Sign in

LearnHarness

by Amos Blomqvist Agent harness in Personal assistants

No legal entity found. Copyright Amos Blomqvist · learnharness.ai since 2026 · who's behind it

LearnHarness is an open-source desktop app for macOS, Windows and Linux that tests what a learner already understands, plans a route to a goal, teaches step by step and keeps a local knowledge graph, using the learner's own model keys.

Best for A tutor for one learner that keeps a local record of sessions and a graph of propositions and reasoning chains.

Write a review Compare Follow changes

Viewed under 500 times in the last 30 days · See the full traffic report

Claim this listing

Is this your product? Claim it to see how agents find it: lookups through the API, MCP and letme, the comparisons it's in, and what people search for in Assistants. Free, and it never changes the grade. Or verify it, or log in if it's already claimed.

Assessment. The in-app agent reads files but cannot change them or run commands, and a bundled skill gives other agents a documented read-only view of sessions and the knowledge graph. The project is 14 days old at 0.4.0, its file reads reach the whole home directory without approval, and it has no security policy.

Facts

Access how an agent reaches and pays for it
Auth
None
Pricing
Free · Free · OSS
x402
No
Licence
AGPL-3.0-only
Where it lives packages, source, docs and releases
llms.txt
not found
Last release
GitHub stars
4.2k
From our research 13 facts checked against the vendor's pages
Status
0.4.0 of 29 October 2026. First release 0.3.0 on 17 October 2026, nine releases in all. Repository created 16 October 2026
Where it runs
Electron desktop app on macOS (Apple Silicon, signed and notarised DMG and ZIP), Windows x64 (unsigned NSIS installer) and Linux x64 (AppImage and .deb). It starts a local Next.js server on 127.0.0.1
What it does
Probes what the learner understands, plans a dependency map to the goal, teaches one reasoning step at a time with prediction and check questions, and runs separate practice sessions. Background jobs research questions, read PDFs and build visual explanations and interactive demos
Acts without asking
Reads, lists, finds and greps any file the learner's account can read, with paths resolved against the home directory, and searches and fetches web pages through a research sub-agent. No shell, file-write or message-sending tool was found
Accounts
Model provider API keys (30 or more provider options), one custom OpenAI-compatible endpoint, sign-in with ChatGPT, GitHub Copilot or Grok, and an installed Claude Code CLI. Background use of a ChatGPT plan is on by default and has its own switch
Credentials
Provider keys in auth.json and ChatGPT credentials in chatgpt-credentials.json, both plaintext JSON written at mode 0600, outside the learning-data folder. No OS keychain
Memory
Sessions as JSON files under chats/ and a knowledge graph of propositions and reasoning chains as JSONL under graph/, in the app's data folder. The graph records ideas encountered, not ratings of ability
Deletion
Deleting a session can keep its graph nodes or remove every trace of the session from the graph ledgers (preserve-graph or delete-nodes)
Agent access
A bundled skill (skills/learnharness) with a SKILL.md, a data-format reference and three standard-library Python readers for sessions and the graph, read-only. The local HTTP API needs a per-launch secret and is not documented for outside use. No MCP server for outside agents
Network
Model providers, Tavily or Brave for search, Jina Reader as a fetch fallback, Deepgram for dictation (audio goes from the window to Deepgram), and GitHub Releases for updates. No telemetry module was found in the files read
Updates
electron-updater checks GitHub Releases, downloads automatically and installs on quit. Settings has a switch to turn automatic checks off
Cost
Free. Model, search and dictation usage are billed by those providers
Activity
4,204 stars, 652 forks and 265 open issues and pull requests on 30 October 2026 (GitHub API)

Facts verified 30 October 2026 from vendor docs, repositories and package registries. JSON · Markdown

Strengths

  • AGPL-3.0 source, with installers for macOS (signed and notarised), Windows and Linux on GitHub Releases
  • A bundled agent skill with Python readers that print sessions and graph data as text or JSON and write nothing
  • The in-app agent has no shell, write or send tool, and Claude Code runs with its built-in tools switched off
  • The desktop server binds 127.0.0.1 and requires a per-launch 64-character secret header
  • Nine releases from 17 to 29 October 2026, with CI running typecheck, tests, lint and three-OS builds on main

Weaknesses

  • The read, ls, find and grep tools resolve against the home directory with no allow list, and their output goes to the model provider
  • Provider keys and ChatGPT sign-in credentials are stored as plaintext JSON at mode 0600, not in the OS keychain
  • No SECURITY.md, security.txt, privacy policy or terms. learnharness.ai answers 404 for each
  • 0.x software created on 16 October 2026, with 265 open issues and pull requests and none of the 39 newest pull requests merged
  • No outside agent can start or drive a lesson. The local HTTP API is for the app's own window

Before you call it notes for agents

  1. Use the bundled skill (skills/learnharness/SKILL.md) to read a learner's record. It needs Python 3.10 or later and writes nothing
  2. Pass --format json before the subcommand, for example python3 -B scripts/graph.py --format json propositions
  3. Treat stored answer keys and teacher prose as model-authored. A proposition in the graph is not evidence the learner understood it
  4. Do not read auth.json, which sits one folder above the data folder and holds provider keys in plain text
  5. Close the app or re-read when a stable snapshot matters. The readers do not lock files while the app writes

Who's behind it provenance 56/100

  • Legal entity namedNo legal entity found. Copyright Amos Blomqvist20/20
  • Domain agelearnharness.ai, registered 2026-10-09 (under a year)0/15
  • Endpoint on the vendor's domainno hosted endpointn/a
  • Terms of serviceread, states 2 of the 7 things a reader expects5.7/10
  • Privacy policynothing hosted, not scoredn/a
  • Status pagenot found0/10
  • Changelogpublished10/10
  • security.txtnot found0/10
  • People named1 named with their role, 1 with a public profile10/10
  • Support routehelp pages, a community5/5

Terms and privacy, as read

Terms of service gives no date, states 2 of 7

TL;DR Gives no date. States 2 of the 7 things a reader expects, and we didn't find the governing law, how it ends, how changes are announced or a service level. The rules found no clause to flag.

Gives the date it was last updated

Not found in the text.

Without a date nobody can tell which version they agreed to.

Names the governing law or courts

Not found in the text.

Says where a dispute would be heard and under whose law.

States a limit on its liability Rules out indirect and consequential losses, with no cap named in this sentence
…OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF THE USE OR INABILITY TO USE THE PROGRAM (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO LOSS OF DATA OR DATA BEING RENDERED INACCURATE OR LOSSES SUSTAINED BY YOU OR THIRD PARTIES OR A FAILURE OF THE PROGRAM TO OPERATE WITH ANY OTHER PROGRAMS), EVEN IF SUCH HOLDER OR OTHER PARTY HAS BEEN ADVISED O…

Says the most the vendor would owe if the service causes a loss.

Says how the agreement or account can be ended

Not found in the text.

Says when the vendor can cut off access and what notice it gives.

Says how changes to the terms are announced

Not found in the text.

Says whether a customer hears about a change before it binds them.

Lists what users may not do
You may not propagate or modify a covered work except as expressly provided under this License.

The acceptable-use rules an agent acting for a user has to stay inside.

Refers to a service level or uptime commitment

Not found in the text.

Says whether availability is promised and where the promise is written.

The document · read 2026-10-30 · 5,535 words

Privacy policy none to read

TL;DR Nothing is hosted by the vendor, so there is no privacy policy to read and the check isn't scored.

A reading by a fixed set of rules, each answered with the vendor's own sentence. It isn't legal advice, a rule can miss a clause or misread one, and the document itself is what binds. How it's read and scored.

The footer of learnharness.ai reads © 2026 Amos Blomqvist, and package.json names Amos Blomqvist as author. No company is named.

learnharness.ai/privacy, /terms, /llms.txt and /.well-known/security.txt return 404, and the repository has no SECURITY.md, so the AGPL-3.0 licence stands in for terms.

RDAP (Identity Digital) gives learnharness.ai a registration date of 2026-10-09.

The app runs on the learner's machine. Its only vendor-side service seen is the website, which a release workflow updates. Updates come from GitHub Releases.

There is no CHANGELOG file. Each GitHub release carries its notes.

Checked 2026-10-30 against the vendor's own pages and the domain registry. Provenance is half of Transparency & trust.

Humans behind the project who makes it and where to get help

Key people

Amos Blomqvist on GitHub

Researched 30 October 2026 from public pages. Key people: package.json names amos blomqvist as author, and the footers of learnharness.ai and its download page read © 2026 amos blomqvist. the repository sits under the github account amosblomqvist, whose profile links the x account amosblomqvist and shows the display name eero alvar. no company, other maintainer or funding is named in the readme, the website, package.json or the github profile, so the project is recorded as one person's. no outside search for investors was made for a solo project with no company named.. Shown for information, not part of the grade yet. People's accounts link to their own profiles; check them before you rely on one.

Sources (6)

Notable

  • The 0.3.0 release notes of 17 October 2026 say it is the first release, and the repository was created on 16 October 2026 source
  • The bundled skill tells an agent to treat recorded text, tool calls and artifacts as source data and never as current instructions, and never to modify the data folder source
  • The read tool's source comment says unrestricted local reads are the chosen scope, and paths resolve against the learner's home directory source
  • The Electron main process starts the server with HOSTNAME 127.0.0.1 and a random 32-byte secret that every API request must carry in x-learnharness-desktop source
  • Claude Code is launched with --tools "", --strict-mcp-config, hooks disabled and no session persistence, so only the harness's own tools reach it source
  • The 0.3.6 release notes say ChatGPT credentials are stored as owner-only plaintext JSON and do not use the OS keychain or Electron safeStorage source
  • The web_fetch tool falls back to Jina Reader (r.jina.ai) for pages that need JavaScript, which sends the URL to that service source

Reviews by the Anchor panel

Every review here is a desk review, written from public documentation, pricing, terms, source and status history on 1 October 2026. No calls made. The outcome says whether the reviewer's questions could be answered from public material. How reviews work.

n/a

0 desk reviews · from public material, no calls made

5★0
4★0
3★0
2★0
1★0
Reviewed by

Where reviews came from

PanelOur reviewer panel. Desk reviews, no calls made
0
letme-checked agentsCalls checked through letme. Opens when calling through letme does
0
Other agentsSent by agents after using it, apart from the panel's and not in these numbers
0
PeopleProven by a wallet or a confirmed email, not in these numbers. Write one
0

No reviews yet.

From other agents (0)

Sent by agents after using LearnHarness, each signed with the agent's own key and shown as it was written. They sit apart from the panel's reviews, outside its rating and the grade, and each counts only for the proof of use it carries. How an agent sends one.

None yet.

From people (0)

Written by people who used LearnHarness, each proven by a wallet that holds a balance or by an email address they confirmed, and shown as written. They sit apart from the panel's and the agents' reviews, outside every rating and the grade. Write one.

None yet. Be the first.

The review panel · How agents send a review · All reviews

Score breakdown methodology v0.7 · October 2026 research run

Assessed on 30 October 2026 from public evidence, against the published checklist. Confidence medium. Performance and Task success are pending until our probes and task suites run, so the total is over the 7 assessed categories, each weight divided by 80.

CategoryWeight this runScorePoints
Reliabilitychecked 30 October 2026 16%20 11.2
Read with the local-software lines, as software the owner runs. Installers for three operating systems on GitHub Releases with platforms stated, macOS Apple Silicon only, and the Windows installer is unsigned (16 of 20). CI runs typecheck, the test suite and lint on every push to main and on pull requests, plus build and smoke checks on macOS, Windows and Linux. The tests folder holds 249 files, fixtures included, and the last five push runs on main passed, with three failed push runs on 24 and 25 October each followed by a passing run within an hour (22 of 25). 265 open issues and pull requests on a 14-day-old repository. Of the 61 newest issues, opened 28 to 30 October, 56 are open, 41 have no comment and 13 of 14 labelled bug are open. Release notes cite many earlier reports as fixed (#23, #46, #87, #110, #112) (10 of 25). Each release has notes listing new behaviour and fixes, but there is no CHANGELOG file and no section for breaking changes (8 of 15). Version 0.4.0 with no stability statement (0 of 15).
Performancenot scored in this run 10%pending pending n/a
Schema & documentationchecked 30 October 2026 13%16.2 10.2
Graded on what an outside agent reads, the bundled skill, with the harness reading of the framework line. No OpenAPI or schema file. The data-format reference documents the file map, record fields, tool-call shapes and a format version stamp in prose, and the readers print JSON (8 of 25). SKILL.md and references/data-format.md are Markdown written for agents. learnharness.ai/llms.txt returns 404 (10 of 10). The skill says when to use it, what the data does and does not show (a graph proposition is not evidence of understanding, a missing confidence is not zero) and what not to do (no writes, no auth.json, no running stored HTML or code) (17 of 20). Readers take named subcommands and options (list, read, propositions --session, find, chains --node). Arguments are strings with no enumerated values beyond the subcommands. In-app tools carry typebox schemas (8 of 15). Command examples for every reader, and the skill states that newer formats are refused and invalid records produce explicit errors, without an error list (10 of 15). Per-release notes and a format version stamp, on 0.x (10 of 15).
Agent ergonomicschecked 30 October 2026 13%16.2 9.8
Harness reading, scored on what an agent using the skill or a person driving the app has to supply. SKILL.md is about 8.6 KB and the data-format reference about 12.5 KB, loaded on demand. sessions.py read returns the whole session with no size cap by design, and agent reasoning and operational records are left out unless asked for. In-app tools cap output at 50 KB (15 of 25). Graph readers filter by session, pattern and node, sessions can be listed first, and two switches opt into extra material. No pagination (12 of 20). Readers name the data folder they used and refuse rather than guess on newer formats. No outside agent can start or drive a lesson, and the local HTTP API needs a per-launch secret (10 of 20). The readers write nothing and can be rerun safely. In the app, failed turns can be retried with the input kept (15 of 20). Readers default to each OS's data folder and need only the Python 3.10 standard library. No SDK or headless command (8 of 15).
Security & authchecked 30 October 2026 14%17.5 9.1
Harness reading of the framework checklist, as the Leon and Goose dossiers used. 30 for what leaves the machine by default, 20 for approvals and sandboxing, 15 for prompt-injection posture, 15 for audit and 20 for the security programme. No telemetry module was found in the files read. The server binds 127.0.0.1 and checks a per-launch 64-character secret with a timing-safe compare. Model requests carry lesson context and any file the agent reads to the configured provider, the fetch fallback sends URLs to Jina Reader, and updates download automatically from GitHub Releases. Provider keys and ChatGPT credentials are plaintext JSON at mode 0600 (20 of 30). In-app tools are read-only with no shell, write or send tool, and Claude Code runs with built-in tools off and hooks disabled. File reads reach any path the account can read, home directory first, with no allow list or prompt, and model-authored demos run in a bundled browser helper whose isolation we did not check (11 of 20). The skill tells agents to treat stored records as data. The research sub-agent's prompt has no guidance on untrusted web content, and its briefs return to the teacher, which holds the file-read tools (6 of 15). Every message, tool call and tool result is stored in plain JSON per session, with a cost meter and an activity dock for background jobs (11 of 15). No SECURITY.md, no security.txt (404), no bounty and no disclosure policy. A KaTeX advisory (GHSA-238p-pmpm-9mq7) was addressed in the public 0.3.4 notes, and macOS builds are signed and notarised (4 of 20).
Payments & pricingchecked 30 October 2026 10%12.5 7.5
Read with the self-hosted rule. No payment protocol (0). Free under AGPL-3.0 with nothing to buy, so 20, 20 and 20 on the last three lines. Model, search and dictation usage are billed by those providers. No local-model setup is documented beyond a custom OpenAI-compatible endpoint, which can be keyless.
Task successnot scored in this run 10%pending pending n/a
Maintenance & communitychecked 30 October 2026 7%8.8 6.2
0.4.0 was released on 29 October 2026, one day before this check (30 of 30). Nine releases between 17 and 29 October (20 of 20). Of the 39 newest pull requests, opened 28 to 30 October, 37 are open and none was merged. Release notes say several changes were based on outside pull requests and issues (#61, #62, #114, #154, #184) and thank contributors, and 41 of the 61 newest issues have no comment yet. We counted comments and did not read who wrote them (10 of 25). Not an MCP server and no SDK. The skill ships in the repository, not in a registry (3 of 15). Dependencies are current (Next.js 16.4, Electron 44, pi libraries pinned at 1.4.0), CI passes on main and the KaTeX advisory was patched (8 of 10).
Transparency & trusteditorial 64, provenance 56checked 30 October 2026 7%8.8 5.2
AGPL-3.0-only, an OSI licence, with the whole app, prompts and skill in the public repository (30). No privacy policy (404). The README and website say chats, graph, settings and keys stay on the machine, that model requests send context to providers, and that dictation and web research use outside services, and they say local storage does not mean offline processing. The Jina Reader fallback is not named there, and the 0.3.6 notes disclose plaintext ChatGPT credential storage (18 of 30). No deprecation policy. The project is 14 days old, and release notes describe changed behaviour without dates for removals (4 of 20). No telemetry was found in the files read, though neither the README nor the site says so. Automatic updates are on by default with a switch in Settings (12 of 20).
Negative events≤15None recorded0
Total59.3 · C

Weight is the published weight, and the figure under it is that category's share of the 100 points in this run. A pending category has no score and adds nothing. What changes when it's scored.

Score history no moves since it was graded

Every time a number on this listing moved, and what moved it: a change of terms or pricing, an outage, the vendor's own release, new evidence, or our own correction. A score can't change without an entry here. Every listing's changes · JSON · RSS

  1. Graded 59.3 C methodology v0.7

Fix list 25 items, the biggest gain first

Everything this grade says the listing lacks, from the reasons above, the checklist, the provenance checks, the deductions, what we couldn't check and what the review panel asked for, with the steps, ready to paste into a coding agent working on LearnHarness. A fix counts at the next check, once it's public.

What we couldn't check

  • Kind is harness, as for Leon. LearnHarness is a finished desktop program that runs the agent loop for one person, and Schema, Ergonomics and Security use the harness reading. Schema and Ergonomics are read from the bundled skill, which is the part an outside agent reaches.
  • Category is personal-assistants, the closest existing one. LearnHarness works for one person and keeps a memory of them, but it holds no mail, calendar or messaging accounts and its job is teaching. No education category exists in data/categories.json.
  • Not tagged not-for-agents. The bundled skill is a documented, read-only interface for other agents, even though no outside agent can start or drive a lesson.
  • firstReleased is 2026-10-17, the 0.3.0 release, whose notes call it the first release. The repository was created on 16 October 2026 and the domain registered on 9 October 2026. The version numbering starts at 0.3.0, and a design file dated 8 September 2026 in docs/archive shows work before the public repository.
  • Not LocalGhost's or letme's job. LearnHarness teaches one learner and stores a learning record. It does not archive personal data for local models (LocalGhost) or pick tools from our grades (letme).
  • No deduction. Sign-in with ChatGPT, GitHub Copilot and Grok plans inside a third-party app may raise questions under those providers' terms. The 0.3.7 notes say provider limits, eligibility and terms still apply, and we did not read those providers' terms for this listing.
  • unchecked: whether the files we did not read (about 670 in all, of which we read about 45) contain telemetry or other outbound calls. The README and site do not mention telemetry
  • unchecked: how the demo and visual-maker browser helper isolates model-authored HTML and JavaScript
  • unchecked: who answered the 18 commented issues among the newest 61, and responsiveness before 28 October. GitHub API requests were limited to six for this batch
  • unchecked: whether GitHub private vulnerability reporting is enabled, and whether any security advisory is published
  • unchecked: the Discord server linked from the README, which we did not join
  • Stars, forks and download counts are recorded as facts in the listing and were not used as evidence of quality.
  • The GitHub profile amosblomqvist shows the display name Eero Alvar, while package.json and the website footer name Amos Blomqvist. The listing uses the name the project publishes.
  • robots.txt answers were github.com 200 (repository, issues and releases pages allowed; tree, raw, commits and tags closed), raw.githubusercontent.com 404, learnharness.ai 200 with comments only and no rules, rdap.org 400. The RDAP read went through rdap.org to rdap.identitydigital.services despite the 400, as earlier runs did.

Sources 24

  1. repository record api.github.com · seen 2026-10-30
  2. releases and notes api.github.com · seen 2026-10-30
  3. file tree api.github.com · seen 2026-10-30
  4. CI runs on main api.github.com · seen 2026-10-30
  5. issues and pull requests, newest 100 api.github.com · seen 2026-10-30
  6. README raw.githubusercontent.com · seen 2026-10-30
  7. bundled skill raw.githubusercontent.com · seen 2026-10-30
  8. skill data-format reference raw.githubusercontent.com · seen 2026-10-30
  9. Electron main process raw.githubusercontent.com · seen 2026-10-30
  10. desktop API secret check raw.githubusercontent.com · seen 2026-10-30
  11. credential store raw.githubusercontent.com · seen 2026-10-30
  12. read tool raw.githubusercontent.com · seen 2026-10-30
  13. file tool scope raw.githubusercontent.com · seen 2026-10-30
  14. web tools raw.githubusercontent.com · seen 2026-10-30
  15. research sub-agent raw.githubusercontent.com · seen 2026-10-30
  16. Claude Code launch arguments raw.githubusercontent.com · seen 2026-10-30
  17. CI workflow raw.githubusercontent.com · seen 2026-10-30
  18. release guide raw.githubusercontent.com · seen 2026-10-30
  19. development guide raw.githubusercontent.com · seen 2026-10-30
  20. package.json raw.githubusercontent.com · seen 2026-10-30
  21. licence raw.githubusercontent.com · seen 2026-10-30
  22. website learnharness.ai · seen 2026-10-30
  23. download page learnharness.ai · seen 2026-10-30
  24. domain registration (RDAP) rdap.identitydigital.services · seen 2026-10-30

Probe metrics

Not measured yet. Our benchmark probes haven't run, so there's no availability, latency or error rate from a run and Performance is pending. The pollers record uptime for hosted endpoints as they run, and that doesn't change the score either.

Pricing & changes

Free Free · OSS Free under AGPL-3.0 with nothing to buy. Model usage is billed by the provider the learner configures, or counts against a ChatGPT, Copilot or Grok plan, and the app shows a live cost meter. The README says any future charge would be for convenience such as managed keys or hosting.

Recent changes

  • Latest release

Follow them as a feed at /feeds/tools/learnharness.xml, or this listing's score history at history.json.

No connection details recorded for this listing. The facts and docs link in the overview have what we know.

Alternatives to LearnHarness

#9 of 52 in Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 1196 assistants comparisons

ZeroClaw BBNanoClaw BHermes Agent BOpenClaw BIronClaw Bnanobot B

Head to head asaply vs LearnHarness · Asmi vs LearnHarness · Atticus vs LearnHarness · Boba vs LearnHarness · Boski vs LearnHarness · Brea vs LearnHarness · Caddy vs LearnHarness · Claude Duet vs LearnHarness · CowAgent vs LearnHarness · DeepTutor vs LearnHarness · Del vs LearnHarness · folk vs LearnHarness · GAIA vs LearnHarness · Gemini Spark vs LearnHarness · Grok Bot vs LearnHarness · Hark Pro vs LearnHarness · Haven vs LearnHarness · Hermes Agent vs LearnHarness · HireAlpha vs LearnHarness · Instinct vs LearnHarness · IronClaw vs LearnHarness · LearnHarness vs Leon · LearnHarness vs Lindy · LearnHarness vs Lobby · LearnHarness vs nanobot · LearnHarness vs NanoClaw · LearnHarness vs Natura tinyNature · LearnHarness vs Dots · LearnHarness vs OpenClaw · LearnHarness vs OpenDuet · LearnHarness vs OpenInstinct · LearnHarness vs Orbits · LearnHarness vs Orchid · LearnHarness vs Pally · LearnHarness vs PicoClaw · LearnHarness vs Poke · LearnHarness vs QwenPaw · LearnHarness vs szn · LearnHarness vs Tab · LearnHarness vs Talorys · LearnHarness vs Tasker AI · LearnHarness vs Tomo · LearnHarness vs Town · LearnHarness vs Wajo (Fo) · LearnHarness vs Zapia · LearnHarness vs ZeroClaw · LearnHarness vs Zo Computer · AstrBot vs LearnHarness

Machine-readable

{} JSONM↓ MarkdownBadgeRSS

Similar toolGrade ScoreShared capabilitiesx402
ZeroClaw ZeroClaw LabsBB70.6assistant.memory assistant.self-hostedno
NanoClaw NanoCo, Inc.B68.6assistant.memory assistant.self-hostedno
Hermes Agent Nous ResearchB68.2assistant.memory assistant.self-hostedno
OpenClaw OpenClaw FoundationB67.4assistant.memory assistant.self-hostedno
IronClaw NEAR AIB66.8assistant.memory assistant.self-hostedno
nanobot HKUDSB63assistant.memory assistant.self-hostedno

Machine-readable

For vendors

Verify this listing

For the vendor

Is this your product? Link to this page from your own site or README, then tell us where. It shows people and agents that the listing is yours and that you know it's here. It never changes a grade, rank or review.

  1. Add the badge or a link

    LearnHarness on Anchor Terminal, C, 59.3/100
    On a light page
    On a dark page
    <a href="https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/learnharness"><img src="https://www.anchorterminal.com/badges/learnharness.svg" alt="LearnHarness on Anchor Terminal" height="20"></a>
    [![LearnHarness on Anchor Terminal](https://www.anchorterminal.com/badges/learnharness.svg)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/learnharness)
    <a href="https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/learnharness">LearnHarness on Anchor Terminal</a>

    It counts on a page on learnharness.ai or one of its subdomains, or the README of github.com/amosblomqvist/learnharness.

  2. Tell us where it is

    We read it once now and again every week. If the link is missing two weeks in a row the listing says so, and a later check puts it back.

Agents send the same to POST /api/v1/verify as {"slug": "learnharness", "url": "…"}, or call the verify_listing tool at /mcp. Ten checks an hour from one address. What we check. To announce the listing, get sharing assets for social media.

Create a listing video

Preview LearnHarness in motion, then download the video or its individual frames. Up to 30 seconds.

Open the video studio in a full page

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.

Get an auditSee a sample report