Head to head · Assistant proactive · October 2026 research run
Haven vs Lindy
Lindy scores 32.3 (F) on agent readiness against Haven's 22.2 (F), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Haven leads on reliability and maintenance & community. Both do assistant proactive.
Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 190 assistants comparisons
Which one, for what
Haven F
Best for A consumer assistant for one person who wants to phone, text or email it and have it remember them.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 35 against 24
- Maintenance & community, 35 against 9
Also in its favour
- No incidents deducted, where Lindy loses 3 points for them
Watch for
No approval setting or list of actions that need confirmation was found on the public pages. The terms say it sends emails, SMS and calls following the user's instructions.
Lindy F
Best for Lindy suits a person or small team that lives in Slack and Google or Microsoft mail and wants briefs, drafts, scheduling and meeting notes done on a schedule.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 32 against 4
- Agent ergonomics, 43 against 6
- Security & auth, 49 against 13
- Payments & pricing, 35 against 30
Also in its favour
- Free to start without a card
Watch for
The integrations page says approval settings apply in shared Slack threads only. Web chat, Slack direct messages, iMessage and SMS are not covered, and reads are never covered.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Haven | Lindy | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 35 | 24 | Haven +11 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 4 | 32 | Lindy +28 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 6 | 43 | Lindy +37 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 13 | 49 | Lindy +36 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 30 | 35 | Lindy +5 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 35 | 9 | Haven +26 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 51 | 52 | Lindy +1 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -3 | |
| Total | F 22.2/100 | F 32.3/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Haven | Lindy |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Platform | Platform |
| Vendor | Hello Haven, Inc. | Crivello Corp (doing business as Lindy) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | HTTP | |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth |
| Pricing | Free | Paid |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary service under Hello Haven's Terms of Service | Proprietary service under Lindy's Terms of Service. No source is published |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2025-10-21 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-07-24 | 2026-09-24 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-07-24 | 2026-09-28 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | yes |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | yes |
Verdicts
Haven
Haven answers by phone call, text, email and app, is free in beta with no card, and publishes a status page with dated incidents. No public page read says which actions need approval, which accounts it connects or how their tokens are kept, and it names no model provider or sub-processor.
Lindy
Lindy keeps what it remembers in files the owner can read and edit, and publishes credit prices. Its approval setting applies in shared Slack threads only, so writes asked for by direct message, text or web chat run unasked, which its pricing page does not say. It has no status page, and its changelog stops in October 2025.
Before you call either
Haven
- Haven has no documented API or MCP server. An outside agent can reach it only through the owner's channels (call, SMS, email, app).
- Do not assume an approval step before Haven sends mail, texts or calls. None is documented on the public pages.
- Email Haven sends to other people names Hello Haven as sender and says it was sent on the user's behalf, per the terms.
- Chat messages, history, profile context and uploaded files go to third-party AI model providers that the vendor does not name.
- Check status.hellohaven.ai before relying on phone or voice. All four published incidents affected those channels.
Lindy
- Treat a request sent by direct message, text or web chat as unguarded. Approval prompts appear in shared Slack threads only.
- Run a routine as a dry run before turning it on. A dry run reads real data and sends, posts and writes nothing.
- Turn off unused tools after adding an MCP server. Every supported tool arrives switched on, and a large server adds more than a hundred.
- Expect a billed seat for anyone who mentions Lindy in Slack. A teammate who joins that way has seven free days first.
- Connect only hosted MCP servers on public HTTPS with streamable HTTP, the one kind the docs describe.
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Haven or Lindy?
Lindy scores 32.3 (F) on agent readiness against Haven's 22.2 (F), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Haven leads on reliability and maintenance & community.
Other comparisons with Haven or Lindy
- AstrBot vs Haven
- AstrBot vs Lindy
- CowAgent vs Haven
- CowAgent vs Lindy
- GAIA vs Haven
- GAIA vs Lindy
- Gemini Spark vs Haven
- Gemini Spark vs Lindy
- Grok Bot vs Haven
- Grok Bot vs Lindy
- Haven vs Hermes Agent
- Haven vs Instinct
- Haven vs IronClaw
- Haven vs Leon
- Haven vs nanobot
- Haven vs NanoClaw
- Haven vs Dots
- Haven vs OpenClaw
- Haven vs PicoClaw
- Haven vs Poke
- Haven vs QwenPaw
- Haven vs ZeroClaw
- Haven vs Zo Computer
- Hermes Agent vs Lindy
- Instinct vs Lindy
- IronClaw vs Lindy
- Leon vs Lindy
- Lindy vs nanobot
- Lindy vs NanoClaw
- Lindy vs Dots
- Lindy vs OpenClaw
- Lindy vs PicoClaw
- Lindy vs Poke
- Lindy vs QwenPaw
- Lindy vs ZeroClaw
- Lindy vs Zo Computer
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/haven-vs-lindy.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/haven.json·/api/v1/tools/lindy.json - From a terminal
anchor compare haven lindy(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "haven", "b": "lindy"}at/mcp, no key