Head to head · Assistants that remember you · October 2026 research run
Asmi vs LearnHarness
LearnHarness scores 59.3 (C) on agent readiness against Asmi's 33.2 (F), and leads in every scored category. Both do assistants that remember you.
Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 1196 assistants comparisons
Which one, for what
Asmi F
Best for An agent that needs phone calls, texts and emails to businesses done for its owner.
Also in its favour
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
Watch for
Tool JSON Schemas and annotations can't be read before OAuth (unauthenticated initialize returns 401).
Best for A tutor for one learner that keeps a local record of sessions and a graph of propositions and reasoning chains.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 56 against 30
- Schema & documentation, 63 against 20
- Agent ergonomics, 60 against 43
- Payments & pricing, 60 against 30
- Maintenance & community, 71 against 3
- Transparency & trust, 60 against 50
Also in its favour
- No key needed to call it
- Free to start without a card
- Open source
Watch for
The read, ls, find and grep tools resolve against the home directory with no allow list, and their output goes to the model provider
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Asmi | LearnHarness | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 30 | 56 | LearnHarness +26 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 20 | 63 | LearnHarness +43 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 43 | 60 | LearnHarness +17 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 49 | 52 | LearnHarness +3 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 30 | 60 | LearnHarness +30 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 3 | 71 | LearnHarness +68 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 50 | 60 | LearnHarness +10 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | F 33.2/100 | C 59.3/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Asmi | LearnHarness |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Platform | Agent harness |
| Vendor | Humint Labs, Inc. | Amos Blomqvist |
| Hosted endpoint | https://prod.asmiai.com/mcp/claude/ | no (local only) |
| Transports | Streamable HTTP | |
| Auth | OAuth | None |
| Pricing | Freemium | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Closed service under Asmi's Terms of Service (Humint Labs, Inc., a Delaware corporation, effective October 2026). | AGPL-3.0-only |
| Tools exposed | 12 | none |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | none | 2026-10-29 |
| Terms last updated | couldn't be read | no date given |
| Privacy policy last updated | couldn't be read | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | couldn't be read | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | couldn't be read | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | couldn't be read | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | couldn't be read | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | couldn't be read | not found in the text |
| Popularity | none | 4.2k stars |
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (4) | none |
Verdicts
Asmi
Asmi is a hosted errand service with a 12-tool MCP server for Claude, ChatGPT and Muse, using OAuth with separate scopes for tracking tasks and for contacting people. Tool schemas sit behind sign-in, the outreach scope is ticked by default, and no status page, changelog or security contact was found.
LearnHarness
The in-app agent reads files but cannot change them or run commands, and a bundled skill gives other agents a documented read-only view of sessions and the knowledge graph. The project is 14 days old at 0.4.0, its file reads reach the whole home directory without approval, and it has no security policy.
Before you call either
Asmi
- Use the endpoint for your own client (/mcp/claude/, /mcp/openai/ or /mcp/meta/). A token from another client gets 403.
- Call discover_search before execute_start, then poll execute_status with the task id instead of starting the task again.
- Answer Asmi's questions with execute_advance. Calls already placed can't be recalled by execute_cancel.
- Expect outreach_not_permitted if the owner unticked contact people. Ask them to reconnect rather than retrying.
- Check billing_status before starting a task, since each outreach task uses one of the month's quota.
LearnHarness
- Use the bundled skill (
skills/learnharness/SKILL.md) to read a learner's record. It needs Python 3.10 or later and writes nothing - Pass
--format jsonbefore the subcommand, for examplepython3 -B scripts/graph.py --format json propositions - Treat stored answer keys and teacher prose as model-authored. A proposition in the graph is not evidence the learner understood it
- Do not read
auth.json, which sits one folder above the data folder and holds provider keys in plain text - Close the app or re-read when a stable snapshot matters. The readers do not lock files while the app writes
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Asmi or LearnHarness?
LearnHarness scores 59.3 (C) on agent readiness against Asmi's 33.2 (F), and leads in every scored category.
Are Asmi and LearnHarness open source?
No open-source release is listed for Asmi. LearnHarness is open source (AGPL-3.0-only).
Other comparisons with Asmi or LearnHarness
- asaply vs Asmi
- Asmi vs AstrBot
- Asmi vs Boba
- Asmi vs Boski
- Asmi vs Brea
- Asmi vs Caddy
- Asmi vs CowAgent
- Asmi vs DeepTutor
- Asmi vs Del
- Asmi vs folk
- Asmi vs GAIA
- Asmi vs Grok Bot
- Asmi vs Haven
- Asmi vs Hermes Agent
- Asmi vs HireAlpha
- Asmi vs Instinct
- Asmi vs IronClaw
- Asmi vs Lindy
- Asmi vs nanobot
- Asmi vs NanoClaw
- Asmi vs Natura tinyNature
- Asmi vs Dots
- Asmi vs OpenClaw
- Asmi vs OpenDuet
- Asmi vs OpenInstinct
- Asmi vs Orbits
- Asmi vs Orchid
- Asmi vs Pally
- Asmi vs PicoClaw
- Asmi vs Poke
- Asmi vs QwenPaw
- Asmi vs szn
- Asmi vs Tab
- Asmi vs Tasker AI
- Asmi vs Tomo
- Asmi vs Town
- Asmi vs Zapia
- Asmi vs ZeroClaw
- Asmi vs Zo Computer
- asaply vs LearnHarness
- Asmi vs Atticus
- Asmi vs Claude Duet
- Asmi vs Gemini Spark
- Asmi vs Hark Pro
- Asmi vs Leon
- Asmi vs Lobby
- Asmi vs Talorys
- Asmi vs Wajo (Fo)
- Atticus vs LearnHarness
- Boba vs LearnHarness
- Boski vs LearnHarness
- Brea vs LearnHarness
- Caddy vs LearnHarness
- Claude Duet vs LearnHarness
- CowAgent vs LearnHarness
- DeepTutor vs LearnHarness
- Del vs LearnHarness
- folk vs LearnHarness
- GAIA vs LearnHarness
- Gemini Spark vs LearnHarness
- Grok Bot vs LearnHarness
- Hark Pro vs LearnHarness
- Haven vs LearnHarness
- Hermes Agent vs LearnHarness
- HireAlpha vs LearnHarness
- Instinct vs LearnHarness
- IronClaw vs LearnHarness
- LearnHarness vs Leon
- LearnHarness vs Lindy
- LearnHarness vs Lobby
- LearnHarness vs nanobot
- LearnHarness vs NanoClaw
- LearnHarness vs Natura tinyNature
- LearnHarness vs Dots
- LearnHarness vs OpenClaw
- LearnHarness vs OpenDuet
- LearnHarness vs OpenInstinct
- LearnHarness vs Orbits
- LearnHarness vs Orchid
- LearnHarness vs Pally
- LearnHarness vs PicoClaw
- LearnHarness vs Poke
- LearnHarness vs QwenPaw
- LearnHarness vs szn
- LearnHarness vs Tab
- LearnHarness vs Talorys
- LearnHarness vs Tasker AI
- LearnHarness vs Tomo
- LearnHarness vs Town
- LearnHarness vs Wajo (Fo)
- LearnHarness vs Zapia
- LearnHarness vs ZeroClaw
- LearnHarness vs Zo Computer
- AstrBot vs LearnHarness
Disclosure
Asmi competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/asmi-vs-learnharness.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/asmi.json·/api/v1/tools/learnharness.json - From a terminal
anchor compare asmi learnharness(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "asmi", "b": "learnharness"}at/mcp, no key