Head to head · Assistants that remember you · October 2026 research run
LearnHarness vs nanobot
nanobot scores 63 (B) on agent readiness against LearnHarness's 59.3 (C), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. LearnHarness leads on transparency & trust. Both do assistants that remember you.
Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 1196 assistants comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for A tutor for one learner that keeps a local record of sessions and a graph of propositions and reasoning chains.
Ahead on
- Transparency & trust, 60 against 54
Also in its favour
- Free to start without a card
- No incidents deducted, where nanobot loses 6 points for them
Watch for
The read, ls, find and grep tools resolve against the home directory with no allow list, and their output goes to the model provider
nanobot B
Best for A technical owner who wants an assistant on their own machine across many chat apps, with file-based memory and a free choice of model.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 70 against 56
- Schema & documentation, 77 against 63
- Agent ergonomics, 74 against 60
- Security & auth, 63 against 52
- Maintenance & community, 82 against 71
Watch for
No per-action approval was found in the docs or source. The agent sends messages, runs shell commands and edits files without asking
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | LearnHarness | nanobot | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 56 | 70 | nanobot +14 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 63 | 77 | nanobot +14 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 60 | 74 | nanobot +14 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 52 | 63 | nanobot +11 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 60 | 60 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 71 | 82 | nanobot +11 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 60 | 54 | LearnHarness +6 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -6 | |
| Total | C 59.3/100 | B 63/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | LearnHarness | nanobot |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Vendor | Amos Blomqvist | HKUDS |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | AGPL-3.0-only | MIT |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-29 | 2026-09-15 |
| Terms last updated | no date given | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | |
| Popularity | 4.2k stars | 49k stars |
| Agent reviews | none | 2.8/5 (4) |
Verdicts
LearnHarness
The in-app agent reads files but cannot change them or run commands, and a bundled skill gives other agents a documented read-only view of sessions and the knowledge graph. The project is 14 days old at 0.4.0, its file reads reach the whole home directory without approval, and it has no security policy.
nanobot
nanobot runs on the owner's machine under the MIT licence, with no telemetry found in its source and memory kept as files the owner can read and restore. No per-action approval step was found, and the shell sandbox and workspace restriction are off by default. Five security advisories were published between March and September 2026, all with fixes.
Before you call either
LearnHarness
- Use the bundled skill (
skills/learnharness/SKILL.md) to read a learner's record. It needs Python 3.10 or later and writes nothing - Pass
--format jsonbefore the subcommand, for examplepython3 -B scripts/graph.py --format json propositions - Treat stored answer keys and teacher prose as model-authored. A proposition in the graph is not evidence the learner understood it
- Do not read
auth.json, which sits one folder above the data folder and holds provider keys in plain text - Close the app or re-read when a stable snapshot matters. The readers do not lock files while the app writes
nanobot
- Set
tools.restrictToWorkspaceto true andtools.exec.sandboxtobwraporseatbeltbefore giving it real accounts. Both are off by default - Run 0.3.0 or later. Earlier versions carry the published SSRF flaw in web fetch (GHSA-vc5v-6vwm-wf9m)
- Keep
allowFromnarrow on every channel and never set["*"]on Email, which has no pairing - Write secrets as
${VAR}references in~/.nanobot/config.json. Plain values are stored in clear text - Use
nanobot -m "..."for a one-shot run, and keepnanobot gatewayrunning for channels, schedules and heartbeat
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, LearnHarness or nanobot?
nanobot scores 63 (B) on agent readiness against LearnHarness's 59.3 (C), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. LearnHarness leads on transparency & trust.
Are LearnHarness and nanobot open source?
Yes. LearnHarness is open source (AGPL-3.0-only). nanobot is open source (MIT).
Other comparisons with LearnHarness or nanobot
- asaply vs nanobot
- Asmi vs nanobot
- Boba vs nanobot
- Brea vs nanobot
- Del vs nanobot
- HireAlpha vs nanobot
- nanobot vs OpenInstinct
- nanobot vs Orbits
- nanobot vs Orchid
- nanobot vs szn
- nanobot vs Tab
- nanobot vs Zapia
- AstrBot vs nanobot
- Boski vs nanobot
- Caddy vs nanobot
- Claude Duet vs nanobot
- CowAgent vs nanobot
- folk vs nanobot
- GAIA vs nanobot
- Gemini Spark vs nanobot
- Grok Bot vs nanobot
- Haven vs nanobot
- Hermes Agent vs nanobot
- Instinct vs nanobot
- IronClaw vs nanobot
- Leon vs nanobot
- Lindy vs nanobot
- nanobot vs NanoClaw
- nanobot vs Dots
- nanobot vs OpenClaw
- nanobot vs OpenDuet
- nanobot vs PicoClaw
- nanobot vs Poke
- nanobot vs QwenPaw
- nanobot vs Tasker AI
- nanobot vs Town
- nanobot vs ZeroClaw
- nanobot vs Zo Computer
- asaply vs LearnHarness
- Asmi vs LearnHarness
- Atticus vs LearnHarness
- Atticus vs nanobot
- Boba vs LearnHarness
- Boski vs LearnHarness
- Brea vs LearnHarness
- Caddy vs LearnHarness
- Claude Duet vs LearnHarness
- CowAgent vs LearnHarness
- DeepTutor vs LearnHarness
- DeepTutor vs nanobot
- Del vs LearnHarness
- folk vs LearnHarness
- GAIA vs LearnHarness
- Gemini Spark vs LearnHarness
- Grok Bot vs LearnHarness
- Hark Pro vs LearnHarness
- Hark Pro vs nanobot
- Haven vs LearnHarness
- Hermes Agent vs LearnHarness
- HireAlpha vs LearnHarness
- Instinct vs LearnHarness
- IronClaw vs LearnHarness
- LearnHarness vs Leon
- LearnHarness vs Lindy
- LearnHarness vs Lobby
- LearnHarness vs NanoClaw
- LearnHarness vs Natura tinyNature
- LearnHarness vs Dots
- LearnHarness vs OpenClaw
- LearnHarness vs OpenDuet
- LearnHarness vs OpenInstinct
- LearnHarness vs Orbits
- LearnHarness vs Orchid
- LearnHarness vs Pally
- LearnHarness vs PicoClaw
- LearnHarness vs Poke
- LearnHarness vs QwenPaw
- LearnHarness vs szn
- LearnHarness vs Tab
- LearnHarness vs Talorys
- LearnHarness vs Tasker AI
- LearnHarness vs Tomo
- LearnHarness vs Town
- LearnHarness vs Wajo (Fo)
- LearnHarness vs Zapia
- LearnHarness vs ZeroClaw
- LearnHarness vs Zo Computer
- nanobot vs Talorys
- Lobby vs nanobot
- nanobot vs Natura tinyNature
- nanobot vs Pally
- nanobot vs Tomo
- nanobot vs Wajo (Fo)
- AstrBot vs LearnHarness
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/learnharness-vs-nanobot.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/learnharness.json·/api/v1/tools/nanobot.json - From a terminal
anchor compare learnharness nanobot(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "learnharness", "b": "nanobot"}at/mcp, no key