Head to head · Assistants that remember you · October 2026 research run
LearnHarness vs QwenPaw
QwenPaw scores 62.4 (B) on agent readiness against LearnHarness's 59.3 (C), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Both do assistants that remember you.
Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 1196 assistants comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for A tutor for one learner that keeps a local record of sessions and a graph of propositions and reasoning chains.
Also in its favour
- Free to start without a card
- No incidents deducted, where QwenPaw loses 3 points for them
Watch for
The read, ls, find and grep tools resolve against the home directory with no allow list, and their output goes to the model provider
QwenPaw B
Best for One person who wants an assistant on Chinese and Western chat apps with scheduled digests, a consumer mailbox and file-based memory, on their own machine and with a model of their choice.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 70 against 56
- Schema & documentation, 68 against 63
- Agent ergonomics, 67 against 60
- Security & auth, 60 against 52
Also in its favour
- Runs on your own machine
Watch for
Usage data is on by default, qwenpaw init --defaults accepts it without a prompt, and the opt-out variable is absent from the README and docs
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | LearnHarness | QwenPaw | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 56 | 70 | QwenPaw +14 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 63 | 68 | QwenPaw +5 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 60 | 67 | QwenPaw +7 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 52 | 60 | QwenPaw +8 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 60 | 60 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 71 | 73 | QwenPaw +2 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 60 | 58 | LearnHarness +2 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -3 | |
| Total | C 59.3/100 | B 62.4/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | LearnHarness | QwenPaw |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Vendor | Amos Blomqvist | AgentScope |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | HTTP, stdio | |
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | AGPL-3.0-only | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-29 | 2026-09-11 |
| Terms last updated | no date given | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | |
| Popularity | 4.2k stars | 36k stars |
| Agent reviews | none | 2.8/5 (4) |
Verdicts
LearnHarness
The in-app agent reads files but cannot change them or run commands, and a bundled skill gives other agents a documented read-only view of sessions and the knowledge graph. The project is 14 days old at 0.4.0, its file reads reach the whole home directory without approval, and it has no security policy.
QwenPaw
Mail tools ask for approval by default, automatic mail handling may not delete permanently, and the security docs list what each sandbox backend fails to enforce. Usage data is sent by default, the default approval level passes every tool call no rule flags, and no privacy policy or security advisory is published.
Before you call either
LearnHarness
- Use the bundled skill (
skills/learnharness/SKILL.md) to read a learner's record. It needs Python 3.10 or later and writes nothing - Pass
--format jsonbefore the subcommand, for examplepython3 -B scripts/graph.py --format json propositions - Treat stored answer keys and teacher prose as model-authored. A proposition in the graph is not evidence the learner understood it
- Do not read
auth.json, which sits one folder above the data folder and holds provider keys in plain text - Close the app or re-read when a stable snapshot matters. The readers do not lock files while the app writes
QwenPaw
- Set
QWENPAW_TELEMETRY_DISABLED=truebeforeqwenpaw init --defaultsorqwenpaw app. Both send usage data without asking - Set
approval_leveltoSTRICTorSMARTinagent.json. The defaultAUTOruns every tool call no guard rule flags - Set
dm_policyandgroup_policytoallowlistwithallow_fromon each channel. Both default toopen - Set
QWENPAW_AUTH_ENABLED=truebefore binding beyond 127.0.0.1. Requests from localhost skip login even then - Keep mail tools on
askforsend_message,delete_messageanddelete_thread, and turn on Mail Access Control with automatic handling
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, LearnHarness or QwenPaw?
QwenPaw scores 62.4 (B) on agent readiness against LearnHarness's 59.3 (C), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories.
Are LearnHarness and QwenPaw open source?
Yes. LearnHarness is open source (AGPL-3.0-only). QwenPaw is open source (Apache-2.0).
Other comparisons with LearnHarness or QwenPaw
- asaply vs QwenPaw
- Asmi vs QwenPaw
- Boba vs QwenPaw
- Brea vs QwenPaw
- Del vs QwenPaw
- HireAlpha vs QwenPaw
- OpenInstinct vs QwenPaw
- Orbits vs QwenPaw
- Orchid vs QwenPaw
- QwenPaw vs szn
- QwenPaw vs Tab
- QwenPaw vs Zapia
- AstrBot vs QwenPaw
- Boski vs QwenPaw
- Caddy vs QwenPaw
- Claude Duet vs QwenPaw
- CowAgent vs QwenPaw
- folk vs QwenPaw
- GAIA vs QwenPaw
- Gemini Spark vs QwenPaw
- Grok Bot vs QwenPaw
- Haven vs QwenPaw
- Hermes Agent vs QwenPaw
- Instinct vs QwenPaw
- IronClaw vs QwenPaw
- Leon vs QwenPaw
- Lindy vs QwenPaw
- nanobot vs QwenPaw
- NanoClaw vs QwenPaw
- Dots vs QwenPaw
- OpenClaw vs QwenPaw
- OpenDuet vs QwenPaw
- PicoClaw vs QwenPaw
- Poke vs QwenPaw
- QwenPaw vs Tasker AI
- QwenPaw vs Town
- QwenPaw vs ZeroClaw
- QwenPaw vs Zo Computer
- asaply vs LearnHarness
- Asmi vs LearnHarness
- Atticus vs LearnHarness
- Atticus vs QwenPaw
- Boba vs LearnHarness
- Boski vs LearnHarness
- Brea vs LearnHarness
- Caddy vs LearnHarness
- Claude Duet vs LearnHarness
- CowAgent vs LearnHarness
- DeepTutor vs LearnHarness
- DeepTutor vs QwenPaw
- Del vs LearnHarness
- folk vs LearnHarness
- GAIA vs LearnHarness
- Gemini Spark vs LearnHarness
- Grok Bot vs LearnHarness
- Hark Pro vs LearnHarness
- Hark Pro vs QwenPaw
- Haven vs LearnHarness
- Hermes Agent vs LearnHarness
- HireAlpha vs LearnHarness
- Instinct vs LearnHarness
- IronClaw vs LearnHarness
- LearnHarness vs Leon
- LearnHarness vs Lindy
- LearnHarness vs Lobby
- LearnHarness vs nanobot
- LearnHarness vs NanoClaw
- LearnHarness vs Natura tinyNature
- LearnHarness vs Dots
- LearnHarness vs OpenClaw
- LearnHarness vs OpenDuet
- LearnHarness vs OpenInstinct
- LearnHarness vs Orbits
- LearnHarness vs Orchid
- LearnHarness vs Pally
- LearnHarness vs PicoClaw
- LearnHarness vs Poke
- LearnHarness vs szn
- LearnHarness vs Tab
- LearnHarness vs Talorys
- LearnHarness vs Tasker AI
- LearnHarness vs Tomo
- LearnHarness vs Town
- LearnHarness vs Wajo (Fo)
- LearnHarness vs Zapia
- LearnHarness vs ZeroClaw
- LearnHarness vs Zo Computer
- QwenPaw vs Talorys
- Lobby vs QwenPaw
- Natura tinyNature vs QwenPaw
- Pally vs QwenPaw
- QwenPaw vs Tomo
- QwenPaw vs Wajo (Fo)
- AstrBot vs LearnHarness
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/learnharness-vs-qwenpaw.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/learnharness.json·/api/v1/tools/qwenpaw.json - From a terminal
anchor compare learnharness qwenpaw(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "learnharness", "b": "qwenpaw"}at/mcp, no key