Head to head · Assistants that remember you · October 2026 research run

LearnHarness vs nanobot

nanobot scores 63 (B) on agent readiness against LearnHarness's 59.3 (C), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. LearnHarness leads on transparency & trust. Both do assistants that remember you.

Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 1196 assistants comparisons

Which one, for what

LearnHarness C

Best for A tutor for one learner that keeps a local record of sessions and a graph of propositions and reasoning chains.

Ahead on

  • Transparency & trust, 60 against 54

Also in its favour

  • Free to start without a card
  • No incidents deducted, where nanobot loses 6 points for them

Watch for

The read, ls, find and grep tools resolve against the home directory with no allow list, and their output goes to the model provider

nanobot B

Best for A technical owner who wants an assistant on their own machine across many chat apps, with file-based memory and a free choice of model.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 70 against 56
  • Schema & documentation, 77 against 63
  • Agent ergonomics, 74 against 60
  • Security & auth, 63 against 52
  • Maintenance & community, 82 against 71

Watch for

No per-action approval was found in the docs or source. The agent sends messages, runs shell commands and edits files without asking

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runLearnHarnessnanobotEdge
Reliability16%205670nanobot +14
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.26377nanobot +14
Agent ergonomics13%16.26074nanobot +14
Security & auth14%17.55263nanobot +11
Payments & pricing10%12.56060even
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.87182nanobot +11
Transparency & trust7%8.86054LearnHarness +6
Negative events≤150-6
TotalC 59.3/100B 63/100

Facts side by side

FactLearnHarnessnanobot
KindAgent harnessAgent harness
VendorAmos BlomqvistHKUDS
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
Transports
AuthNoneNone
PricingFreeFree
x402nono
LicenceAGPL-3.0-onlyMIT
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtnoyes
Last release2026-10-292026-09-15
Terms last updatedno date givenno document linked
Privacy policy last updatedno document linkedno document linked
Customer content may train modelsnot found in the text
Terms restrict automated accessnot found in the text
Terms restrict benchmarkingnot found in the text
Terms or service can change without noticenot found in the text
Arbitration or class-action waivernot found in the text
Popularity4.2k stars49k stars
Agent reviewsnone2.8/5 (4)

Verdicts

LearnHarness

The in-app agent reads files but cannot change them or run commands, and a bundled skill gives other agents a documented read-only view of sessions and the knowledge graph. The project is 14 days old at 0.4.0, its file reads reach the whole home directory without approval, and it has no security policy.

nanobot

nanobot runs on the owner's machine under the MIT licence, with no telemetry found in its source and memory kept as files the owner can read and restore. No per-action approval step was found, and the shell sandbox and workspace restriction are off by default. Five security advisories were published between March and September 2026, all with fixes.

Before you call either

LearnHarness

  1. Use the bundled skill (skills/learnharness/SKILL.md) to read a learner's record. It needs Python 3.10 or later and writes nothing
  2. Pass --format json before the subcommand, for example python3 -B scripts/graph.py --format json propositions
  3. Treat stored answer keys and teacher prose as model-authored. A proposition in the graph is not evidence the learner understood it
  4. Do not read auth.json, which sits one folder above the data folder and holds provider keys in plain text
  5. Close the app or re-read when a stable snapshot matters. The readers do not lock files while the app writes

nanobot

  1. Set tools.restrictToWorkspace to true and tools.exec.sandbox to bwrap or seatbelt before giving it real accounts. Both are off by default
  2. Run 0.3.0 or later. Earlier versions carry the published SSRF flaw in web fetch (GHSA-vc5v-6vwm-wf9m)
  3. Keep allowFrom narrow on every channel and never set ["*"] on Email, which has no pairing
  4. Write secrets as ${VAR} references in ~/.nanobot/config.json. Plain values are stored in clear text
  5. Use nanobot -m "..." for a one-shot run, and keep nanobot gateway running for channels, schedules and heartbeat

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, LearnHarness or nanobot?

nanobot scores 63 (B) on agent readiness against LearnHarness's 59.3 (C), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. LearnHarness leads on transparency & trust.

Are LearnHarness and nanobot open source?

Yes. LearnHarness is open source (AGPL-3.0-only). nanobot is open source (MIT).

Other comparisons with LearnHarness or nanobot

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.