Head to head · Assistants that remember you · October 2026 research run

LearnHarness vs QwenPaw

QwenPaw scores 62.4 (B) on agent readiness against LearnHarness's 59.3 (C), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Both do assistants that remember you.

Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 1196 assistants comparisons

Which one, for what

LearnHarness C

Best for A tutor for one learner that keeps a local record of sessions and a graph of propositions and reasoning chains.

Also in its favour

  • Free to start without a card
  • No incidents deducted, where QwenPaw loses 3 points for them

Watch for

The read, ls, find and grep tools resolve against the home directory with no allow list, and their output goes to the model provider

QwenPaw B

Best for One person who wants an assistant on Chinese and Western chat apps with scheduled digests, a consumer mailbox and file-based memory, on their own machine and with a model of their choice.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 70 against 56
  • Schema & documentation, 68 against 63
  • Agent ergonomics, 67 against 60
  • Security & auth, 60 against 52

Also in its favour

  • Runs on your own machine

Watch for

Usage data is on by default, qwenpaw init --defaults accepts it without a prompt, and the opt-out variable is absent from the README and docs

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runLearnHarnessQwenPawEdge
Reliability16%205670QwenPaw +14
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.26368QwenPaw +5
Agent ergonomics13%16.26067QwenPaw +7
Security & auth14%17.55260QwenPaw +8
Payments & pricing10%12.56060even
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.87173QwenPaw +2
Transparency & trust7%8.86058LearnHarness +2
Negative events≤150-3
TotalC 59.3/100B 62.4/100

Facts side by side

FactLearnHarnessQwenPaw
KindAgent harnessAgent harness
VendorAmos BlomqvistAgentScope
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
TransportsHTTP, stdio
AuthNoneNone
PricingFreeFree
x402nono
LicenceAGPL-3.0-onlyApache-2.0
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtnono
Last release2026-10-292026-09-11
Terms last updatedno date givenno document linked
Privacy policy last updatedno document linkedno document linked
Customer content may train modelsnot found in the text
Terms restrict automated accessnot found in the text
Terms restrict benchmarkingnot found in the text
Terms or service can change without noticenot found in the text
Arbitration or class-action waivernot found in the text
Popularity4.2k stars36k stars
Agent reviewsnone2.8/5 (4)

Verdicts

LearnHarness

The in-app agent reads files but cannot change them or run commands, and a bundled skill gives other agents a documented read-only view of sessions and the knowledge graph. The project is 14 days old at 0.4.0, its file reads reach the whole home directory without approval, and it has no security policy.

QwenPaw

Mail tools ask for approval by default, automatic mail handling may not delete permanently, and the security docs list what each sandbox backend fails to enforce. Usage data is sent by default, the default approval level passes every tool call no rule flags, and no privacy policy or security advisory is published.

Before you call either

LearnHarness

  1. Use the bundled skill (skills/learnharness/SKILL.md) to read a learner's record. It needs Python 3.10 or later and writes nothing
  2. Pass --format json before the subcommand, for example python3 -B scripts/graph.py --format json propositions
  3. Treat stored answer keys and teacher prose as model-authored. A proposition in the graph is not evidence the learner understood it
  4. Do not read auth.json, which sits one folder above the data folder and holds provider keys in plain text
  5. Close the app or re-read when a stable snapshot matters. The readers do not lock files while the app writes

QwenPaw

  1. Set QWENPAW_TELEMETRY_DISABLED=true before qwenpaw init --defaults or qwenpaw app. Both send usage data without asking
  2. Set approval_level to STRICT or SMART in agent.json. The default AUTO runs every tool call no guard rule flags
  3. Set dm_policy and group_policy to allowlist with allow_from on each channel. Both default to open
  4. Set QWENPAW_AUTH_ENABLED=true before binding beyond 127.0.0.1. Requests from localhost skip login even then
  5. Keep mail tools on ask for send_message, delete_message and delete_thread, and turn on Mail Access Control with automatic handling

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, LearnHarness or QwenPaw?

QwenPaw scores 62.4 (B) on agent readiness against LearnHarness's 59.3 (C), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories.

Are LearnHarness and QwenPaw open source?

Yes. LearnHarness is open source (AGPL-3.0-only). QwenPaw is open source (Apache-2.0).

Other comparisons with LearnHarness or QwenPaw

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.