plain values are stored in clear text
  5. Use nanobot -m "..." for a one-shot run, and keep nanobot gateway running for channels, schedules and heartbeat

Orbits

  1. Don't plan to call Orbits from another agent. llms.txt says no public agent API is offered.
  2. Tell the owner the assistant needs an Orbits subscription bought in the app, and that any trial appears only at purchase.

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, nanobot or Orbits?

nanobot scores 62.4 (B) on agent readiness against Orbits's 15.6 (F), and leads in every scored category.

Are nanobot and Orbits open source?

nanobot is open source (MIT). No open-source release is listed for Orbits.

Other comparisons with nanobot or Orbits

Disclosure

Orbits competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.