Head to head · Proactive personal assistants · October 2026 research run
Lindy vs Skydive
Skydive scores 52.1 (D) on agent readiness against Lindy's 32.5 (F), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Both do proactive personal assistants.
Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 1245 assistants comparisons
Which one, for what
Lindy F
Best for Lindy suits a person or small team that lives in Slack and Google or Microsoft mail and wants briefs, drafts, scheduling and meeting notes done on a schedule.
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
The integrations page says approval settings apply in shared Slack threads only. Web chat, Slack direct messages, iMessage and SMS are not covered, and reads are never covered.
Skydive D
Best for A person or team who wants hosted agents with their own cloud computers, memory and connected apps, reachable in Slack, email, text and a CLI, and who can drive them from scripts through the CLI.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 41 against 24
- Schema & documentation, 81 against 32
- Agent ergonomics, 59 against 43
- Security & auth, 59 against 49
- Maintenance & community, 56 against 9
- Transparency & trust, 75 against 55
Also in its favour
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
Watch for
The API has no operation for sending an agent a task. That runs through the CLI's chat -p, outside the OpenAPI contract.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Lindy | Skydive | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 24 | 41 | Skydive +17 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 32 | 81 | Skydive +49 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 43 | 59 | Skydive +16 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 49 | 59 | Skydive +10 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 35 | 35 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 9 | 56 | Skydive +47 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 55 | 75 | Skydive +20 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -3 | -5 | |
| Total | F 32.5/100 | D 52.1/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Lindy | Skydive |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Platform | Platform |
| Vendor | Crivello Corp (doing business as Lindy) | Create, Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | https://api.skydive.com/v1 |
| Transports | HTTP | |
| Auth | OAuth | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Paid | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary service under Lindy's Terms of Service. No source is published | Closed service under the Skydive Terms of Service (Create, Inc.), effective 29 July 2026. The skydive-cli npm package is published under the MIT licence. |
| Read-only variant documented | no | yes |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2025-10-21 | 2026-08-26 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-09-24 | couldn't be read |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-09-28 | couldn't be read |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | couldn't be read |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | couldn't be read |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | couldn't be read |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | couldn't be read |
| Popularity | none | 5.5k npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | 1.8/5 (4) | none |
Verdicts
Lindy
Lindy keeps what it remembers in files the owner can read and edit, and publishes credit prices. Its approval setting applies in shared Slack threads only, so writes asked for by direct message, text or web chat run unasked, which its pricing page does not say. It has no status page, and its changelog stops in October 2025.
Skydive
Skydive publishes an OpenAPI 3.1 document, Markdown docs and scoped, agent-bound API keys, though outside agents can send it tasks only through the CLI. Its status page records several major incidents, including a 25-hour Agent Hosting outage, and its home and pricing pages say data is never used for training while the privacy policy turns training on by default.
Before you call either
Lindy
- Treat a request sent by direct message, text or web chat as unguarded. Approval prompts appear in shared Slack threads only.
- Run a routine as a dry run before turning it on. A dry run reads real data and sends, posts and writes nothing.
- Turn off unused tools after adding an MCP server. Every supported tool arrives switched on, and a large server adds more than a hundred.
- Expect a billed seat for anyone who mentions Lindy in Slack. A teammate who joins that way has seven free days first.
- Connect only hosted MCP servers on public HTTPS with streamable HTTP, the one kind the docs describe.
Skydive
- Send tasks with
skydive chat -p "..." --agent <id> --jsonand pass--conversation <id>from the JSON to keep context. The REST API can't send a task. - Don't retry
chat -por a create blindly after a timeout. There's no idempotency key, so list agents or keys before retrying. - Ask the owner for an agent-bound
usekey when you only need to read. Account-leveleditkeys can create agents and mint keys. - Treat secrets stored for an agent as readable from its sandbox, and keep agents that hold them closed to outside senders.
- Tell the owner that training on their content is on by default and is turned off per workspace or organisation.
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Lindy or Skydive?
Skydive scores 52.1 (D) on agent readiness against Lindy's 32.5 (F), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories.
Other comparisons with Lindy or Skydive
- asaply vs Lindy
- asaply vs Skydive
- Asmi vs Lindy
- Asmi vs Skydive
- Boba vs Lindy
- Boba vs Skydive
- Brea vs Lindy
- Brea vs Skydive
- Del vs Lindy
- Del vs Skydive
- HireAlpha vs Lindy
- HireAlpha vs Skydive
- Lindy vs OpenInstinct
- Lindy vs Orbits
- Lindy vs Orchid
- Lindy vs szn
- Lindy vs Tab
- Lindy vs Zapia
- OpenInstinct vs Skydive
- Orbits vs Skydive
- Orchid vs Skydive
- AstrBot vs Lindy
- AstrBot vs Skydive
- Boski vs Lindy
- Boski vs Skydive
- Caddy vs Lindy
- Caddy vs Skydive
- Claude Duet vs Lindy
- Claude Duet vs Skydive
- CowAgent vs Lindy
- CowAgent vs Skydive
- folk vs Lindy
- folk vs Skydive
- GAIA vs Lindy
- GAIA vs Skydive
- Gemini Spark vs Lindy
- Gemini Spark vs Skydive
- Grok Bot vs Lindy
- Grok Bot vs Skydive
- Haven vs Lindy
- Haven vs Skydive
- Hermes Agent vs Lindy
- Hermes Agent vs Skydive
- Instinct vs Lindy
- Instinct vs Skydive
- IronClaw vs Lindy
- IronClaw vs Skydive
- Leon vs Lindy
- Leon vs Skydive
- Lindy vs Lobby
- Lindy vs nanobot
- Lindy vs NanoClaw
- Lindy vs Dots
- Lindy vs OpenClaw
- Lindy vs OpenDuet
- Lindy vs PicoClaw
- Lindy vs Poke
- Lindy vs QwenPaw
- Lindy vs Tasker AI
- Lindy vs Town
- Lindy vs ZeroClaw
- Lindy vs Zo Computer
- nanobot vs Skydive
- NanoClaw vs Skydive
- Dots vs Skydive
- OpenClaw vs Skydive
- OpenDuet vs Skydive
- PicoClaw vs Skydive
- Poke vs Skydive
- QwenPaw vs Skydive
- Atticus vs Lindy
- Atticus vs Skydive
- DeepTutor vs Lindy
- DeepTutor vs Skydive
- Hark Pro vs Lindy
- Hark Pro vs Skydive
- LearnHarness vs Lindy
- LearnHarness vs Skydive
- Lindy vs Talorys
- Skydive vs szn
- Skydive vs Tab
- Skydive vs Talorys
- Skydive vs Tasker AI
- Skydive vs Tomo
- Skydive vs Town
- Skydive vs Wajo (Fo)
- Skydive vs Zapia
- Skydive vs ZeroClaw
- Skydive vs Zo Computer
- Lindy vs Natura tinyNature
- Lindy vs Pally
- Lindy vs Tomo
- Lindy vs Wajo (Fo)
- Lobby vs Skydive
- Natura tinyNature vs Skydive
- Pally vs Skydive
Disclosure
Skydive competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/lindy-vs-skydive.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/lindy.json·/api/v1/tools/skydive.json - From a terminal
anchor compare lindy skydive(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "lindy", "b": "skydive"}at/mcp, no key