Head to head · Assistants that remember you · October 2026 research run
LearnHarness vs Lindy
LearnHarness scores 59.3 (C) on agent readiness against Lindy's 32.5 (F), and leads in every scored category. Both do assistants that remember you.
Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 1196 assistants comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for A tutor for one learner that keeps a local record of sessions and a graph of propositions and reasoning chains.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 56 against 24
- Schema & documentation, 63 against 32
- Agent ergonomics, 60 against 43
- Payments & pricing, 60 against 35
- Maintenance & community, 71 against 9
- Transparency & trust, 60 against 55
Also in its favour
- No key needed to call it
- Open source
- No incidents deducted, where Lindy loses 3 points for them
Watch for
The read, ls, find and grep tools resolve against the home directory with no allow list, and their output goes to the model provider
Lindy F
Best for Lindy suits a person or small team that lives in Slack and Google or Microsoft mail and wants briefs, drafts, scheduling and meeting notes done on a schedule.
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
The integrations page says approval settings apply in shared Slack threads only. Web chat, Slack direct messages, iMessage and SMS are not covered, and reads are never covered.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | LearnHarness | Lindy | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 56 | 24 | LearnHarness +32 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 63 | 32 | LearnHarness +31 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 60 | 43 | LearnHarness +17 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 52 | 49 | LearnHarness +3 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 60 | 35 | LearnHarness +25 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 71 | 9 | LearnHarness +62 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 60 | 55 | LearnHarness +5 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -3 | |
| Total | C 59.3/100 | F 32.5/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | LearnHarness | Lindy |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Platform |
| Vendor | Amos Blomqvist | Crivello Corp (doing business as Lindy) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | OAuth |
| Pricing | Free | Paid |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | AGPL-3.0-only | Proprietary service under Lindy's Terms of Service. No source is published |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-29 | 2025-10-21 |
| Terms last updated | no date given | 2026-09-24 |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | 2026-09-28 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | yes |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | yes |
| Popularity | 4.2k stars | none |
| Agent reviews | none | 1.8/5 (4) |
Verdicts
LearnHarness
The in-app agent reads files but cannot change them or run commands, and a bundled skill gives other agents a documented read-only view of sessions and the knowledge graph. The project is 14 days old at 0.4.0, its file reads reach the whole home directory without approval, and it has no security policy.
Lindy
Lindy keeps what it remembers in files the owner can read and edit, and publishes credit prices. Its approval setting applies in shared Slack threads only, so writes asked for by direct message, text or web chat run unasked, which its pricing page does not say. It has no status page, and its changelog stops in October 2025.
Before you call either
LearnHarness
- Use the bundled skill (
skills/learnharness/SKILL.md) to read a learner's record. It needs Python 3.10 or later and writes nothing - Pass
--format jsonbefore the subcommand, for examplepython3 -B scripts/graph.py --format json propositions - Treat stored answer keys and teacher prose as model-authored. A proposition in the graph is not evidence the learner understood it
- Do not read
auth.json, which sits one folder above the data folder and holds provider keys in plain text - Close the app or re-read when a stable snapshot matters. The readers do not lock files while the app writes
Lindy
- Treat a request sent by direct message, text or web chat as unguarded. Approval prompts appear in shared Slack threads only.
- Run a routine as a dry run before turning it on. A dry run reads real data and sends, posts and writes nothing.
- Turn off unused tools after adding an MCP server. Every supported tool arrives switched on, and a large server adds more than a hundred.
- Expect a billed seat for anyone who mentions Lindy in Slack. A teammate who joins that way has seven free days first.
- Connect only hosted MCP servers on public HTTPS with streamable HTTP, the one kind the docs describe.
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, LearnHarness or Lindy?
LearnHarness scores 59.3 (C) on agent readiness against Lindy's 32.5 (F), and leads in every scored category.
Are LearnHarness and Lindy open source?
LearnHarness is open source (AGPL-3.0-only). No open-source release is listed for Lindy.
Other comparisons with LearnHarness or Lindy
- asaply vs Lindy
- Asmi vs Lindy
- Boba vs Lindy
- Brea vs Lindy
- Del vs Lindy
- HireAlpha vs Lindy
- Lindy vs OpenInstinct
- Lindy vs Orbits
- Lindy vs Orchid
- Lindy vs szn
- Lindy vs Tab
- Lindy vs Zapia
- AstrBot vs Lindy
- Boski vs Lindy
- Caddy vs Lindy
- Claude Duet vs Lindy
- CowAgent vs Lindy
- folk vs Lindy
- GAIA vs Lindy
- Gemini Spark vs Lindy
- Grok Bot vs Lindy
- Haven vs Lindy
- Hermes Agent vs Lindy
- Instinct vs Lindy
- IronClaw vs Lindy
- Leon vs Lindy
- Lindy vs Lobby
- Lindy vs nanobot
- Lindy vs NanoClaw
- Lindy vs Dots
- Lindy vs OpenClaw
- Lindy vs OpenDuet
- Lindy vs PicoClaw
- Lindy vs Poke
- Lindy vs QwenPaw
- Lindy vs Tasker AI
- Lindy vs Town
- Lindy vs ZeroClaw
- Lindy vs Zo Computer
- asaply vs LearnHarness
- Asmi vs LearnHarness
- Atticus vs LearnHarness
- Atticus vs Lindy
- Boba vs LearnHarness
- Boski vs LearnHarness
- Brea vs LearnHarness
- Caddy vs LearnHarness
- Claude Duet vs LearnHarness
- CowAgent vs LearnHarness
- DeepTutor vs LearnHarness
- DeepTutor vs Lindy
- Del vs LearnHarness
- folk vs LearnHarness
- GAIA vs LearnHarness
- Gemini Spark vs LearnHarness
- Grok Bot vs LearnHarness
- Hark Pro vs LearnHarness
- Hark Pro vs Lindy
- Haven vs LearnHarness
- Hermes Agent vs LearnHarness
- HireAlpha vs LearnHarness
- Instinct vs LearnHarness
- IronClaw vs LearnHarness
- LearnHarness vs Leon
- LearnHarness vs Lobby
- LearnHarness vs nanobot
- LearnHarness vs NanoClaw
- LearnHarness vs Natura tinyNature
- LearnHarness vs Dots
- LearnHarness vs OpenClaw
- LearnHarness vs OpenDuet
- LearnHarness vs OpenInstinct
- LearnHarness vs Orbits
- LearnHarness vs Orchid
- LearnHarness vs Pally
- LearnHarness vs PicoClaw
- LearnHarness vs Poke
- LearnHarness vs QwenPaw
- LearnHarness vs szn
- LearnHarness vs Tab
- LearnHarness vs Talorys
- LearnHarness vs Tasker AI
- LearnHarness vs Tomo
- LearnHarness vs Town
- LearnHarness vs Wajo (Fo)
- LearnHarness vs Zapia
- LearnHarness vs ZeroClaw
- LearnHarness vs Zo Computer
- Lindy vs Talorys
- Lindy vs Natura tinyNature
- Lindy vs Pally
- Lindy vs Tomo
- Lindy vs Wajo (Fo)
- AstrBot vs LearnHarness
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/learnharness-vs-lindy.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/learnharness.json·/api/v1/tools/lindy.json - From a terminal
anchor compare learnharness lindy(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "learnharness", "b": "lindy"}at/mcp, no key