Head to head · Assistant proactive · October 2026 research run
Leon vs nanobot
nanobot scores 62.4 (B) on agent readiness against Leon's 41 (E), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Leon leads on transparency & trust. Both do assistant proactive.
Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 190 assistants comparisons
Which one, for what
Leon E
Best for A developer who wants a self-hosted assistant with memory, computer use and a local model, and who will read the source.
Ahead on
- Transparency & trust, 60 against 48
Also in its favour
- Free to start without a card
- No incidents deducted, where nanobot loses 6 points for them
Watch for
No tagged release of the core since 1.0.0-beta.8 on 1 May 2023. The 2.0 Developer Preview is installed by cloning the develop branch
nanobot B
Best for A technical owner who wants an assistant on their own machine across many chat apps, with file-based memory and a free choice of model.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 70 against 32
- Schema & documentation, 77 against 33
- Agent ergonomics, 74 against 57
- Security & auth, 63 against 34
- Maintenance & community, 82 against 15
Watch for
No per-action approval was found in the docs or source. The agent sends messages, runs shell commands and edits files without asking
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Leon | nanobot | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 32 | 70 | nanobot +38 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 33 | 77 | nanobot +44 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 57 | 74 | nanobot +17 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 34 | 63 | nanobot +29 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 60 | 60 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 15 | 82 | nanobot +67 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 60 | 48 | Leon +12 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -6 | |
| Total | E 41/100 | B 62.4/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Leon | nanobot |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Vendor | Louis Grenard (Leon AI) | HKUDS |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | 2023-05-01 | 2026-09-15 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Popularity | 18k stars | 49k stars |
Verdicts
Leon
Connected-app credentials are encrypted per profile and the Gmail connection is read-only. The 2.0 Developer Preview has no tagged release, runs tools and a 30-minute proactive pulse with no approval step, listens on every network interface with client authentication off, and sends telemetry by default.
nanobot
nanobot runs on the owner's machine under the MIT licence, with no telemetry found in its source and memory kept as files the owner can read and restore. No per-action approval step was found, and the shell sandbox and workspace restriction are off by default. Five security advisories were published between March and September 2026, all with fixes.
Before you call either
Leon
- Clone the develop branch for 2.0.
npm install --global @leon-ai/cliand docs.getleon.ai install and describe the legacy 1.0 betas - Set
client_interface.auth.enabled: trueand aLEON_PROFILE_TOKENbefore the machine joins a shared network. The server binds 0.0.0.0 - Set
telemetry_enabled: falseandruntime.pulse_enabled: falsein the profileconfig.ymlfor an unattended or private run - Use
availability.tools.allowedto limit tools. Shell, file writes, computer use and browser control are otherwise available to the agent with no approval prompt - Back up
LEON_CONNECTIONS_ENCRYPTION_KEYfrom the profile.env. Without it the stored connections cannot be read
nanobot
- Set
tools.restrictToWorkspaceto true andtools.exec.sandboxtobwraporseatbeltbefore giving it real accounts. Both are off by default - Run 0.3.0 or later. Earlier versions carry the published SSRF flaw in web fetch (GHSA-vc5v-6vwm-wf9m)
- Keep
allowFromnarrow on every channel and never set["*"]on Email, which has no pairing - Write secrets as
${VAR}references in~/.nanobot/config.json. Plain values are stored in clear text - Use
nanobot -m "..."for a one-shot run, and keepnanobot gatewayrunning for channels, schedules and heartbeat
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Leon or nanobot?
nanobot scores 62.4 (B) on agent readiness against Leon's 41 (E), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Leon leads on transparency & trust.
Are Leon and nanobot open source?
Yes. Leon is open source (MIT). nanobot is open source (MIT).
Other comparisons with Leon or nanobot
- AstrBot vs Leon
- AstrBot vs nanobot
- CowAgent vs Leon
- CowAgent vs nanobot
- GAIA vs Leon
- GAIA vs nanobot
- Gemini Spark vs Leon
- Gemini Spark vs nanobot
- Grok Bot vs Leon
- Grok Bot vs nanobot
- Haven vs Leon
- Haven vs nanobot
- Hermes Agent vs Leon
- Hermes Agent vs nanobot
- Instinct vs Leon
- Instinct vs nanobot
- IronClaw vs Leon
- IronClaw vs nanobot
- Leon vs Lindy
- Leon vs NanoClaw
- Leon vs Dots
- Leon vs OpenClaw
- Leon vs PicoClaw
- Leon vs Poke
- Leon vs QwenPaw
- Leon vs ZeroClaw
- Leon vs Zo Computer
- Lindy vs nanobot
- nanobot vs NanoClaw
- nanobot vs Dots
- nanobot vs OpenClaw
- nanobot vs PicoClaw
- nanobot vs Poke
- nanobot vs QwenPaw
- nanobot vs ZeroClaw
- nanobot vs Zo Computer
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/leon-vs-nanobot.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/leon.json·/api/v1/tools/nanobot.json - From a terminal
anchor compare leon nanobot(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "leon", "b": "nanobot"}at/mcp, no key